Channel
@ahlullhadith
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,092subscribers
+103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002027789413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ahlullhadith |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ahlullhadith |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:57 | 6,092 | +25 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 6,067 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 6,063 | +2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 6,061 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 6,059 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:48 | 6,057 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 6,058 | -4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 6,062 | -4 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 6,066 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:01 | 6,068 | -5 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 6,073 | -4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 6,077 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 6,069 | +18 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 6,051 | +62 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 5,989 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 5,985 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 5,983 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 5,981 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 5,979 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 5,974 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (19 October 2025 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 12,830 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
غاية ما عند المخالفين في تسويغ الاستغاثة بالأموات والغائبين ثلاثة أحاديث، عليها مدار استدلالهم، وهي أجود ما استدلوا به في هذا الباب من جهة الإسناد. ومع ذلك، فهي مناكير وأوهام لا تصح ولا تثبت، وقد بينتُ عللها تفصيلاً بما يدحض حجيتها في هذه السلسلة: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcipKF6106jv8uw3J7YIbWnmducTG-GXU&si=ju_LXvuju3BiC5CC
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية: «ليس كلُّ مَن وجد العلم قدر على التعبير عنه، والاحتجاج له: - فالعلم شيء. - وبيانه شيء آخر. - والمناظرة عنه وإقامة دليله شيء ثالث. - والجواب عن حجة مخالفه شيء رابع». جواب الاعتراضات المصرية (ص٤٤).
أدلجة المحدثين!! طريقة تعامل صاحب كتاب "العتب الجميل" في إثبات انحياز المحدثين إلى النواصب، وتحايدهم عن أهل بيتِ عليٍّ وشيعتهم، تدل على غفلةٍ شديدةٍ عن طريقة نقاد الحديث في معايير اختيار الرواة وجرحهم وتعديلهم. ولإثبات ذلك، سأختار نموذجا من المحدثين لا يُشك بولائه لعلي وأهل بيته، حتى نُسب للتشيع، وطريقة احتجاجه بالرواة النواصب وإعراضه عن بعض أبناء علي وشيعتهم؛ ليُعلم أن قوانين الرواية أوسع من العقول المؤدلجة الضيقة…
المحدثون والسلطة: كان تبنّي بعضُ خلفاء السلطة العباسية لعقيدة خلق القرآن وفرضها على الناس؛ فتنةً لأهل الحديث، واختبارًا لصدقهم وأمانتهم على الرواية، ليبقوا متجرّدين للحق، بعيدين عن أهواء السلطة ومسايرتها على الباطل. وقد عاصر الإمام البخاري فتنة خلق القرآن التي بدأت على يد المأمون (198- 218)، ثم المعتصم (218- 227)، ثم الواثق (227-232)، وهؤلاء الثلاثة كانوا على عقيدة المعتزلة مع تشيُّع يسير فيهم، وهم الذين حملوا ا…
وضع علماءُ الشريعة لإثبات النص النبوي علمَ أصول الحديث، ولتفسيره ووجوه الاستدلال به علمَ أصول الفقه. وهذان علمان متكاملان في خدمة النص الشرعي؛ فينتج عن علم أصول الحديث معرفةُ المقبول من المردود، وعن علم أصول الفقه العملُ بالنص أو توجيهُه أو تركُه. ولا يلزم أن يكون المقبول إسنادًا عند نقاد الحديث معمولًا به عندهم؛ لاحتمال المعارضة أو النسخ أو التأويل. كما لا يلزم أن يكون المردود عندهم مطّرحًا؛ لاعتضاد معناه بإجما…
ظهرَ الإمامُ محمد بن عبد الوهاب في زمنٍ فشا فيه ألوانُ الانحرافِ في الأصول والفروع، كالغلو في التقليد في الفقه وشيوعِ البدع وانتشارِ الشرك وعبادةِ القبور، فدعا إلى تجريد التوحيد لله والمتابعةِ لرسوله بالحجة، وآزرَهُ الإمامُ محمد بن سعود بالسيف، فانتشرت دعوتُه وتلقاها أهلُ الإنصاف بالثناء. وما هي إلا تقريرات شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية ومدرسته الشامية، فمبعثها نجديٌ وحقيقتها شامية، جدّد بها مدرستَهُ بعد أن كان يُنادى على ق…
Posted without readable text
تحميل كتابي: أسس اختيار الرواة عند الإمام البخاري - دراسة تحليلية لأسباب تحايد الإمام البخاري عن الراوي (جعفر الصادق أنموذجا). الكتاب دراسة في منهج البخاري النقدي، وأسسه في اختيار رجال صحيحه، وأسباب تحايده عن بعض الثقات، مع روايته عمّن هم دونهم في الحفظ والإتقان، وهو محاولة لتجديد منهج النقد التاريخي عند المحدثين. وأسعد بملاحظاتكم وآرائكم النقدية. #فوائد_حديثية #جديد_الكتب
File, posted without a caption
طلبُ الفقهِ «بدليلِه» والحرصُ على اتباع القول الأقرب للسُّنَّة مطلبٌ شريفٌ ومقصدٌ رفيع، لا يُذمُّ طالبُه ولا يُوبَّخُ قاصدُه، وهو مسلك أهل العلم المحققين قديمًا وحديثًا، وليس في سلوك هذه الطريقة الأثرية تحقير لفقه الأئمة المتبوعين، ولا تجريد لهم عن طلب الحق بدليله؛ بل طالب الفقه «بدليله» لا يخرج عن مذاهب فقهاء الأمصار، ولا يتبع شذوذ الأقوال ومهجور الآراء، فضلًا عن خرق إجماع الأمة المتيقّن، وإنما يخرج من ضيق "معتمدا…
شرح الزرقاني هو خلاصة الشروح الثلاثة على الموطأ: التمهيد لابن عبد البر، والمنتقى للباجي، والمسالك لابن العربي. مع نكت وزيادات مفيدة، لكن عنده ضعف في الصنعة الحديثية، ويُعوض هذا النقص بغيره.
شرح نزهة النظر للحافظ ابن حجر https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEmljxYZ3_CI&si=RjtQ-fEKfC9v3AHB
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ahlullhadith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 93 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“د. سعد الشيخ” (@ahlullhadith), 6,092 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahlullhadith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.