Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Азбука пси-практика | Платформа NEWPSY

Channel

Азбука пси-практика | Платформа NEWPSY

@newpsy_professional

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,748subscribers

+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201131075
TypeChannel
Username@newpsy_professional
DescriptionВсе о психотерапии: подходы, инструменты и техники от великих мастеров. Канал ведут Наталия Словесникова и Григорий Григорьянц - основатели платформы NEWPSY для изучения психотерапии на реальных сеансах мастеров. https://newpsy.org/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/newpsy_professional

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,63711,77811,707.56 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,679 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,673 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,669 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,661 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,654 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,653 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,650 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,647 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,645 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,637 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,644 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,645 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,722 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,717 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,711 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,714 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,712 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,717 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,716 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,724 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,713 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,717 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,720 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,721 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,717 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,712 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,741 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,745 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,752 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,750 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,748 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,754 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,761 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,767 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,770 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,772 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,771 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,773 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,774 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,778 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,775 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,773 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,770 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,765 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,761 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,763 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,757 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,756 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,755 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,754 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,752 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,751 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,747 subscribers11 November 2026 — 11,748 subscribers11,7486 August 202611 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 97 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,616–11,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:5011,748+1
8 Nov 2026, 12:2111,747-4
7 Nov 2026, 06:3811,751-1
6 Nov 2026, 05:0011,752-2
4 Nov 2026, 06:4011,754-1
3 Nov 2026, 08:0611,755-1
2 Nov 2026, 06:0111,756-1
1 Nov 2026, 03:2111,757-6
31 Oct 2026, 01:0611,763+2
29 Oct 2026, 23:4111,761-4
28 Oct 2026, 21:0911,765-5
27 Oct 2026, 21:3011,770-3
26 Oct 2026, 20:3811,773-2
25 Oct 2026, 23:2711,775-3
25 Oct 2026, 01:1611,778+4
24 Oct 2026, 00:4811,774+1
23 Oct 2026, 00:2111,773+2
21 Oct 2026, 22:3011,771-1
20 Oct 2026, 16:3111,772+2
19 Oct 2026, 18:4711,770first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.11%
avg views ÷ 11,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
718
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held41 (3 June 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total5,026
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
557
Videos
139
Links
493

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 14s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

899 reactions across 40 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤54360.4%
🔥13915.5%
👍11012.2%
🙏273.00%
😁252.78%
💯192.11%
🤔111.22%
👎101.11%
💩60.667%
😱60.667%
👏20.222%
👌10.111%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (85.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:38 UTC692 views31 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Печальная новость: Мы узнали, что скончалась Марша Линехан По сообщениям психиатра Аллена Фрэнсиса и коллег из ДБТ-сообщества, вчера 10 ноября в возрасте 83 лет умерла Марша Линехан - создатель диалектической поведенческой терапии (ДБТ), профессор Вашингтонского университета. ДБТ выросла из ее личной истории. В 17 лет Марша Линехан сама оказалась в психиатрической клинике и провела там больше двух лет. По ее словам…

❤19🙏12

10 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC679 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Продолжение поста «Читаем научные статьи дальше абстракта: ACT предотвращает госпитализации при психозе?» Позже обе команды объединили данные [3] (120 пациентов, ITT-анализ, смерть и заключение считали госпитализацией) и получили 24% против 43%, p < 0,03. Эффект сохранился, и это стоит сказать честно. Однако снижение «правдоподобности» симптомов объясняет в этом анализе лишь около 28% эффекта, а в одном из двух иссл…

❤4👏1

10 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC424 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Продолжение поста «Читаем научные статьи дальше абстракта: ACT предотвращает госпитализации при психозе?» Рандомизирован, но не проанализирован «Золотой стандарт» клинической статистики - анализ по принципу Intent-to-treat (ITT)*, «рандомизирован - значит проанализирован». Здесь рандомизировали 80 человек, а проанализировали 70. По словам авторов, в каждой группе четверо уехали из региона и один умер. Любопытно, ч…

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 14:34 UTC423 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Читаем научные статьи дальше абстракта: ACT предотвращает госпитализации при психозе? Сразу оговорюсь. Заголовок и абстракт - всегда витрина, и это понятно. Подходы конкурируют за гранты и за оплату страховыми, яркая формулировка помогает и в том, и в другом. Это не особенность ACT и не обязательно злой умысел. У ACT действительно много исследований, и одна слабая работа этого не отменяет. Но в качестве примера, поч…

