История, социология, аналитика, актуальная повестка дня и размышления. Основатель канала бывший главредактор "Русской Планеты" Павел Пряников @netovetz. Реклама @Kursistka Регистрация в РКН №4830972326 #QZKNS
https://boosty.to/ppryanikov
Created
8 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +683. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124,294–125,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:48
125,098
+680
12 Aug 2026, 18:03
124,418
+12
11 Aug 2026, 21:16
124,406
-10
10 Aug 2026, 20:41
124,416
-20
9 Aug 2026, 23:32
124,436
+5
9 Aug 2026, 00:55
124,431
+19
7 Aug 2026, 23:36
124,412
+13
7 Aug 2026, 00:12
124,399
-16
6 Aug 2026, 01:32
124,415
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
124,415
first reading
Engagement
92 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 125,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,200
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 92 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
92 (3 August 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
1,585,910
Reactions total
25,056
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,210
Videos
≈201
Links
≈7,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,383 reactions across 79 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤔
4,532
21.2%
💯
4,462
20.9%
😭
3,960
18.5%
👍
3,353
15.7%
❤
2,778
13.0%
🔥
929
4.34%
👀
622
2.91%
😱
590
2.76%
🆒
157
0.734%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,056reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 92 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tolk_tolk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Общим местом стало утверждение, что в развитых странах приверженцы левых идей – это высокообразованные люди и в целом с высоким человеческим капиталом.
Но некоторые цифры всё равно поражают.
Увидел данные, что в DSA – «Демократических социалистах Америки» (самой левой части Демпартии США) – 80% членов в возрасте 25 лет и старше имели высшее образование.
Представленность членов DSA по профессиям – в таблице.
Обращает…
Какой был первый указ немцев на оккупированных территориях СССР?
Встретил в ЖЖ свой пост от 2017 года:
«Купил интересную книжку «Госбезопасность в битве за Москву». Она состоит из сухих сводок из архива ФСБ. И вот в 1942 году НКВД пишет отчёты о том, как жили подмосковные города при немецкой оккупации. И везде упоминается, что первым постановлением новой власти (немецких комендатур или сформированных гражданских упр…
Вторая часть интервью казанскому изданию «Татар-информ». Тут больше о современности, но тоже с отсылкой к истории – над нами так и довлеет не только «проклятье географии», но и «проклятье истории».
«Я всегда говорил, что я оптимист в отношении средних сроков России. Краткосрочно у нас, конечно, будет тяжелый период, мой прогноз – это будет до 2029–2030 годов. Если мы отсчитаем семь-восемь лет от начала конфликта, с …
Мы знаем политико-экономический термин «патернализм». А у политиэкономиста социал-демократического направления Пола Колиера в его книге «Будущее капитализма» встретил термин, отражающий нынешнюю эпоху – «матернализм».
Он расшифровывает его как «чрезмерную заботу об отдельных группах, объединённых «самосознанием обиженных».
График изменения среднегодовых температур может многое объяснить для понимания крупных исторических изменений. Например, резкое потепление IX-XI веков («климатический оптимум») объясняет стремительное заселение славянами Восточно-Европейской равнины, ставшей пригодной для нормальной жизни. Тогда же начинается натиск викингов на Европу (включая Русь), их заселение Гренландии и Исландии. Потепление XIII века заставило …
Обратите внимание – 54% москвичей хотят жить в частном доме или таунхаусе (сейчас в них живут 7%). Наверное, в этом главное расхождение между желанием горожан и московских властей. Даже в огромной по площади и пустой Новой Москве мэрия стимулирует появление многоэтажных человейников, а не индивидуальной застройки.
Второе расхождение: менее четверти москвичей хотят жить в башнях выше 12 этажей – но именно такие башни…
Как война может менять гендер.
Это описывает историк Лори Стофф на примере женщин, тайно записывавшихся в российскую армию по время Первой мировой войны («Русский Сборник». Т. XXVI, 2018). Всего в российскую армию таким образом проникли несколько тысяч женщин.
