Zoom Communications $ZM CrowdStrike $CRWD 📌최대 20배 레버리지 📌 “제로피” 📌89-90번째 RWA
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)

Channel
@Variational_Korea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
774subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002426212320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Variational_Korea |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Variational_Korea |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 774 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 774 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,598 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Zoom Communications $ZM CrowdStrike $CRWD 📌최대 20배 레버리지 📌 “제로피” 📌89-90번째 RWA
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Variational 3번째 AMA 기프트 당첨자 공지 🎁 함께 해주신 모든 분들께 다시 한 번 감사 인사 드립니다 gVAR 🚀 당첨자 분들은 @MOODOO_Diary 로 휴대전화 번호 DM 부탁드립니다! 🍗 치킨 5마리 (사전질문 선정자 5분) @kukuku121212 @kops2178 @soonuu78 @rocket7502 @adele6244 ☕️ 커피 10잔 (현장 질문 5분, 참여자 5분) @joji4680 @karf5115 @jaykaykim @defidaniel_kr @shadow7806 @Gomsoni @simsimh @realhongjerry @Frogman_FM @Soeolinyoung
👍2
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
✅iShares Russell 2000 $IWM ✅ Biotech ETF $XBI 📌최대 20배 레버리지 📌 “제로피” 📌87-88번째 RWA
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
늦은 시간까지 함께 해 주신 모든 분께 감사드립니다 Variational Korea 화이팅 (펄-럭) 🇰🇷
🔥1
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
8분 후 AMA 시작 🚨
🔥2
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Walt Disney $DIS Sony Group $SONY 상장 🚀 📌최대 20배 레버리지 📌 “제로피” 📌85-86번째 RWA
🔥1
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Variational Founder Lucas V. Schuermann: Why Swaps Could Become the Standard for On-Chain RWA Trading Variational is bringing off-chain TradFi liquidity into on-chain RWA derivatives through liquidity aggregation and hedging, rather than rebuilding a separate order book for every market. After initially offering RWA perpetuals, the protocol is preparing to launch swaps, with OLP directly hedging exposure in traditio…
Signed SJ (SeungJae)
AMA 리마인더 🚨 🗓️ : 8월 4일 (화) 21:00 (KST) 🗣️ : Hansolar, Linenmito, Magon 🎁 : 🍗 치킨 5마리 + ☕️ 커피 10잔 • 치킨 : 사전 질문 선정자 5분 • 커피 : 현장 질문 선정자 5분 + AMA 참여 인증자 중 5분 랜덤 ✅ 미션 : 구글폼으로 질문 + AMA 참여 🔗 구글폼 ⎟ AMA 링크 많은 관심과 참여 부탁 드립니다 🫡
👍2
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
신규 RWA 상장 🚀 BitMine Immersion Technologies $BMNR CEA Industries $BNC Forward Industries $FWDI 📌최대 20배 레버리지 📌 “제로피” 📌82-84번째 RWA
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
33주차 포인트 지급 완료 🪂 ✅ 15만 포인트 ✅ 24,728 트레이더 앞으로도 화이팅! 🔥
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Variational Korea 3번째 AMA 🇰🇷 Variational이 한국 커뮤니티만을 위한 3번째 AMA를 진행합니다! 이번 AMA에는 특별히 레젼드 트레이더 Hansolar, Linenmito, Magon님 세분을 모시고 “RWA 트레이딩 전략 & 인사이트”를 들어 보는 시간을 마련했습니다 🔥 또한, Variational의 최신 소식을 생생하게 전달 드리고, 한국 커뮤니티의 질문에도 대답해 드리는 시간을 갖고자 하오니 많은 참여 부탁드립니다! 🗓️ : 8월 4일 (화) 21:00 (KST) 🗣️ : Hansolar, Linenmito, Magon 🎁 : 🍗 치킨 5마리 + ☕️ 커피 10잔 • 치킨 : 사전 질문 선정자 5분 • 커피 : 현장 질문 선정자 5분 + AMA 참여 인증자 중 5분 랜덤 ✅ 미션 : 구글폼으…
❤7
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Variational 🤝 Arbitrum 파트너십 강화 Arbitrum의 가장 성공적인 프로토콜 중 하나로서, Variational이 양사간 더 강력한 파트너십을 체결했습니다. 파트너십 주요 내용 👇 1️⃣ Audit (보안 감사) • 3분기까지 Arbitrum 재단과 코드 보안 검사 최소 2건 이상 진행 예정 • 🔗 이미 진행된 감사 보고서 2️⃣ Gass Fee 지원 • Arbitrum 재단이 Gas Fee 스폰서십 예정 3️⃣ Variational Dune 대시보드 런칭 • Volume, OI, TVL, Execution Cost 등 트래킹 예정
❤1🔥1
Signed MOODOO_Diary (무두서)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Variational_Korea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 148,719 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Variational Korea” (@Variational_Korea), 774 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Variational_Korea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.