Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

리치원 인생투자간다

@dnjs885

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

75subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772656579
TypeChannel
Username@dnjs885
DescriptionTELE:https://t.me/dnjs885 KKT:https://open.kakao.com/o/gCal4Cae BLOG:https://m.blog.naver.com/dnjs885
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dnjs885

Growth

757 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:1675no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:1175first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 75 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.6
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total190
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,190
Videos
72
Links
2,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026

쌍봉주긴하지만 원웨이로 가버리는 시장이기에 그럴 수도 있으니 지옥이라고.. 반등 나오면 매도고 쌍봉 주면 땡큐주고 나오는겁니다 이런 대형주에코프로 카카오 2차전지 뷰는요

8 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC7 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @degen2468Photo

모든 급등주들은 쌍고를 주고 뒤지지, 그냥 뒤지진 않습니다. 4분기-내년1분기 사이에 메모리 전고점 봅니다. (지금부터 풀롱이라는 소리 아님/ 횡보하다 오를 수 있음) 저는 중간에 사팔할 수 있지만.. 올해 4분기나 내년 일분기까지 닉스 300 근처 삼전 38까지 봅니다 시체가 아무리 많아도 뭐 진짜 gme amc 같은 주식이 아닌 이상 쌍고 근처는 줍니다 다만 거기서, 메모리 600간다?는 모르겠습니다 많이 가야 300 언저리지 (270-350) 기술적 분석에 근거한 겁니다.

8 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC13 viewsread 9 August 2026

삼전 하닉 이익 추정치 같은 경우는 전세계에서 손 꼽히고 경상흑자도 좋은 뉴스가 나오지만 주가는 그에 따라 이동하지 않습니다 정보,뉴스,이익이 주가를 따라가는게 아니라 주가가 정보,뉴스,이익을 따라갑니다

8 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC8 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrencymage

요즘 코인 시장은 체감 난이도가 너무 높아졌습니다. 악성코드와 해킹을 피해야 하고, 남들보다 빨리 브릿지해야 하고, 온체인으로 자금 흐름을 봐야 하고, 프런트러닝과 봇 경쟁도 버텨야 합니다. 알트를 하나 사도 리베뉴, 토크노믹스, 바이백 구조를 봐야 하고, 트위터에서는 다음 내러티브가 어디서 생기는지 계속 따라가야 합니다. 예전처럼 “좋아 보이는 코인 사두고 기다리면 된다”는 식으로는 점점 돈 벌기 어려워지는 것 같습니다. 그런데 역설적으로 이런 극단적인 난이도 자체가 하락장 후반부의 특징일 수도 있습니다. 유동성이 빠지고 참여자가 줄어들수록 남은 사람들은 점점 더 작은 알파를 두고 경쟁합니다. 그래서 시장은 더 전문화되고, 살아남기 위해 필요한 정보와 기술의 수준은 계속 올라갑니다. 반대로 유동성이 다시 들어오는 순간에는 게임이 갑

7 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC12 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @tangtangbox

아는 형이 한국에 아파트 살바에 미국 부동산 사서 월세받고 한국은 그돈으로 월세 거주 하는게 낫다라고 했는데 확실히 그런거같긴해

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dnjs885. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“리치원 인생투자간다” (@dnjs885), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnjs885.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.