Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Наташа пишет про IT

@natti_jun_front

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,112subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765456928
TypeChannel
Username@natti_jun_front
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/natti_jun_front

Growth

7,1127,1347,1236 August 2026 — 7,134 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,121 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,112 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,109–7,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:277,112-9
9 Aug 2026, 11:317,121-13
6 Aug 2026, 05:107,134no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:517,134first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.2%
avg views ÷ 7,112 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (22 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total19,440
Reactions total841
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,489 reactions across 13 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76451.3%
💯21414.4%
👍20713.9%
❤‍🔥1379.20%
🔥493.29%
👏261.75%
😁241.61%
🤪140.94%
🥰140.94%
👀70.47%
👻60.403%
50.336%
🤯50.336%
30.201%
🎉30.201%
🤝30.201%
💔20.134%
💘20.134%
🤔20.134%
🎃10.067%
1 further kind10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,628reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
214
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 15 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
108
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natti_jun_front. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,030 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

IT и СДВГ: как я адаптировалась https://youtu.be/Nvl26pEHd3k https://youtu.be/Nvl26pEHd3k https://youtu.be/Nvl26pEHd3k Несколько лет назад мне поставили диагноз СДВГ. Он объяснил особенности, с которыми я не понимала, как быть, за которые ругала себя и считала неправильной. Потом я прошла тренинг навыков для СДВГ-шников, часть симптомов компенсировала, с частью до сих пор учусь обращаться, и хочу с вами поделитьс

❤‍🔥319🤪2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,750 views143 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026

Наташа, ты не умеешь выебываться Сказали мне недавно. Сначала я скукурузила лицо и оскорбилась в лучших чувствах, мол, все я умею, вон у меня блог, то и сё. Человек продолжил: - Наташа, а вот ты делала 3 благотворительных ивента по фронту, один на 150+ человек, сама одна. Кто об этом знает? Никто 🤌 Если бы я это делал, у меня бы были в курсе гольфист, японский онанист и та дверца, а еще я бы повесил баннер прям н

97❤‍🔥21💯16👍3💘2🤝2🥰2

4 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Друзья, а вот вам вопрос. Я пишу, в основном, чистые лонгриды, но могу, в принципе, делать контент еще кружочками и карточками. Хотите кружочки и посты с карточками? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа)

  1. Хочу кружочки20%
  2. Хочу карточки52%
  3. Хочу только текстовые посты58%
  4. Хочу что-то еще (пишу в комменты)2%
  5. Тык результаты посмотреть12%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,810 views66 reactions25 Starsread 12 August 2026

Про overqualified-отказы Давно хотела затронуть тему, но к слову не приходилось, а тема важная, хоть и неприятная. ➖Что имеется в виду под overqualified Представим ситуацию: есть вы с, например, 10 годами опыта, есть вакансия на сеньора с "5+ лет опыта", вы подаетесь и уверены, что не ответить не могут, у вас вдвое больше опыта, чем требуется, да они должны спасибо сказать, что вы на них посмотрели. А они, вместо

43👍14❤‍🔥4🥰3👏1🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC≈2,120 views95 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026

Про ответственность без прав Недавно я проходила закрытый карьерный воркшоп, и там был очень любопытный момент. Обсуждали ошибки продактов с лидом продактов в одном бигтехе. И он сказал такую вещь (если вольно цитировать): "Мы ожидаем от сеньор-разрабов, что они будут вместе с продактами нести ответственность за результат, и, если фича или проект провалились, ответственность общая". В еще одном бигтехе концепт фи

74👍105👏3💯2🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC≈4,670 views243 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Господа курсоделы и инфлюэнсеры, не забываем, что вас смотрят, читают и у вас учатся не только мальчики, но и девочки. Я не "описал", я "описала". Я не "привел", я "привела". Чтобы избежать таких коллизий в русском языке, достаточно заменить "ты" на "вы" (что проще) или использовать пассивный залог и другие конструкции (что чуть сложнее). Например: "классно подмечено" или "корректно описано", или "приведены хороши