❤4

9 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC638 views23 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Для практики: Горе - это не только травма: что такое «рост после утраты» На потерю близких психология обычно смотрит через призму травмы. Либо мы страдаем (посттравматическое стрессовое расстройство, затяжное горе), либо, наоборот, «растем» через пережитое. Последнюю идею называют посттравматическим ростом. В июле 2026 г. в журнале Death Studies опубликована статья Рут Малкинсон, Элиезер Виццтум, Роберт Нимейер и С…

❤18🔥5

31 Oct 2026, 05:04 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

От науки к практике: хронобиологические методы восстановления циркадного ритма сна и бодрствования В продолжение новостей науки о новом подтипе депрессии - «циркадной депрессии» - описанные в исследованиях хронобиологические методы - меры, ориентированные на коррекцию цикла сна и бодрствования. Рекомендуем к прочтению два обзора достижений в лечении нарушений циркадного ритма сна и бодрствования [1], [2]. Обе рабо…

❤8🙏4

28 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,140 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Новости науки: Новый подтип депрессии - «циркадная депрессия» 20 октября в British Journal of Psychiatry опубликовано исследование [1], имеющее важное значение для всех, кто занимается психотерапией депрессии. Выборка Исследование основано на клинических и генетических данных 11 380 австралийцев, страдающих тяжелой и рецидивирующей депрессией. Результаты Ученые установили, что циркадная депрессия затрагивает 23%…

❤17👍4🙏2🔥1

18 Sept 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,720 views25 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Там может быть кто-то живой, но кого это сегодня волнует?! Заметила, как изменился стиль обращений в поддержку. Стала сбрасывать непрочитанную почту, бишь отмечать прочитанной, не читая. Я так делаю, когда раздражает значек про 5 с чем-то тысяч сообщений. Там важных 2-3 в неделю, понятно, остальное рассылки и письма в поддержку моего NEWPSY, которые мне дублируются. Не то от скуки, не то для того, чтоб проснуться,…

❤23👍1🙏1

14 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,630 views32 reactionsread 12 November 2026

По следам прочтения эссе Билла Гейтса об ИИ Когда мои мысли заняты кем-то, я надеюсь, что и его мысли заняты мной (в том же количестве и качестве, конечно). Это надежда на отношения - гипотеза, которую необходимо проверить. Я в абсолютной неопределенности, ловлю взгляды, слова, действия, интерпретирую их, дабы степень неопределенности снизить. Это отражает два аспекта реальных отношений: ВЗАИМОдействие и ВЗАИМНОЕ п…

🔥19❤9👍4

10 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,560 views80 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня День Рождения легендарного нашего Отто Кернберга. 98 лет! Преподает, супервизирует, психотерапевтирует. Ум здравый, острый и живой настолько, что завидовать и не перезавидовать. Если вы не видели его сессии, вполне себе повод. Курс у нас на сайте по ссылке https://newpsy.org/edu/transference-focused-psychotherapy. Его работу просто обязан увидеть каждый профессионал, не зависимо от подхода. Да и уверена, пос…

🔥45❤34👌1

10 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,530 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Два события недели, которые любопытно смотрятся вместе: результаты PISA и презентация Apple Во вторник опубликованы результаты PISA за 2025 год*. Очередной, хотя и ожидаемый, рекорд - зафиксирован самый низкий за всю историю наблюдений уровень знаний по естественным наукам, чтению и математике. Каждый пятый (!) подросток демонстрирует низкий уровень знаний сразу по всем трем (!) ключевым направлениям. Особенно по…

❤17😱6👍2👎1😁1

30 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,700 views30 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Прочла эссе Билла Гейтса, чего и всем советую. Специалистам в области психического здоровья обязательно к прочтению, на мой взгляд. Напишу подробно. Если кто уже прочитал, интересно, на какие мысли вас навело. PS Отдельно польстило моему самолюбию, что мы с господином Гейтсом одни и те же работы научные цитируем. Про это тоже напишу, но так льстит, что можно и дважды.

❤27👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @newpsy_professional. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@newpsy_professional edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,033
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Университет практической психологии Н.И. Козлова
@univer_pp · 21,078
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог
@psy_professional · 25,355
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Сообщество психологов
@interviziya · 19,231
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,155
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов
@spb_idpo · 27,545
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,315
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Клинический психоанализ
@clinicalpsychoanalysis · 36,737
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Библиотека психология/ философия/ медицина
@biblio_psychology · 19,824
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Библиотека психолога
@psy_b00k · 21,889
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Smart | Медиа про психологию
@smart_inc_psy · 23,214
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Начинающие психологи
@new_psycholog · 19,391
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 38,902
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Азбука пси-практика | Платформа NEWPSY” (@newpsy_professional), 11,748 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newpsy_professional.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.