Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for المنهاج / تاريخ الأفكار

Channel

المنهاج / تاريخ الأفكار

@InterdisciplinaryResearch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,440subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776596224
TypeChannel
Username@InterdisciplinaryResearch
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/InterdisciplinaryResearch

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4063,4403,42311 August 2026 — 3,406 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,407 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,409 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,411 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,410 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,418 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,429 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,426 subscribers26 September 2026 — 3,440 subscribers11 August 202626 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 46 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,401–3,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:153,440+14
15 Sept 2026, 11:583,426-3
11 Sept 2026, 19:153,429+11
7 Sept 2026, 02:013,418+8
2 Sept 2026, 07:333,410-1
27 Aug 2026, 12:423,411+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:053,410-1
20 Aug 2026, 23:083,411+2
17 Aug 2026, 20:243,409-2
14 Aug 2026, 16:043,411+4
11 Aug 2026, 16:423,407+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:473,406first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3373.3%
👍1124.4%
👏12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC206 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

إعلان... ⚠️ ستنطلق يوم الأحد القادم -بإذن الله- دورة: *المهارات الأساسية في كتابة البحث العلمي: للباحثين وطلاب الدراسات العليا* 📝🔍 تقديم سعادة الدكتور: علي بن عبدالعزيز الجبيلان 🔹 🔹 (📆)ولمدة خمسة أيام... (⏰) من ٥- ٨ م 📍وهي دورة مكثفة في مهارات الكتابة العلمية 📍و بشهادات معتمدة 🔹 🔹 للتسجيل عبر الرابط🔗 : https://trainingcenter.sa/class-details/المهارات-الاساسية-في-كتابة-البحث-العلمي-للباحثين-وطلاب-الدراسات-العلي…

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

6 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC387 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC339 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

تمايز العقول قد يكون بتكامل العلوم: "العلوم والفنون يمد بعضها بعضا، فمن غاب عنه فنّ فقد غاب عنه نور فيما هو يعلمه، وحينئذ لا يكمل النظر إلا بالشمول؛ ولذلك إن النحوي الذي لا يحسن الفقه ولا المعقولات تجده قاصراً في نحوه بالنسبة لمن يعلم ذلك، وكذلك جميع الفنون". القرافي

❤3👍1

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

5 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC389 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

"لا يستقيم أن يكون صاحب فقه ليس له علم بالسنة والأحاديث، ولا صاحب حديث ليس له علم بالفقه، وليس يستقيم واحد منها إلا بالفقه". محمد بن الحسن الشيباني

👍6

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

5 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC383 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

من الجديد في منهجيات البحث العلمي وأدواته

❤1

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

1 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC669 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

كم ترك الأول للآخر!

❤6

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

21 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC919 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤3

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

13 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC≈1,180 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤3👍1👏1

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

10 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC895 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

الفراهي - حجج القرآن في سياق رده الشديد على موقف الغزالي تجاه المنطق!! وفي مقابل ذلك امتدح موقف ابن تيمية في الهدم. رحم الله الجميع

❤2

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

10 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC698 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

منطق العلوم الشرعية! العلوم الاسلامية متصالحة ومتكاملة وتفريقها عن بعضها في جزر متنافرة غير ممكن ومتعذر، والتوسع في علم منها بذاته لا يمكن دون قرع أبواب العلوم الأخرى، والوقوف - على الاقل - على مداخلها وتصورها بإجمال، أو بالتفصيل لبعض آحاد مسائلها لا سيما التي لها ارتباط وثيق بفنه، أو متجاورة معه جنبا إلى جنب لحد الخلطة والممازجة. وعلم أصول الفقه، هو عند النظر "علم أصول التشريع الاسلامي" كما يعبر بعض الفقهاء، أو ال…

❤3👍2

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

9 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC578 viewsread 11 August 2026

التعليل في المعاملات! "إذا جاز أن نثبت أحكاما تعبدية لا علة لها ولا يطلع على علتها، فإنما ذلك في غير أبواب المعاملات المالية والجنائية. فأما هذه فلا أرى أن يكون فيها تعبدي". ابن عاشور- مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

7 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC747 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

من خبايا كتاب مصاعد النظر لبرهان الدين البقاعي المؤلف رحمه الله تعامل مع مقاصد السور كعلم خاص عرّفه بقوله: «علم يعرف منه مقاصد السور»، ثم ذكر غاية العلم، وموضوعه، ومرتبته.. وهذا بناء معرفي جيد في التأسيس لا أظنه تطوَّر وأخذ حقه بعد البقاعي 👌🏻 وفي هذا الكتاب خبيئة علمية وهي التقريظ لعدد من العلماء في عصر المؤلف حول كتابه «نظم الدرر من تناسب الآي والسور»، وتضمنت فوائد علمية في غير مظانها وتقرير منهج السلف في جواز النق…

❤5

Signed محمد ح. الأنصاري

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @InterdisciplinaryResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

أفكار بحثية
@afkarbahthea · 26,482
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة د. وصفي أبو زيد
@drwasfy · 30,539
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
قناة | مِهاد الأصول
@mihad_osol · 19,389
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
مركز تفسير للدراسات القرآنية
@tafsircenter · 65,250
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
دردشة بحثية🖋📔
@dardashaat · 21,062
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
جامع البرامج الإسلامية
@jame3_baramij · 24,009
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
كناش الأنظار والفوائد
@tr728 · 22,300
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
أ.د. خالد بن منصور الدريس
@Dralderes · 36,731
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
المكتبة القانونية العربية
@klaw0 · 39,748
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
جامع الدروس العلمية
@jame3_doros · 25,130
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
أخبار الدراسات العليا ووظائف الجامعات.
@drasatolya · 72,920
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
قناة د/ سلطان العميري
@sutanalomairi · 37,762
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
معركة طوفان الأقصى
@alaqsa_6ofan · 34,961
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
الأعمال الكاملة
@a3malkamila · 87,047
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
الدليل المقنع شرح زاد المستقنع-للمنتهين-
@dalilalfgh · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 October 2026
قناة || عبدالله السليمان
@KNASH333 · 20,119
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
المكتبة القرآنية
@Mishref_Quran · 61,422
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
قناة سليمان بن ناصر العبودي
@so_alobodi · 20,366
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“المنهاج / تاريخ الأفكار” (@InterdisciplinaryResearch), 3,440 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InterdisciplinaryResearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.