Life Practic – повышение квалификации для психологов.
Все курсы здесь: https://life-practic.ru/
✦Канал для психологов о психологии, который ведут профессиональные психологи😀
Канал в MAX: https://max.ru/lifepractic
Регистрация РКН: https://vk.cc/cHnnd
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
29 measurements spanning 31 days, net -187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,180–33,423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 01:01
33,208
-3
4 Sept 2026, 10:19
33,211
-7
2 Sept 2026, 20:24
33,218
-6
1 Sept 2026, 21:16
33,224
-10
31 Aug 2026, 21:46
33,234
+1
30 Aug 2026, 22:14
33,233
-23
29 Aug 2026, 22:35
33,256
-6
28 Aug 2026, 22:06
33,262
-10
27 Aug 2026, 21:26
33,272
-5
26 Aug 2026, 23:15
33,277
-6
26 Aug 2026, 02:07
33,283
-14
25 Aug 2026, 01:23
33,297
-7
23 Aug 2026, 14:44
33,304
-12
21 Aug 2026, 21:28
33,316
+4
20 Aug 2026, 15:28
33,312
+10
19 Aug 2026, 17:54
33,302
-11
18 Aug 2026, 18:57
33,313
-3
17 Aug 2026, 18:13
33,316
+3
16 Aug 2026, 17:55
33,313
-1
15 Aug 2026, 03:17
33,314
first reading
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.03%
avg views ÷ 33,208 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.539%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 115 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
115 (28 July 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
125,177
Reactions total
546
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 05:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,970
Videos
≈306
Links
≈585
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32m 56s
Average length
6m 35s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
765 reactions across 76 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
491
64.2%
🔥
87
11.4%
👍
68
8.89%
🙏
30
3.92%
custom 5411571557879277853
29
3.79%
😍
18
2.35%
😁
17
2.22%
🎉
12
1.57%
👏
5
0.654%
👌
3
0.392%
🤔
3
0.392%
🤩
2
0.261%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.96%
8 of 115 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,250
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,810
over 86 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqufSbwR
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2VtzqvEakMy
1
9 August 2026
9 August 2026
2VtzqvK1grF
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
2VtzqvoBoXH
1
8 August 2026
8 August 2026
2Vtzqw6ktuh
1
9 August 2026
9 August 2026
2Vtzqw8TSPc
1
3 August 2026
3 August 2026
2VtzqwRrjqu
1
23 August 2026
23 August 2026
2VtzqxjsC7m
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пройдите тест: «Синдром самозванца: насколько сильно он тормозит развитие вашей практики?»
🗓 Завтра, 7 сентября, в 19:00 МСК, встречаемся на открытом вебинаре с Ириной Исаевой «Почему хорошие психологи не начинают вести группы: 5 правил самозванца, которые пора нарушить».
🎁 Сразу после короткой регистрации вы получите в подарок гайд о преимуществах и специфике работы с группами через интернет, а также запись эфира …
📚 Инструменты КСТ в работе с тревогой и паническими атаками
Один клиент может понимать причины своей тревоги, но продолжать просыпаться с комом в горле и напряжением в груди, контролировать каждую мелочь и избегать ситуаций, от которых ему становится не по себе.
Другой клиент приходит в терапию со словами «у меня паническая атака», подробно перечисляет симптомы и сразу задаёт направление терапии.
Если принять само…
💌 Какая тема сейчас вам наиболее интересна в профессии?
Для многих из нас осень — время новых знаний ещё со времен школы и студенчества.
Новые знания и навыки помогают сохранять интерес к своему делу и являются хорошим средством профилактики выгорания.
А что вам помогает не терять интерес? Делитесь в комментариях ⤵️
А мы подготовили подборку интересных статей с нашего сайта.
📎 Экзистенциальная психотерапия: техн…
КСТ — современный метод психотерапии тревоги, фобий, панических атак с 95% эффективностью
Этот подход пока мало известен в России, однако у него есть много преимуществ.
🌟 В КСТ терапевт исследует не только саму проблему клиента, но и действия, которые поддерживают её прямо сейчас.
Краткосрочная терапия переводит фокус с длительного анализа проблемы на быстрое изменение механизмов, которые не дают клиенту двигаться…
«Если я отпущу контроль, всё развалится»: как гиперответственность разрушает жизнь клиентов
Случай из практики:
💼 Мужчина, 30 лет. Вовремя уходит с работы, но мысленно продолжает выполнять задачи: перепроверяет письма, переделывает отчеты за другими, держит всё под контролем, потому что внутри постоянно звучит голос:
«Если я допущу ошибку, случится катастрофа»
Пытаться убедить себя «просто расслабиться» — недоста…
Краткосрочная терапия работает только с симптомом. Так ли это?
Один из распространённых мифов о краткосрочной стратегической терапии (КСТ) — якобы метод работает «поверхностно»: терапевт даёт поведенческие предписания, помогает изменить ритуалы и привычные способы реагирования, но до глубинных механизмов проблемы не добирается.
✨ В коротком фрагменте видео краткосрочные терапевты Павел и Евгения Синицы объясняют, п…
Специальные условия участия на курсе Ариэля Натансона «Психология сексуальности»
На вебинаре мы рассмотрели один фрагмент большой профессиональной темы: работу с сексуализированной травмой.
➡️ На курсе «Психология сексуальности: травма, фантазии, перверсии» вы сможете глубже исследовать, что стоит за сексуальным поведением клиента, как обсуждать табуированные темы без оценок и на что опираться при выборе направлени…
Трансляция на этой площадке завершена 😔
👉 Продолжение эфира доступно здесь:
ССЫЛКА НА ВХОД В ВЕБИНАРНУЮ КОМНАТУ
В вебинарной комнате Ариэль Натансон продолжает разбирать работу с сексуализированной травмой. Совсем скоро перейдем к супервизии, где Ариэль продемонстрирует, как переходить от деталей случая к клиническим гипотезам и возможному направлению терапии.
Переходите по ссылке выше, чтобы присоединиться к уча…
💬 Коллеги, если во время эфира у вас появятся вопросы, оставляйте их в комментариях под этим постом 👇🏻
Модераторы будут следить за обсуждением и помогать с организационными и техническими вопросами.
Желаем полезного просмотра! ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @psypractic_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@psypractic_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Психология | Psychologies @PsychologiesRussia · 54,019 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА @psyaal · 38,971 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Mindspa | Самопомощь @mindspa_ru · 34,762 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Доктор Курпатов @kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,358 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа @Inpsycho · 31,322 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
«СУТЬ ВЕЩЕЙ» | Центр интеллектуальных практик Андрея Курпатова @myshlenie_kurpatov · 43,499 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни @anettaorlova · 40,537 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Институт психологии Life Practic” (@psypractic_ru), 33,208 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psypractic_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.