«Первый и наиболее часто используемый способ сводился к тому, чтобы выдавать себя за мужчину, так как многие женщины могли сойти за юношей-подростков. Несмотр…
(к предыдущему посту)
Мнение ещё одного социального психолога, что «воукизм» (woke) - это именно женская стратегия поведения, и главенство женщин будет сильно отличаться от главенства мужчин:
«По словам Хелен Эндрюс, женщины биологически приспособлены к тому, чтобы изолировать (то есть отменять) соперников и защищать сплочённость группы любой ценой. Таким образом, переход управления к женщинам неизбежно приведёт к к…
В США после 2005 года большинство новых докторских степеней получают женщины. Похожие тенденции наблюдаются и в других местах, включая Австралию и многие европейские страны.
И социальные психологи Кори Кларк и Бо Уайнгард описывают, как преобладание женщин может изменить мир преподавания в университетах и академическую науку:
«Общая тема этих различий заключается в том, что мужчины больше, чем женщины, стремятся к п…
Хроническая беда российско-советско-российской экономики – отсутствие производства потребительских товаров. Ну не можем мы шить одежду и обувь, производить бытовую технику и автомобили и т.п.
На майском заседании Никитского клуба Мосбиржи, №145, примерно об этом говорит главный экономист Института ВЭБ Андрей Клепач. Он обращает внимание на накопление огромной массы депозитов, которые не перетекают в потребление – как…
И в очередной раз иллюстрация того, что молодёжь у нас мало политизированная, её главные устремления – частная жизнь.
Социологи собрали фокус-группы из молодёжи 18-25 лет в двух главных городах Приморского края, во Владивостоке и Находке. Время опроса – весна-лето 2024 года («Вестник Института социологии», №1, 2026). Поразил огромный уровень недоверия ко всем политическим акторам – как государственным, так оппозицион…
Наше начальство всё ещё живёт прошлым – оно сосредоточено на росте численности населения Сибири и Д,Востока.
Я же каждый раз пишу, что уходят последние сроки спасения регионов Нечерноземья – они почти обезлюдели вне региональных центров.
Но похоже, что пора уже спасать и Черноземье.
Увидел статистику, как сократилась численность населения в черноземной Тамбовской области – с 1,55 млн человек в 1959 году до 952 тыс. …
💯162😭76🔥30👍26🤔15❤12🆒2😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @tolk_tolk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,201 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 144 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 125,797#31
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Китайская угроза @daokedao · 99,246 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 121,967 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Давыдов.Индекс @davydovin · 1,914,265 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Дерипаска @olegderipaska · 118,574 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Димитриев @russ_orientalist · 129,417 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
ЧАДАЕВ @chadayevru · 93,663 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Тенденции эпохи @eratrends · 139,861 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Белковский @SBelkovskiy · 109,758 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Spydell_finance @spydell_finance · 131,145 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Vladimir Pastukhov @v_pastukhov · 153,856 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга @marketpsy · 175,795 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Пауки в банке @bankuyte · 93,590 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Одет аккуратно. Борода черная @oabch · 281,628 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Арсен Маркарян Официальный @arsenmarkarian · 160,722 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Мюсли вслух @mysly · 166,705 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
AGDchan @Agdchan · 98,828 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Скурлатов live @skurlatovlive · 1,044,809 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Мысли-НеМысли @mislinemisli · 153,139 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Макс атакует! @shevchenkomax_1 · 116,921 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
Бульдоги под ковром @kremlin_bulldogs · 104,524 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Журнал НОЖ @knifemedia · 101,929 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
BRIEFLY RU @brieflyru · 100,394 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Кремлёвский мамковед @kremlin_mother_expert · 180,451 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Небрехня @nebrexnya · 115,558 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Толкователь” (@tolk_tolk), 125,098 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tolk_tolk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
