화장품은 바르는반도체닷
❤15🔥3

Channel
@vinil_11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,889subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002563433135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vinil_11 |
| Description | 24시간 1조 1교대 코인충(이였던) 비닐봉지의 삶 21.04~26.01 crpyto 26.02~ stock |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vinil_11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 5,889 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 5,866 | +37 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:10 | 5,829 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 5,824 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 5,824 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 117,700 |
| Reactions total | 1,455 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,455 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,037 | 71.3% | |
| 👍 | 281 | 19.3% | |
| 😱 | 46 | 3.16% | |
| 🙏 | 41 | 2.82% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 1.79% | |
| 👀 | 17 | 1.17% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,455reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
화장품은 바르는반도체닷
❤15🔥3
루멘텀($LITE) 2026 회계연도 4분기 실적 매출액: 10억 1,000만 달러 (예상치: 9억 8,800만 달러) 조정 EPS: $3.23 (예상치: $2.97) / 전년 동기 대비(YoY) +267% 조정 EBITDA: 4억 640만 달러 다음 분기(Q1) 가이던스 매출액: 12억 3,000만 ~ 12억 8,000만 달러 (예상치: 11억 6,000만 달러) 조정 EPS: $4.05 ~ $4.35 (예상치: $3.61) Non-GAAP 영업이익률: 39.5% ~ 40.5% 부문별 순매출액 부품(Components): 6억 4,940만 달러 시스템(Systems): 3억 5,690만 달러 기타 4분기 지표 GAAP EPS: -$84.65 (78억 달러 규모의 일회성 비현금성 부채상환손실 포함) Non-GAAP 매출총이익률: 5…
❤20
나중에도 이런 상황이 나올 때 시나리오도 짜놓고 있어야할듯 국장으로 치면 코스닥 같은 상황이였던거지
👍42❤2
조금은 낙관적인 장기 뷰 - 오프웨이트 모델 약진과 폐쇄형 랩스의 컴퓨팅 용량이 부족한 상황이 지속 - 앤스로픽 9월말~10월 IPO (추가 자금 조달) - 26년 3~5월 실적과 무관하게 과도한 AI 공포에 하락했던 SW 기업들의 재평가로 마켓 쏠림 현상 완화 - 엔비디아 금융권과 5,000억 달러 컴퓨팅 파워 구매 펀드 조성으로 일부 벤더 파이낸싱 우려 완화 - 급격한 엔화 언와인딩보다 장기적으로 엔화 강세, 달러 약세를 모색하겠다는 미국 정부의 의지 - SEC의 데이터센터 유동화증권 ABS 제외 (데이터센터 자본 회전 속도가 빨리질듯) - 원화 강세 (지금은 한국 주식에 안 좋은 영향을 미치겠지만 언젠가 한국 증시가 턴 어라운드 할 수 있는 key) 위 사례들을 종합해보았을 때 현재 시점이 어느 국면에 있는지 파악해보고 포…
❤26
https://m.dcinside.com/board/stockus/17390686?recommend=1 국장이 국장한다
😢19❤3
그러니까 주칸 관점에 따르면 6월 30일 하닉 270에 2배레버 풀롱치고 하닉 145에 풀숏 치라 한거죠? 광통신도 8월8일 롱콜 했으니까 루멘텀기준 평단 900달러에 지금 물려있는거고. 진짜 레전드 인간지표네
❤42😱14
음 이녀석 개못하는거 확인
👍31😱4🙏3❤2
루멘텀 붐 잠깐 접어둘게요 루멘텀 코히런트 코닝 광 3형제는 일단 개장전에 다 던졌고 유일하게 남은건 마벨
👍24😱9❤6
쭉 내려서 보시길 아 대한광통신 너무 잘가는데 없어서 괴롭다..
❤39
어제 술먹는 도중이라 보고도 그냥 대충 내 의견 쓰는거에 그쳤는데 지금 다시 보니 주칸 이놈 시트리니 따까리인건 알고 있었지만 별것도 아닌 이미 알 사람들은 다 아는 내용으로 뭘 거창하게 트윗쓰고 있는거지 2번은 모르는 사람 많을지 언정 1번은 말할 것도 없고 3번도 이미 가격 상승률 둔화 나와있는건데 어이없네 공부합시다 이런애들한테 휘둘리기 싫으면 Cpo콜을 할거면 미리했어야지 저는 미리 했어요
❤67
잠은 새우잠을 자도 꿈은 고래꿈을 꾸자..너무 멋있다
❤43
다만 약간 걸리는게 몇달전에 생각했던건 메모리 이후의 차세대 먹거리는 cpo라 생각했는데 내 시나리오가 맞다는 전제하에 지금 cpo가 오르는건 메모리 섹터의 랠리가 끝났다는 얘기인데 메모리 가격상승률 둔화가 오긴했지만 결국 케파+lta로 기존의 반도체 사이클에서 탈피+주주환원으로 2차랠리가 올 수 있다고 생각하는 사람이라 광을 들고 있지만 인지부조화가 있음
❤48
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @vinil_11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@vinil_11 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 53,278 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1조 1교대” (@vinil_11), 5,889 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vinil_11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.