Channel
@chagunjami
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
289subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002922557952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chagunjami |
| Description | 공지방, 일기방 : https://t.me/chagunjami 채팅방 : https://t.me/jamichattt |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chagunjami |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 289 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 289 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 November 2025 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[HBAR 아비트라지] 1. 7/11 Hedera 네트워크에서 해킹 이슈가 터짐 2. 해킹 이슈가 터졌지만 HBAR의 CEX 가격은 약 3~4% 하락에 그쳐 큰 이슈가 없어보였음 3. HBAR 메인넷의 DEX를 계속 파보니, DEX와 CEX 간 가격 차이가 5~10%까지 벌어져 있었음 4. HBAR 입금이 가능한 CEX로는 OKX가 있었음 (다른 거래소는 입금 막힌 상태) 5. Binance에서 HBAR 네트워크로 USDC를 전송 → DEX에서 HBAR 매수 → CEX(OKX) 입금 순으로 아비트라지 진행 아쉬운 점 WBTC 가격을 보면 $44,000까지 다녀온 것으로 보임. 초반에는 유동성이 있었지만 이후 회수된 것으로 추정됨. 이 기회를 조금 더 빨리 포착했다면 어땠을까 하는 아쉬움이 남음
opensea base boost 진행중이네요. 전 이번시즌에도 ember까지만.
👍1
스테이블 예치작 할 게 너무 많아서 돈을 어떻게 분배해야 할지 모르겠음. 일단 내가 예상하는 TGE 순서대로 넣었다 뺐다가 할지, 초기인 거 노려서 초반에 캐놓고 다음거 YT 굴리면서 돌릴지 Theo(12월초) @Theo_Network $20M 규모, 월가 묻었고 아무리 늦어도 1월이라 생각하는데 11월은 펜들 만기 일자 생각하면 생각보다 금방 TGE 할 거 같은 느낌, 야핑은 상위 25명이라(월간) top 250명이라 괜찮아 보이지만 한국 전용 할당이 아니라 힘들어보이고 solsticefi(12월말) @solsticefi 솔라나에서도 스테이블 메타 하나쯤 터질 때 됐다고 보는데 얘만한 프로덕트는 안보임, 9월30일에 포인트제 시작했고 포인트 에어드랍에 이미 7.5% 할당했다고 언급했고 12월 TGE 예정도 되어있음. 꼭 참여해야 할…
20% TGE떄 주고 vesting 30일 있는데, 이제껏 bio 런치패드는 항상 5배 이상이여서.. 특이한점은 이전에는 $bio로 런패 참여했는데, 이번엔 써클로 하네요. 이를 참고해서 11/21 오후에 넣어보면 될듯
11/21 오후 8시까지니, 최대한 간보면서 모아놨던 XP 넣으면될듯
bio 런치패드하네요.. 지금 와서 무슨 의미있을까 싶은데 XP 모아놨던건 많길래 들어가볼랍니다.
💰 STABLE 환불 시작 https://app.merkl.xyz/users/ 44%로 생각보다 더 높게 할당해주고, 55%에 대한 환불 진행중. 야락장에 스테이블로 있게 해줘서 고맙다..이제 반등장에 TGE해서 멕여줘
https://x.com/monghyun523/status/1990342320018133272?s=20 일당 30k 상호 리트윗 좋아요좀요
부산 limitless pnl 1등으로 에어팟범 야호
❤3👍3😐1
어라..
🧡 BasedOne, 폴리마켓과 협업 🔜베이스드가 폴리마켓과 협업으로 예측시장 거래를 할 수 있는 feature 제공 🔜모바일 어플(ios, aos) 및 웹터미널에 탑재되며, 특히 BasedPal nft 에 예측시장 거래 관련 ai agent 유틸리티 탑재 🔜단순 협업이 아닌 기능을 공유(유동성 및 결제 시스템 등)하고 제품화 했다는 점이 강점. 이정도 유틸이면 시총 1b 넘겨도 이상하지 않을듯? https://x.com/BasedOneX/status/1988616068781187073?t=NVRlWBcEJleD39aHzMdp2Q&s=19
엘리자 따먹기 상호좀요 https://x.com/monghyun523/status/1988430076241989691?s=20
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chagunjami. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@chagunjami named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“자미의 차근차근” (@chagunjami), 289 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chagunjami.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.