Channel
@korii_research
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
638subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002762070506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @korii_research |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/korii_research |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 638 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 642 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 640 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,778 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연…
📍버리형 버릇 못 버리고 다시 숏 외치는 중 🚨숏 포지션 중독은 병입니다....🚨
[美 클래리티 법안, 미국 상원 일정에서 제외] 미국 클래리티 법안(CLARITY Act)이 8월 6일(현지시간) 예정된 미국 상원의 의사일정에 포함되지 않았다고 코인텔레그래프가 전했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164918
👍1
AggrNews: ROBINHOOD US LISTS $CASHCAT AggrNews: ROBINHOOD 美国上架 $CASHCAT ———————————— 2026-08-06 20:41:54
봉크가이는 아직도.... 정신을 못 차렸군요.... 다른 밈코 홍보하다 갑분 유즈리스....
PERPDEXDAY KBW Red pill : find a real 참가팀 백커 라인업 Robinhood Coinbase VC Yzi lab Etoro Baincapital Dragonfly Ribbit VC Jump crypto X
래전드 라인업 ㄷㄷㄷ
https://bbx.com/news-detail/2983053 추후 Robinhood가 Bitstamp를 활용한 새로운 무언가를 내놓을 가능성이 높다고 보고 있음. 실제로 기존 Bitstamp X 계정도 Robinhood Crypto로 이름이 변경됐고, 인수 이후의 브랜드 정리를 넘어 크립토 사업을 하나의 흐름으로 통합하려는 움직임이 아닐까 싶음. 정확히 언제, 어떤 형태로 나올지는 알 수 없지만, Bitstamp와 연결된 재료가 등장할 가능성은 충분해 보이기 때문에 당장 결과가 없더라도 지속적으로 관찰해두면 좋을 듯함.
비트 스탬프 상장이 이렇게나 호재였다고???? https://x.com/i/status/2085290897042702570
⚡️⚡️⚡️ 북한, 동해상으로 미확인 발사체 발사
📍레오폴드 비공개 회사에 4억 달러 투자 어떤 회사인지는 아직 공개되지 않았다고 합니다. 그렇게 잃고 복귀하자마자 4억 불 베팅이라니 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ
"크립토는 훈련장이었다." 세상은 이제 밈코인 차트처럼 움직인다. 10년 넘게 크립토에 있으면서 배운 건 시장에 대한 것만이 아니었다. 앞으로 다가올 모든 것에 대한 준비였다... 다만 내가 여기까지 온 게 승리감에 취해서는 아니다. 13년 전 첫 BTC를 산 이후 겪은 그 어떤 하락장보다 더 지독하게 느껴지는 베어를 통과하면서 왔다. 그러니 추한 얘기부터 시작하자. 크립토 가격은 잔인했다. 그리고 나는 이게 단순한 "베어장"이라서라고 생각하지 않는다. 크립토가 더 이상 대중의 상상력을 사로잡지 못하기 때문이라고 본다. 이제 그건 AI의 것이다. ChatGPT의 등장은 "지적으로 가장 흥미로운 기술"이라는 자리에서 크립토를 밀어냈다(적어도 일반 투자자가 접근할 수 있는 것 중에서 가장 흥미로운 것이라는 자리에서). 2021-22년 불장을…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @korii_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 293,828 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코리의 코인리서치” (@korii_research), 638 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korii_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.