Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Азбука пси-практика | Платформа NEWPSY

@newpsy_professional

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,665subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201131075
TypeChannel
Username@newpsy_professional
DescriptionВсе о психотерапии: подходы, инструменты и техники от великих мастеров. Канал ведут Наталия Словесникова и Григорий Григорьянц - основатели платформы NEWPSY для изучения психотерапии на реальных сеансах мастеров. https://newpsy.org/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/newpsy_professional

Growth

11,66411,68111,672.56 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,681 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,679 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,673 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,669 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers11,6656 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,661–11,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:4611,665+1
12 Aug 2026, 01:1211,664-5
11 Aug 2026, 00:1311,669-4
10 Aug 2026, 02:5211,673-6
9 Aug 2026, 00:5311,679-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:3811,681+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:0311,677no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:4611,677first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.23%
avg views ÷ 11,665 subscribers
Avg views / post
843
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held22 (3 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total15,177
Reactions total346
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
555
Videos
138
Links
488

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
57s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

415 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24158.1%
👍7217.3%
🔥399.40%
😁215.06%
💯194.58%
🤔102.41%
💩61.45%
🙏40.964%
👎20.482%
👏10.241%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 415reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC644 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ИИ создает новое видение любви - идеальная совместимость и безоговорочная поддержка без встречных требований. На днях в Nature опубликованы результаты исследования, где ученые проверяли связь взаимодействия с ИИ-компаньонами и психологического благополучия [1]. Ученые обнаружили, что связь между общением с ИИ и психологическим благополучием не является однородной и зависит от реального (офлайн) социального окружени

👍167🔥2🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC598 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Не смог(ла) прослушать на двойной скорости. Коллега разместил видео, в комментариях в одной из соцсетей другая коллега сетует, что не нашла функцию прослушивания на двойной скорости. Печальная и уже довольно давняя тенденция. Связана она с тем, что наш мозг, с одной стороны, заточен на то, чтобы по максимуму обрабатывать окружающую информацию, с другой - совершенно не приспособлен к такому количеству входящих стиму

👍115

5 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC692 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Немного юмора вам с ленту 😉

😁20🔥117👍1

5 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC654 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Продолжение разбора TADS, начало выше 👆 Комм.: забыли добавить, что ltpp - некий неизвестный конструкт, придуманный специально для этого исследования и реализованный в виде руководства, которое не было опубликовано, в связи с чем к самому исследованию возникает еще больше вопросов - что они там делали. помимо того, что 60 сессий и 18 месяцев - это среднесрочная терапия и никак не долгосрочная. Ответ: Справедливо за

9

5 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC569 viewsread 13 August 2026

Продолжение разбора TADS, начало 👆 Тем не менее, исследование имеет ряд методологических изъянов, как в изначальном дизайне, так и выявленных по результатам. Исследование не показало (и не могло показать) чистый эффект именно психоаналитической терапии. Главный методологический изъян дизайна, о котором прямо пишут сами исследователи, - выбор контрольной группы TAU без совпадения по объему часов и внимания. Различ

5 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC547 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«РКИ долгосрочной психоаналитической психотерапии при резистентной к лечению депрессии: Тавистокское исследование депрессии у взрослых (TADS)» Питера Фонаги и соавторов [1] показало, что после окончания лечения улучшения были умеренными и сопоставимыми между группой долгосрочной психоаналитической психотерапии (LTPP) и контрольной группой (стандартное лечение), различия проявились через 24 месяца. Это важная работа,

6

4 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC674 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Индоктринированных легко узнать по комментариям (в любой сфере, по любой теме, не только в психотерапии). Индокринированные слепы к изменяющейся реальности и глухи к мнениям, мыслям, чувствам и потребностям других. Они не читают, они видят что-то, что ставит под сомнение их идеологию, и яростно кидаются в атаку. Идеология, конечно, мощная объединительная сила. Она способна буквально остановить время и заставить жи

💯194

2 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC903 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Проработать детство (мама/папу) - самая большая ересь из всей псевдо-психологической ереси, наверное. Звучит, однако, привлекательно, потому что в эти слова само собой вчитывается, что как-то (специальным образом) повспоминав детство, прошлое перепишется, и я такая опаньки - другой человек. Просто само собой всё изменится, что означает, что от разговоров в психотерапии неожиданно отрастает новый мозг, другой, не тот,

35👍6🔥4

2 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC783 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо от всей души! Именно в такие минуты - слыша такие слова - мы чувствуем ценность и важность своей работы, нам хочется продолжать! Наталия и Григорий, Основатели NEWPSY

17👍2🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC859 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Продолжение, начало выше 👆 Это ограничивает кругозор, потому что любая попытка посмотреть в сторону другого метода или даже просто посмотреть сессии (курсы с которыми по разным подходам я как раз и продаю), воспринимается отступничеством, такой специалист в своем кругу подвергается анафеме, что тоже психологического благополучия не прибавляет, а психологическая устойчивость ой как важна в нашей профессии. *** Втор

11🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC719 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

На прошлый разбор мета-анализа в разных формах поднимались две темы, которые и Кочетков с Россохиным пытались (мягко скажем) обсудить: (1) Критерий истины - практика; (2) Если человек годами ходит на психотерапию, значит, есть потребность, и такая потребность (вечно знакомиться с собой) должная быть. Еще мне часто задавали два вопроса: (1) Где логика? Утверждаете, что эффекта от психоаналитической терапии нет, а сам

👍31

31 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC659 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Часть 2/3, начало выше 👆 4. Предвзятость отбора (эффект добровольца). Выборка состоит из людей, способных оплачивать и посещать 3–5 сеансов в неделю на протяжении 3–4 лет. Это изначально более благополучная, осознанная и ресурсоемкая группа населения по сравнению с обществом в целом, но авторы даже не указывают на это ограничение в отличии, например, от Питера Фонаги и соавторов [5], исследование которых мы разбере

4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @newpsy_professional. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 143,877 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Азбука пси-практика | Платформа NEWPSY” (@newpsy_professional), 11,665 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newpsy_professional.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.