11 measurements spanning 12 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,359–16,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 14:03
16,490
+56
17 Aug 2026, 11:52
16,434
+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:18
16,432
-2
14 Aug 2026, 14:05
16,434
+5
13 Aug 2026, 05:07
16,429
+4
12 Aug 2026, 06:35
16,425
-4
11 Aug 2026, 07:25
16,429
+30
10 Aug 2026, 05:22
16,399
+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:22
16,395
+8
7 Aug 2026, 01:36
16,387
+11
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
16,376
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.4%
avg views ÷ 16,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,830
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
23 (9 May 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
34,160
Reactions total
900
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
103
Videos
11
Links
52
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,917 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,175
74.6%
👍
304
10.4%
😢
275
9.43%
🔥
119
4.08%
🤩
34
1.17%
😁
8
0.274%
😱
2
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,917reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ayuobh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
لم أسترح يومًا إلى القراءة من غير الكتاب المطبوع، وما زلت إن احتجت إلى كتاب عانيت في تَطْلابِه حتى أناله، فلا أجد نفسي تقنع أن القراءة من الكتاب المصوّر تنفعها!
وليس ذلك لعلةٍ في الكتاب المصور من مثل تعب العين أو عسر التقليب، بل لِما يحدثه من قطيعة مع الكتاب الورقي، وهو شيء لا أجد نفسي تقبله، فهو الأصل في القراءة والتعلم ما دام في الدنيا شيء اسمه كتاب.
لكني وجدت عناءًا في سفري وتنقلي وساعات خروجي إذا طالتْ، فإما أن…
وقيل: عملُ الشعرِ على الحاذق به أشدُّ مِن نقْلِ الصخر. ويقال: إن الشعر كالبحر؛ أهْوَنُ ما يكون على الجاهلِ، أهْوَلُ ما يكون على العالِم. وأتْعَبُ أصحابِه قلبًا مَن عرفه حقَّ معرفته.
العمدة لابن رشيق.
اثنانِ ليس لهما صاحب: الجَحُود والمَلول.
أمَّا أحدهما فالإحسان إليه مكفور، والتقصير معه منشور، ولا يُطمع -مع ذلك- في نفعه، وعسى أن تُكفى ضرَّه.
وأمَّا الآخر فصحبته لك على حرْف، إذا مَلَّكَ مَجَّك، وإذا ملَّ غيرَك رجع إليك.
والصُّحبة بالمُوافَقة والمُواقَفة.
ورُبَّ صاحبٍ تفقده عينُك الزمانَ الممتدّ، فإنْ أردتَّه وجدتَّه كالنَّفَس المرتدّ.
ورُبَّ قريبِ المكانِ بعيدُ المكانة، تحسبه مَوْئلًا، حتى إذا جئته لم تجدْه شيئ…
قال سيبويه: "هذا باب ما ينتصب من المصادر لأنه حال صار فيه المذكور، وذلك قولك: أمَّا سِمَنًا فسمين، وأمَّا عِلما فعالم".
قال السيرافي في شرحه: "هذا الباب فيه صعوبة، ولذلك قال الزجاج: هذا الباب لم يفهمه أحد إلا الخليل وسيبويه".
قال المازني: "حدثني الأخفش قال: حضرت مجلس الخليل، فجاءه سيبويه فسأله عن مسألة وفسّرها له الخليل، فلم أفهم ما قالا، فقمت وجلست له في الطريق فقلت له: جعلني الله فداءك، سألتَ الخليل عن مسألة فلم …
#نفثة
في كل ليلٍ للجوى غارةٌ
تذودُ عني مُقلتيَ النَّوْما
حتى رأى مني الجوى جلَدًا
فكَرَّ مع جيشٍ من الحُمَّى
وما سلاحي غيرُ مِلْحَفَةٍ
تُخال مِن ضَمِّي لها أُمَّا
لا يستقرُّ جانبٌ بي كأنْـ
ـنني التحفتُ لهبًا مُحْمَى
كأنني سِيخٌ يُقلِّبهُ
شاوٍ يَؤمُّ النارَ بي أمَّا
تَلْزمني الليلَ، سوى ساعةٍ
أَأُدركُ النومَ بها أم ما؟
#نفثة
لن تَنتهي ما عِشْتَ مِن حاجاتِها
تَفْنى، وما أَفْنيتَ مِن طَمَعاتِها
تِلْقامَةٌ غَرْثى، ولا تَرضى وإنْ
ألقيتَ ما ألقيتَ في لَهَواتِها
ولو امتطيتَ الرِّيحَ في إرضائها
أَعْيَتْ ولم تَبلُغْ مَدى غاياتِها
يَكفيك مِن سَوْءاتِها أنَّ الفتى
إنْ صار عبدًا عُدَّ مِن حسناتِها
شَقِيَ امرؤٌ يسعى لِيَطْلبَ صَفْوَها
أنَّى وقد جُبِلَتْ على كَدَراتِها!
فإذا أَرَدتَّ سلامةً وغنيمةً
فاقبَلْ لياليَها على عِلَّاتِها
ولِعَيْ…
#نفثة
انتبهت الآن أنَّ اليوم آخر أيام العام، فرجعتُ بصَري في أيام عامي، فأخذتني حسرةٌ، ثم رجعتُ بصري في أيام أعوامي، فأخذتني حسرات، فما أطولَ -يا أيوبُ- أمَلَك، وما أقصَرَ أجَلَك!
شرّقَ بي الفِكر وغرَّب، وغارَ بي الهمُّ وأنجد، فوجدت في سجِلِّ نفسي ما أنستْنيه الأيام، فما أغْفَلَك عن نفسك!
وما سِجِلُّ نفسي إلا شعري، فمنه المستور، ستَرَه الله! ومنه المكشوف، لا كشفَ الله عنك سترًا!
وجدتُني كتبت قصيدة لما بلغت العشري…
من عادة الزمخشري في كتابه "أساس البلاغة"، أنَّه يختم المادَّة بتراكيبَ موجَزةٍ، من اختياره أو إنشائه، مُضَمَّنةٍ مفردةً تتَّصل بالمادة التي يُفسِّرها. وفي هذه الخواتيم لطائف وطرائف وفوائد.
ومن لطيف هذه الخواتيم قوله في ختام مادَّة (ب و ب): "و(بَوَّبَ المصنِّفُ كتابَه)، و(كتابٌ مُبَوَّبٌ)، وتراجم أبواب سيبويه عظيمةُ النَّفْع".
وذلك كما ذكر، فتراجم أبواب سيبويه ليست من قبيل العنوانات والحدود التي استقرَّتْ عليها كتب …
❤60👍7
Signed أيوب الجهني
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ayuobh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 26,302 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أيوب الجهني” (@ayuobh), 16,490 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayuobh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
