Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 공남은 합니다

Channel

공남은 합니다

@gongnam12

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,286subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002011037297
TypeChannel
Username@gongnam12
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gongnam12

Growth

5,2865,2915,288.57 August 2026 — 5,291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,291 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,290 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,289 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,286 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,285–5,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:235,286-3
11 Aug 2026, 10:125,289-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:085,290-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:005,291no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:595,291first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 5,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
268
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.246%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total5,362
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC92 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinboysPhoto

🇰🇷 가상자산 과세, 2030년까지 3년 유예 법안 발의 Source 국민의힘 정성국 의원이 가상자산 과세 시행일을 기존 2027년 1월 1일에서 2030년 1월 1일로 미루는 소득세법 개정안을 발의한다고 함. • 현행 과세 시작: 2027년 1월 1일 • 유예안: 2030년 1월 1일로 3년 연기 • 현재 기준 연 250만 원 초과 수익에 22% 과세 예정 • 과세 대상은 비트코인·이더리움 등 가상자산 양도·대여 소득 • 국민의힘은 별도로 가상자산 과세 자체를 폐지하는 법안도 추진 중 정 의원은 투자자 보호와 공정한 과세 기반이 충분히 마련된 뒤 시행해야 한다는 입장. 다만 아직 ‘발의’ 단계라 실제 유예 확정 여부는 국회 논의를 더 지켜봐야 함!

6 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC107 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연

3 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC271 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @c4lvinlocked

1. 토큰 스왑을 매도처리하고 스테이블코인끼리 스왑해도 22% 떼가고 이런건 다른 국가들도 하고있으니까 납득은 됩니다. 모든 과정에서 발생하는 수익에 대해 22% 세금을 떼겠다는 의지로 해석하면 되니까 뭐.. 2. 해외거래소와의 손익통산은 자진신고시 근거자료 제출하면 받아줄 것 같습니다. 자동 수집까지 바라기도 어려울듯.. 제일 우려스러운건 크립토에 상대적으로 익숙한 텔레그램 커뮤니티에서조차 이건 어떻게 처리되는거냐는 질문이 마구 나오는데 아직 명확하게 제시된 기준이 하나도 없다는 것. 자진신고 기반으로 운영해보고, 필요시 보완하겠다는데 결국 보완에 이르기까지는 수많은 코인러들의 행정처리 과정에서의 불편과 언제 올지 모르는 국세청으로부터의 호출에 대한 불안이 발생할 수 밖에 없음. 소수 납세자를 대상으로 납세 예정 금액이라도 산정해서

3 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC135 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @leo_autotrading

🚨 2027년부터 코인 수익에 세금 22% ① 매매·대여 수익 과세 - 2027년 1월 1일 이후 발생한 가상자산 수익부터 적용 - 연간 순이익에서 250만원 공제 - 초과분에 22% 과세 (소득세 20%+지방소득세 2%) - 첫 신고는 2028년 5월 ② 코인끼리 교환해도 과세 - BTC→ETH, USDT→알트코인 같은 교환도 매도로 간주 - 원화로 출금하지 않아도 교환 시점의 원화가치로 수익 계산 ③ 기존 보유자는 2026년 말 가격이 중요 - 2027년 이전부터 보유한 코인의 취득가격은 실제 매수가와 2026년 12월 31일 시가 중 높은 금액 적용 - 따라서 2026년 말까지 오른 가격은 상당 부분 과세 대상에서 제외되는 구조 예시: 2027년 순이익 1,000만원이면 1,000만원-250만원에 22% 적용 → 세금 16

3 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC206 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrencymagePhoto

베리나 포당 24불 판매 완료 https://t.me/Variationalpointsotc

31 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC315 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @easychartgo

컨빅션이라는 환상에 대해 밈코인 얘기할 때 컨빅션이라는 말이 자주 나온다. 초기에 진입해서 저 어딘가 고점까지 매도하지 않고 다이아몬드핸드로 버티는 것. 근데 데이터로 뜯어보면 좀 다르게 보인다. 가장 핫한 $MARS 화성을 TGE부터 87시간까지, 시간 단위로 다 발라봤는데, 몇 가지가 내 기존 생각과 달랐다. 1. 횡보는 매집이 아니었다 가격이 조용할 때 흔히 "매집 중인가?" 싶어진다. 근데 이 종목의 39시간 횡보 구간을 보면, 홀더 수는 3,379명에서 3,293명으로 오히려 줄었고 가격도 33% 빠졌다. 아무 일도 안 일어난 죽은 구간이었다. 재밌는 건 잔고 필터를 안 걸고 계산하면 같은 구간에 홀더가 33% 늘어난 걸로 나온다는 거다. 늘어난 게 전부 극소량이었다. 지표 하나 잘못 보면 죽어가는 걸 매집으로 착각한다. 2.

31 Jul 2026, 03:24 UTC280 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @inhu0Photo

$Index 유출? Pons 생태계 위에 Indices라는 신규 상품을 개발중 (source) 토큰 제작자는 거래 수수료 일부로 NVDA, SPY, QQQ 같은 토큰화 주식을 매입해 홀더에게 분배할 수 있습니다. Treasury로 유입된 금액의 10%는 Indices 수익으로 사용되며, 50%는 $INDEX 바이백 후 소각 50%는 주식을 매입해 $INDEX 홀더에게 분배

30 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC329 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JUSTCRYTPhoto

spot 에 잡히긴하는데..아직안올라온건가? 싶네요

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gongnam12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 628,593 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“공남은 합니다” (@gongnam12), 5,286 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gongnam12.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.