Channel
@dsgnlizer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
304subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001375756780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsgnlizer |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsgnlizer |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 304 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 303 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 305 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 306 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 306 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
129 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 43.4% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 30.2% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| 🍾 | 10 | 7.75% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А если сил/времени на прохождение чего-то большого нет, видео от Романа Крихели, как вдохнуть жизнь в себя, если в каком-то деле ты уже мастер, зачем нужно возвращаться к вайбу "новичка", чтобы не костенеть и расширять свой профиль дальше основной профессии, в которой вы начали и уже стали в ней мастером https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCtNvkLnac4
👍2🔥1
Для тех кто подустал и хочет вернуться к истокам професии — креативности, вдохновению и возможности смотреть "под другим углом" на вещи, несу 2 классные находки Бесплатный курс "Radical Creativity" от Aalto University’s School of Arts https://divingintoradicalcreativity.aalto.fi/ Очень вдохновляющие видео о креативном мышлении, процессе, коллаборации, поиске решений и экспериментах
🔥2
Оминь!
❤1
При внедрении в работу ИИ важно не просто добавлять контроль над ИИ к уже существующим обязанностям. Это увеличивает когнитивную нагрузку, а не уменьшает её. Важно учитывать пределы человеческого внимания и перепроектировать рабочий процесс: решать, какие задачи ИИ забирает полностью, какие остаются за человеком и от чего сотрудника можно освободить взамен
❤6💯3
Что такое IxDF? Знаете Дона Нормана? Ну который "Дизайн привычных вещей" написал. Это была одна из первых книг по дизайну, которая меня сильно впечатлила и сформировала мышление. А еще есть Nielsen Norman Group (тоже его детище), где собраны самые цитируемые и уважаемые исследования по дизайну. Они пионеры в своем деле. Так вот, Дон Норман — один из членов борда IxDF. Курсы IxDF стоят смешные 120$ в год, и именно б…
❤4🔥3
Сегодня ударили по рукам с IxDF! Теперь официально буду пробовать роль Local Leader коммьюнити дизайнеров в Тбилиси, а значит буду собирать тех, кто здесь, на кофеек, воркшопы, может быть на природу, чтобы мы могли знакомиться друг с другом и обмениваться опытом 🫰🏼💥 Очень рада такой возможности и доверию, ждите анонсы мероприятий!
🍾10❤5
Продолжаю глубже изучать матчасть UX и пользовательского поведения На просторах LinkedIn нашла очень подробную схему того, какие психологические паттерны влияют на принятие решений Внутри собрано 1000 когнитивных паттернов и примеров их использования Это прямо таки визуальный справочник, чтобы лучше понимать, как когнитивные паттерны влияют на поведение пользователей и как учитывать их при проектировании интерфейс…
👍7❤3🔥2
Broadened my horizons — начала вести LinkedIn на английском. Личный бренд — важный карьерный актив Долго прокрастинировала это занятие, и вот, наконец, работа в международной компании подталкивает к тому, чтобы писать на английском. Написала первый англ-пост о том, как мне работается в Snoonu, и он очень хорошо продвинулся алгоритмами за счет того, что многие ребята из компании быстро накидали реакций. За пару дней …
❤8🔥7
Жду, когда стартапы и фичи перестанут уже маркироваться AI-native. Для каждой технологии наступает время, когда она становится привычным, рутинным инструментом, что подсвечивать его становится уже бессмысленно, как и писать, что это Figma-native дизайн, No-code платформа и так далее Последние 5 лет стартапы и корпы при анонсах чего-то нового, часто начинали разговор с того, что это AI-native продукт. Хочется, чтобы …
💯9
Вам сложно принимать критику?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сложно ли вам делиться фидбеком?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как у вас дела с критикой?
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dsgnlizer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вам сложно принимать критику?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сложно ли вам делиться фидбеком?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dsgn, liizzzer!” (@dsgnlizer), 304 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsgnlizer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.