👍12050💯49🤪12😁5👻3❤‍🔥1🎃1

20 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC≈3,330 views190 reactions15 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про айтишный снобизм и элитаризм На днях со мной произошел твит со скрина, который я некоторое время переваривала и собирала мысли в кучку. Давайте, обсудим. Это предложение выглядит абсурдным, но я уже не раз такое встречала, и хочется разобрать по косточкам проблематику и идею, а не только поворчать, какая автор редиска. Итак, чем же плоха идея платить работодателю за стажировку. ➖Повышение элитаризма в профес

💯11645👏18🤯5🔥3😁2👍1

17 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,950 views61 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чему училась в неделю #1 А вот обещала рассказывать, чему учусь, так что выполняю обещание. Во-первых, на работке мне купили курс по FSD. Можно ли просто пойти доку почитать? Разумеется, можно, но я больше люблю видеоформат, так что, мне его взяли из бюджета на обучение. Пока только начала: смотрю секцию с базовыми подходами, что за слои, что за слайсы, что концептуально из себя FSD представляет. Из плюсов: объяс

❤‍🔥3219👍5👀3🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC≈2,940 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как мне AI-шка в учебе помогает Перед тем, как рассказать, чему я училась на прошлой неделе, хочу расписать, как я отстраиваю учебу, и чем тут может помочь ИИ-шка так, чтобы это было продуктивно. Как ее используют обычно Просят, чтобы она рассказала тему, "как для трехлетки". И вот это вообще непродуктивно в долгосрок, если мы говорим не о каких-то частностях в моменте, а именно о том, чтобы получить и систематиз

48🔥15👍12👀4🤔1

10 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC≈2,510 views69 reactions20 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про подвергание позитиву Много лет назад я ходила на групповое типирование по соционике. Надо было отвечать на всякие вопросы развернуто вслух, и тебя, в итоге, типировали. Так вот, был вопрос про "какое у вас обычно настроение", и одна дева сказала: "настроение всегда должно быть хорошим!!!". Мне это так запало в душу, потому что дурное настроение, как и физическая боль, маркер, что что-то идёт не так. Неудобно,

48💯12🔥8🥰1

9 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC≈2,330 views137 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026

Про бесявых продюсеров Каждый день мне по нескольку раз пишут продюсеры, и это просто невозможно уже, хочется достать ружье. Раньше они были прямолинейны в своем спаме: "Здравствуйте, Наташа, давайте делать курс для вашей аудитории на 10005000 миллионов денег". И не дай тебе боженька проигнорить, будут еще и пинговать постоянно. Ну да ничего, тг-архив все стерпит. Но в последние пару месяцев завелось два новых т

84💯19😁14👍6🔥6👻3🥰3💔2

6 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC≈3,190 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Frontend-пятиминутка #5: чек-лист для карточек Изначально, рубрика планировалась для коротких разборов собеседовательных вопросов, но хочется пойти чуть дальше и втащить сюда чек-листы. И сегодня будет чек-лист для карточек: товаров/услуг/новостей/блог-постов/любых вообще Что за чек-листы Это вопросы для самопроверки, которые надо задать себе, когда проектируешь тот или иной компонент, чтобы не вляпаться в против

48👍16❤‍🔥5🎉3😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @natti_jun_front. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTCAnonymous Poll491 voters

Друзья, а вот вам вопрос. Я пишу, в основном, чистые лонгриды, но могу, в принципе, делать контент еще кружочками и карточками. Хотите кружочки и посты с карточками? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа)

  1. Хочу кружочки20%
  2. Хочу карточки52%
  3. Хочу только текстовые посты58%
  4. Хочу что-то еще (пишу в комменты)2%
  5. Тык результаты посмотреть12%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,398 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Наташа пишет про IT” (@natti_jun_front), 7,112 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natti_jun_front.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.