Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психоаналитические дебаты

@psychobattles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,699subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002260995592
TypeChannel
Username@psychobattles
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychobattles

Growth

1,6941,6991,696.56 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,694 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,699 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,693–1,700 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:171,699+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:361,694-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:471,695no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:171,695first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 1,699 subscribers
Avg views / post
586
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,860
Reactions total278
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19m 48s
Average length
9m 54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

801 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
47058.7%
🔥11113.9%
❤‍🔥8911.1%
👍263.25%
💯263.25%
🤣202.50%
💔182.25%
😁141.75%
🎉70.874%
🥰70.874%
50.624%
👀30.375%
🍌20.25%
👏20.25%
🤗10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 801reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psychobattles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC221 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

- И что он делал? - Прикинь, ничего. Я к нему за советом, за эмпатией хоть какой-то - сидит молчит. - Просто молчит? - Не, ну сказал пару слов конечно, видно было, думал о чём-то своем... а так - просто сидит слушает. 50 минут, жесть. - 50 минут слушает? - Ну да... правда меня за всю жизнь больше 10 минут никто не слушал... И даже не пытался понять. Базовая терапевтическая единица психоанализа состоит из двух шагов:

23🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC320 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Раньше оно ведь как было? Сидишь ночью, куски видео собираешь, пересматриваешь, звук накладываешь и вот это всё. Загружать же ещё надо, про тайм-коды вообще молчу, я их просто не делал. А сейчас? Клод пыхтит одновременно над зум-записью видео настоящих неподделошных Психоаналитических дебатов про мать и собирает видосы с айфона с дебатов с командой гештальт. Затем и монтаж и всё что требуется. А я радуюсь утру, к

19🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC428 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Один из признаков настоящей личной свободы - это когда тебе ничего никому уже не нужно доказывать. Убеждать, быть правым, значимым или заметным. Вы скажете - социофобия, я скажу - солидная уверенность. Никакие там «гордись собой», никакие внешние оценки, включая влюблённость или хейт, не дадут такого крутого и спокойного состояния, как это - делаешь свое дело, никому ничего не доказывая. Так и в наших «Психоанал

18👍16🔥4💯1

31 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC618 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Помните тот день, когда вы в первый раз вернулись в дом родителей после отъезда во взрослую жизнь? Биение сердца помните? Какой транспорт был - автобус, поезд, самолет, корабль? Ничего же не изменилось в доме тогда, Господи, за неделю, месяц... да даже за год ничего не изменилось. Кроме тебя. Ключ подходит. Почему бы ему не подходить. Проверьте лет через двадцать. Хорошо бы это был рассвет. Вечер тоже хорошо, но

35💔6🔥4

30 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC544 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥85❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC573 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ретроградный Сатурн заставляет перепроверять старые задачи. Завершать старые проекты и выполнять отложенные обязательства. Наводить порядок в документах, отчетах и рабочих архивах. Анализировать прошлые ошибки и пересматривать свои долгосрочные цели. И вспоминать, что изначально этот канал был создан не для стихов, самораскрытия и личных рефлексий, а для освещения Первых в России Психоаналитических Дебатов. Которы

20🔥12

28 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC557 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Утро конца июля Заря свежа и пустынна Приснились перед рассветом Пыльные пятки сына Летние дни впитались Под кожу упавшей малиной Немытыми на ночь остались Пыльные пятки сына Каша с утра остывает - Сбежал, как Том Сойер, мимо К вечеру лишь приползают Пыльные пятки сына Друзья за воротами ждали- Мальчишки неисправимы Все игры переиграли Пыльные пятки сына Без кепки вихры выгорают Под солнцем неумолимым Трава и пес

❤‍🔥285🔥3👍2🤗1

24 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC679 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

"… когда два человека видят и понимают взаимную уязвимость - может родиться Любовь. … а если уязвимость не принимается в Другом, а значит и в себе, да ещё происходит бряцание Достижениями - вряд ли возможна истинная близость…" Обожаю своего супервизора Л.А.Терневскую. Что ни встреча, то шедевр. Некоторые шедевры проживаю на себе. Уязвимости хоть отбавляй. Хочется бряцать достижениями. Но в предыдущей супервизии б

17🔥3😁1

22 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC740 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Московским летом часто бывает, что идея превалирует над организацией. Чёткой и понятной, как расписание в пионерском лагере. Встреча, на которую я приглашаю - не душная лекция про Obsidian. Это встреча о том, как управлять профессиональными знаниями. Структурировать их и работать с ними, как с единым пространством. Что будет на практике: 1️⃣ Вживую покажем готовую базу знаний по психоанализу в Obsidian. 2️⃣ Разбе

🔥97👍1

21 Jul 2026, 04:54 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мария, покажи свою ризому. Я хочу понимать, как устроена база знаний по психоанализу и научиться ей пользоваться. И сделать собственную. Хочу видеть взаимосвязи теорий и понятий психоанализа - и не только его. Видеть, а не держать всё в голове. Не хочу больше терять свои мысли, конспекты, статьи, подкасты, каналы, сессии, супервизии, прочитанные и непрочитанные книги. Мне нужно быстро искать данные- и вносить нов

12🔥7👍4👏2

15 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC915 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Читаю в небольшом отпуске «Идиота». Нетфликсовыми мозгами подумал - практически каждую главу Достоевского можно развернуть на полноценный мини-сериал. С сюжетными линиями, яркими героями, с загадкой и катарсисом. И невероятной красотой, конечно. Вот умел же человек писать. Умел знать людей и их природу, думать о них. Всем бы психотерапевтам так. Погружение в атмосферу мгновенное, точное и неотрывное. Есть одна п

23😁3🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 05:09 UTC≈1,300 views68 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Опубликовал интервью "Инцест. Психоаналитическое исследование". Мои гости: Светлана Федорова, психоаналитик, супервизор магистерской программы НИУ ВШЭ, кандидат SPP и IPA. Татьяна Копаева, психоаналитический психотерапевт, магистр психологии, соавтор работы "Семья как место травмы. Психоаналитический взгляд на инцест". (второй соавтор - Алина Грибова, психоаналитический психотерапевт, магистр психологии). Об это

36🔥20💔12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychobattles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,021 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психоаналитические дебаты” (@psychobattles), 1,699 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychobattles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.