Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

저스트코인

@JUSTCRYT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,908subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440320043
TypeChannel
Username@JUSTCRYT
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JUSTCRYT

Growth

2,9032,9082,905.56 August 2026 — 2,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,905 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,907 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,908 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,902–2,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:342,908+1
10 Aug 2026, 18:012,907+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:202,905+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:472,903first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 2,908 subscribers
Avg views / post
443
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.317%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held30 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total13,275
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1666.7%
😁520.8%
👍312.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @JUSTCRYT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$ARC 곧 메인넷라는데 개미들 뭐 콩고물이라도 안주나요...?

7 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SPCXB/USDT 는 오늘도 달달구리~~ 디파이는 잘 몰라서 네더님한테 많이 물어보네용

1

7 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC308 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

팡팡 싸트 병장 크라이머 삼대장의 크라임레이더를 겨우겨우 따라하는 수준으로 만들었지만 아직 부족함

7 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC381 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

상장 참여 말고 상장 예측 당일 참여는 잘 봐야 1~2%임. 갭도 없고 거래량도 바닥인데 물리면 손실은 1~2%에서 안 끝남. 위는 막혀 있고 아래만 열려 있는 구조라 EV-라고 봄. 미리 사두는 건 반대임. 틀리면 기회비용, 맞으면 빔 통째. 승률 20~30%만 나와도 성립함. 손익비로 이기는 게임. 상장 남발도 예측 쪽엔 오히려 호재임. 깔아둔 게 호명될 확률 올라가고 회전도 빨라짐. 대신 지킬 건 지켜야 함. • 후보 10개 안팎으로 얇게 분산 • 안 맞아도 안 흔들릴 사이즈 • 언제까지 안 오면 정리한다는 기간 컷 • 이미 기대감 붙어서 올라 있는 건 패스 다음주도 남발 기조 비슷할 듯.

7 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC405 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

저는 절대 빗썸 사용안함 오로지 덤핑할때만 씁니다

👍3

7 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC227 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @leo_autotradingPhoto

남들 다 상폐시킬때 혼자 유의해제하고 입금왕 이벤트 종목으로도 추가 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

7 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC194 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LEEHEESANGDYORPhoto

☑️ TV랑 유튜버가 방문한 맛집을 시각화한 사이트가 나왔네요 요즘 바이브코딩이 점점난이도가 내려가다보니 뛰어난 아이디어들이 많이 나오는듯 동네 검색해봣는데, 엄청 많네요 🖥 홈페이지링크 🖥 관련트윗링크

7 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC317 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @justdegenguy

원상도 이제 스케줄이니까 TGE 상장때 따저씨들한테 넘기는거 아니면 고민도 안할게요 ~

7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC193 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @jammin0720Photo

최근 국내 거래소 근황 업비트 전년 동기 대비 -75% 빗썸 전년 동기 대비 -95% 코빗 운영자금을 위해 갖고 있던 암호화폐를 판매 (약 120억) 출처

😁1

7 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC308 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrencymagePhoto

OpenAI 연구자가 퇴사해 ‘텔레파시’를 만들기 시작했습니다 OpenAI에서 AI 정렬을 연구하던 나오미 바슈칸스키가 회사를 떠나 BCI 스타트업 Conduit의 창립 연구원으로 합류했습니다. Conduit이 만들려는 것은 뇌에 칩을 심지 않고 외부 장비로 뇌 신호를 측정해, 사람이 말하거나 타이핑하기 전의 생각을 텍스트로 변환하는 ‘Thought-to-Text’ 모델입니다. 현재는 머릿속의 문장을 그대로 읽는 수준이 아닙니다. 예를 들어 사용자가 ‘방이 더 추워진 것 같다’고 생각했을 때 모델이 ‘부드러운 바람이 불었다’고 해석하는 식으로, 정확한 문장보다는 대략적인 의미와 의도를 추정합니다. Conduit의 접근법은 초기 언어모델과 비슷합니다. 더 좋은 알고리즘 하나를 찾기보다 수많은 사람의 뇌 신호와 당시 말하거나 입력한 문장을

7 Aug 2026, 00:43 UTC463 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

이제 초기화권 팔 준비를 하는것 같슴다...

6 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 진행되지 못하고 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @JUSTCRYT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 472,698 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“저스트코인” (@JUSTCRYT), 2,908 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JUSTCRYT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.