Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محمد طيب باي

Channel

محمد طيب باي

@mohamedtayebbey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,084subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677486744
TypeChannel
Username@mohamedtayebbey
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mohamedtayebbey

Growth

16,04216,09016,0668 August 2026 — 16,090 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,089 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,068 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,063 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,052 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,042 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,059 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,084 subscribers16,0848 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,035–16,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:3416,084+25
14 Aug 2026, 20:1816,059+17
13 Aug 2026, 14:1716,042-10
12 Aug 2026, 14:2716,052-11
11 Aug 2026, 16:3116,063-5
10 Aug 2026, 17:4816,068-20
9 Aug 2026, 17:4216,088-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:5116,089-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:4716,090first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.81%
avg views ÷ 16,084 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held62 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total67,958
Reactions total1,575
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,575 reactions across 62 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,18475.2%
😢1479.33%
👍1026.48%
😁563.56%
🥰412.60%
👏271.71%
🔥60.381%
🤔60.381%
🥴50.317%
😱10.063%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,575reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC300 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

"إذا قررت أن تكون ضمادة جرح لأحد = تذكر أن الضمادات ترمى عندما يلتئم الجرح"

14😢4🥴3👍1

15 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC389 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026

أذكر أثناء حفظي للقرآن الكريم كنت أقرأ في كتاب (زاد المعاد)للإمام ابن القيم . فقرأت عن (غزوة تبوك) ورأيت ما فيها من العجائب فاتجهت مباشرة إلى سورة التوبة وتركت ترتيب الحفظ فأقبلت عليها وحفظتها بطعم مختلف وما زلت عند قراءتها أعيش في عالم آخر .. فهم المعاني قبل الحفظ بديع الأثر !! صابر عبد الحكيم

26🥰7👍4🔥3

15 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC477 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تم إلغاء التعليقات

👍11😢6👏51🥴1

15 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC524 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026

قال الصحابي الجليل سلمان الفارسي رضي الله تعالى عنه: "إذا أراد الله بعبد هلاكًا نزع منه الحياء فإذا نزع منه الحياء لم تلقه إلا مقيتًا ممقتًا".

9🥰9👏2

15 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC623 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

من صاحب هذه المقدمة وما اسم الكتاب ؟ 🙂 الحمد لله الذي جعل الأرض مهادا، والجبال أوتادا، وبث من ذلك نشوزا ووهادا، وصحاري وبلادا، ثم فجر خلال ذلك أنهارا، وأسال أودية وبحارا، وهدى عباده إلى اتخاذ المساكن، وإحكام الأبنية والمواطن، فشيدوا البنيان، وعمروا البلدان، ونحتوا من الجبال بيوتا، واستنبطوا آبارا وقلوتا، وجعل حرصهم على تشييد ما شيدوا، وإحكام ما بنوا وعمدوا، عبرة للغافلين، وتبصرة للغابرين، فقال وهو أصدق القائلين :"

9🔥1🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC655 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @so_alobodi

لا ينبغي لمن يقرأ نصف صفحة ثم يسارق النظر في هاتفه أن يشتكي من ضعف الإنجاز وكثرة النسيان، فقد كان أهل العلم قديمًا يتطلبون البعد عن الملهيات زمن الحفظ وأوان التحصيل، قال ابن الجوزي: لا يُحمد الحفظ بحضرةِ خضرة، وعلى شاطئ نهر؛ لأن ذلك يلهي. والجوال أشد وطأة على القلب مما ذكر.

29😢4🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC818 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

....... فالنتائج تخضع لعلاقات القوة في آخر المطاف، الأقوى معرفيا وماديا واحتماعيا هو الأقدر على فرض تعريفاته ومعانيه وتأويلاته، ومن ثم التحكم والتوجيه والسيطرة، أهو جهاد مشروع أم إرهاب؟ أهو نضال أم تخريب؟ أهو احتلال واغتصاب أم حقوق متنازع عليها ؟ أهو غزو ثقافي واستلاب أم تبادل ثقافي وانفتاح ؟ أهو إعتدال أم إذعان ؟ أهو ثورة أم تمرد وشغب وفوضى ؟ أهي حرية الرأي أم إساءة عنصرية وخطاب كراهية وتحريض ؟! هنا تصبح اللغة وا

11

14 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC781 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

وليد سيف متحدثا عن حرب 1967 : " كل تلك المجادلات في الفكر و السياسية والفلسفة والأدب، لم تحصن الكثير من أصحابها من الانجراف مع العواطف والأوهام، ولم تؤهلهم للنظر العقلاني في شروط النصر والهزيمة، وكان على الجميع أن ينتظروا حتى ينقشع الغبار عن حقائق الهزيمة المروعة في أيام معدودات، فيكتشفوا الحكمة بأثر رجعي كالعادة، فيرجعوا على ما كان بالتحليل والنقد حتى جلد الذات، كان الإعلام العتيد يتحدث عن الحرب المظفرة التي تشنها ا

5

13 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC921 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026

{ لَّقَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ فِي رَسُولِ اللَّهِ أُسْوَةٌ حَسَنَةٌ لِّمَن كَانَ يَرْجُو اللَّهَ وَالْيَوْمَ الْآخِرَ وَذَكَرَ اللَّهَ كَثِيرًا (21) }. [سورة الأحزاب]

26

13 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,030 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

لَمْ يُخْلَقِ الدَّمْعُ لامْرِئٍ عَبَثًا اللهُ أدْرَى بِلَوْعَةِ الحَزَنِ! ابن الرومي.

21😢4👍2👏1

13 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,140 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

هذه كتب الأديب العظيم الذي يقرأ في اليوم مائة صفحة على مدار ستين سنة!

44🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @mohamedtayebbey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 383,402 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محمد طيب باي” (@mohamedtayebbey), 16,084 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohamedtayebbey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.