Channel
@LotfiELtokhi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,589subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001701870705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LotfiELtokhi |
| Description | مهتم ببناء الذات وتطويرها من منظور الوحي، وبالتخطيط والإنتاجية، وبما يرفع من كفاءة الفرد. قناة الصوتيات: @SawtiyyatLotfiELtokhi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LotfiELtokhi |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 24,589 | +15 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 24,574 | +39 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 24,535 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 24,537 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 24,538 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 24,541 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 24,551 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 24,557 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:48 | 24,571 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 24,587 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 24,591 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 24,592 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 24,591 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 24,589 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 24,592 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 24,585 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 24,577 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 24,570 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 24,557 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 24,551 | first reading |
105 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (26 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 170,370 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ما التقيتُ وأخي فوزي إلا وتجدد نشاطي، وازداد إيماني، وضحكتُ من قلبي! نلتقي، نلعب، ونأكل، ونمزح، ونتذكر الآخرة، ونتكلم في أمورنا وأمور دنيانا، ونشارك مشاعرنا، فأرجع البيت بنفسية غير التي خرجت بها ولله الحمد لله والمنة. أخي محمود صديق وأخ يغني عن ألف من غيره من الإخواة والأصدقاء، وله في قلبي مكانة لا ينازعه فيها إلّا ٤ من إخواني. وله مواقف دقيقة ورقيقة أحسن لي فيها وحرص فيها عليّ، وكل خيرٍ يتذوقه = يحب أن يشركني فيه…
#فوائد_واقتباسات #ابن_رجب #تزكية نص بديع لابن رجب يفتت الكمالية التي تحول بين الشروع في التوبة والتخفف من الذنوب 👇 "كثيرٌ من الذنوب قد يكون سبب وقوعه جهل فاعله بحقيقة قبحه [أي قبح الذنب]، وبغض الله له، وتفاصيل الوعيد عليه، وإن كان عالما بأصل تحريمه وقبحه، لكنه يكون جاهلا بما ورد فيه من التغليظ والتشديد ونهاية القبح، فجهله بذلك هو الذي جرَّأه عليه وأوقعه فيه، ولو كان عالمًا بحقيقةِ قبحه لأوجَب ذلك العلمُ تركَه خشيةً…
حين تنكسر نفسك وترهقك الهموم فلا تجعل عباداتك وطلبك العلم أول الضحايا. لا تدري؛ ربما يريد الله أن يراك وأنت تعبده وتطلب العلم في ضيقك كما رآك تفعل وقت سعتك.
لا شك أن أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي فتحٌ من الله، والاستعانة بها -بحثًا وتعليمًا ومدارسةً- من تمام العقل .. لكن هذا شيء، وتشبّع المرء من خلالها بما لم يُعْطَ شيءٌ آخر، فهي أدواتٌ للتتبُّع وليست مسالكَ للتشبُّع. ولا حرجَ على الباحث أن يطلب منها كتابةَ آلاف الصفحات لينتفع بقراءتها والبناء على مادتها وتخليق أفكار من استقراءاتها وإحصاءاتها، شأنه في ذلك شأن من يطالع المصادر والموسوعات ليقوّم فكره ويدعّم بحثه، لكن أن ينشئَ …
هناك مواقف تحصل لك بين الفينة والأخرى تشعرك أنك رجعت ١٠ خطوات للوراء في أمور كنت قطعت أشواطا في تزكيتها والعمل عليها في نفسك... لا تستسلم لهذا الشعور، ولا تظننّ أنّ ما مضى من بذل هو جهد مُهدر؛ فلا هو مهدر عند الله، ولا هو مهدر في نفس ذات الأمر الذي تسعى للعمل عليه! فقط اعطِ لنفسك مساحة تمر بالتجربة الشعورية الحالية، وتعلم منها، وابحث الأسباب، واستعن بالله وأكمل العمل وأنت موقن أنك لم تبدأ من الصفر أو أنّ جهودَك الس…
خدوا بصة 👌
كام Planner اشتريتها وبدأت فيها بحماس… وبطلت بعد أسبوعين؟ 🤔 في الأول كل حاجة ماشية تمام. بتكتب، ترتب، وتعلّم على المهام. بعدها يفوت يوم… يومين… أسبوع. ترجع تفتح الـ Planner فتلاقي ،صفحات فاضية وتواريخ عدّت، وبدل ما يساعدك ترجع، تحس إنك بالفعل اتأخرت. وده بالضبط اللي حاولنا نتجنبه في دفتر الإنجاز من سديم. الدفتر غير مؤرخ، وتصميمه هادي من غير تفاصيل زيادة تفرض عليك شكل معين ليومك. فاتك يوم؟ أسبوع؟ حتى شهر؟ ارجع وافت…
روعةٌ وإبداعٌ أخّاذ! https://youtu.be/oqkYKZgCAyk?si=7tBA81DvY1Tt_h03
من الأمور التي أضعها ضمن مهامي وأحرص أن أقوم بها بشكل منتظم = تشجيع أصحابي ومعارفي على الأعمال التي يقومون بها، لا سيما أهل نشر العلم والمحتوى النافع. وأتقرب بهذا إلى الله؛ فكم من تشجيع كان سببا في زيادة نشاط صاحب البذل والعمل، فيزداد الخير وينتشر، وكم من نقض (لا نقد) وتثبيط كان سببا في انقطاع الخيرات. والعاقل الموفَّق مَن أعان كلَّ ساعٍ في نشر الخير، بالتشجيع والثناء والنشر والنصيحة... إلخ، وابتغى بهذا الصنيع وجهَ…
بارك الله في قلم الدكتورة هدى النمر، وعقلها، ونضجها، ورحمتها، وعمق طرحها، وشموليته، وتأصيله، وانطلاقه من مركزية الوحي، وجزاها خيرًا عن كل ما تقدّمه وبارك لها فيه وكتب له القَبول! وحريُّ بالقارئ وطالب العلم أن يقرأ كتبَها، فهي -للأسف- لم تأخذ حقّها كما ينبغي بين أوساط الشباب والقراء.
نفس ملاحظتي الشخصية
ملاحظة قد لا تبدو دقيقة جداً، لكنها مهمة: وجدت الذين يبحثون المسائل من خلال الكتب الورقية أكثر دقة وأعمق معرفة وأجود استيعاباً من الذين يبحثونها من خلال الكتب الالكترونية. لا أعلم: هل يوجد من تطرق لهذه المسألة تحديداً؟ هل لها مناقشة علمية؟
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @LotfiELtokhi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@LotfiELtokhi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لطفي أحمد الطوخي🔻” (@LotfiELtokhi), 24,589 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LotfiELtokhi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.