😃😃👌 другое прочтение
😁45🔥19💯5🤣4

Channel
@new_psycholog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,190subscribers
+82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001598300583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @new_psycholog |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/new_psycholog |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 19,190 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 19,188 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 19,202 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 19,214 | +12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:25 | 19,202 | +30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 19,172 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 19,176 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 19,175 | +11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 19,164 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 19,171 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 19,164 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 19,172 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 19,183 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 19,181 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 19,176 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 19,170 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 19,164 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 19,171 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 19,173 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 19,158 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (24 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 49,390 |
| Reactions total | 1,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,857 reactions across 31 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 659 | 35.5% | |
| ❤ | 636 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 212 | 11.4% | |
| 🤣 | 165 | 8.89% | |
| 😁 | 88 | 4.74% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 1.24% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 1.24% | |
| 🎉 | 19 | 1.02% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 0.808% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.269% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.269% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.215% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.162% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @new_psycholog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😃😃👌 другое прочтение
😁45🔥19💯5🤣4
Коллеги, С Днём знаний! Праздник, который с нашей профессией всегда актуален 😃 Хочу пожелать, чтобы все ваши знания конвертировались в умения и навыки через практику. Приносили радость, реализацию и воплощение в любимой профессии ❤️ Этой осенью в нашем проекте можно присоединиться к таким группам и курсам👇 1. Курс "Ведущий групп" от ведения до запуска. https://new-psycholog.ru/last_hero 10.09.26 идет набор 2. Ма…
❤12🔥7👍4
«Лаборатория концепции группы» я решила сделать отдельный мастер-класс После вебинара "Ведущий групп" я увидела, что многим важно сначала попробовать формат, разобраться со своей идеей группы и только потом принимать решение о большой программе. Это практикум для тех, кто хочет сориентироваться в групповых форматах и понять какую группу они реально могут создать. Что можно запустить или вести в ближайшее время, с у…
❤13👍8🔥3
«Что самое классное что есть в групповой работе? От чего горят глаза?» - спросила я у своих модераторов групп… - Люди, ответили они. - Люди. Я с ними согласна. Люди это самое потрясающее что есть в групповой работе. Соприкосновение с их космосом мыслей, личности и многогранности, взаимодействие и переплетение, влияние и изменение. One love ❤️
❤43🔥14👍7❤🔥1
В последнее время я чувствую себя… Выберите самый подходящий вариант ответа на момент сейчас. Давайте сверимся
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥8👍3❤1💯1
Рубрика "Карта дня" 🙌 Сегодня предлагаю найти в себе ответ на такой вопрос: "Какие свои сильные стороны я могу использовать в работе с клиентами?" Посмотрите на карту 👆 Какие чувства поднимаются при взгляде на неё? Что на ней изображено? Какая деталь привлекает внимание больше всего? Про что это для вас? Какой ответ? Не торопитесь, прислушивайтесь к своим ощущениям, постепенно отвечайте на вопросы. Если выписывать…
❤17👍5🔥5
Группы с маленьким блогом собирать можно? У наших участников получается, и ДАЖЕ! оффлайн 🤩 Вебинар "Ведущий групп" состоится сегодня в 18.00 в ZOOM Записаться 👉 https://t.me/+yjAf3s800OthOTIy
❤16🔥7🙏1
Встречаемся 27.08.26 в 18.00 по МСК Где? тут https://t.me/+yjAf3s800OthOTIy Что будет? Стратегия и путь роста в частной практике с 0 до 400т.р. в месяц Как? Через личную практику и групповой формат Для кого это? Для тех, кто только начинает и пока ничего не зарабатывает и для тех, кто готов пробить потолок в 200т.р. в месяц А что еще? Поговорим про практику от которой горят глаза 🤩🤩🤩 Запись будет, но всегда инт…
🔥31🙏7👍4❤2😁1
Групповая практика усиливает результат каждого. Спойлер: Если эта группа правильно собрана и в ней безопасно. Потому что если попасть не туда, тебя там могут не только не усилить, но еще и размазать. Групповая динамика работает во все стороны. Люблю групповые процессы именно поэтому. Работаю в команде единомышленников, потому что это не только супер эффективно, это еще и большое удовольствие ❤️ Горящие от практи…
👍12❤6🔥6
"Если у меня нет целевой аудитории, я ее не знаю и не понимаю, можно ли в программу?" Можно и нужно, потому что там есть большой урок с планом как ее определить, с конкретными примерами. Я также хочу провести мастер-класс в рамках программы по Целевой аудитории, потому, что это ключевая тема, которая вам сильно поможет на всем пути продвижения. Если вы с ней, конечно, разобрались. И будет сильно вас тормозить если …
❤10🔥7👍2
Ищу модератора В нашу уже традиционную программу по продвижению "Точка роста" (запускается 1 раз в год) Условия: 1. Вы проходили Точку роста с уроками. 2. У вас есть серьезные результаты, которыми вы гордитесь. 3. Вам нравится формат Точки и тема продвижения. 4. Вы любите групповую работу 5. Вы хотите со мной работать. Предложение: 1. Проведение моих групп Точки (2 раза в месяц) 2. Оплата труда на собеседовании 3. …
❤17🔥9👍5
Ну Жеваный ты крот… За 55тыс. руб., я напомнила себе, что с людьми, которые написали тебе в личку ТГ СПАМ-сообщение и предложили свои услуги, работать нельзя! Знаете эти сообщения? «Привет, я настрою вам рекламу, у меня есть куча кейсов и подписчик у вас будет 100р.» 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️ Не знаю в каком я была настроении и состоянии, что согласилась попробовать…видимо расстроенном блокировками. Да, я иногда пробую какой-т…
🔥27❤18👍9😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @new_psycholog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@new_psycholog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В последнее время я чувствую себя… Выберите самый подходящий вариант ответа на момент сейчас. Давайте сверимся
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Начинающие психологи” (@new_psycholog), 19,190 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/new_psycholog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.