Я Тамара, и я так живу.
Стать частью Замка: https://odonata.live/zamok
Тут про меня все: https://odonata.live/
По рекламе и сотрудничеству писать @evdokia_vas
Created
4 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,887–23,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 00:58
22,914
-23
17 Sept 2026, 09:01
22,937
-12
15 Sept 2026, 05:18
22,949
-6
13 Sept 2026, 16:21
22,955
-7
11 Sept 2026, 22:42
22,962
+5
9 Sept 2026, 14:21
22,957
-15
6 Sept 2026, 03:36
22,972
-4
3 Sept 2026, 21:00
22,976
-7
2 Sept 2026, 13:28
22,983
-2
1 Sept 2026, 12:13
22,985
-15
31 Aug 2026, 09:28
23,000
-11
30 Aug 2026, 10:48
23,011
-5
29 Aug 2026, 11:39
23,016
-1
28 Aug 2026, 13:07
23,017
+1
27 Aug 2026, 11:03
23,016
-2
26 Aug 2026, 13:15
23,018
-15
25 Aug 2026, 12:58
23,033
-4
24 Aug 2026, 15:47
23,037
-6
22 Aug 2026, 21:37
23,043
-3
21 Aug 2026, 14:08
23,046
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 22,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
71 (17 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
121,340
Reactions total
6,634
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
846
Videos
8
Links
868
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
19,775 reactions across 71 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,871
44.9%
😁
2,310
11.7%
🔥
2,242
11.3%
💯
1,754
8.87%
💔
1,082
5.47%
👍
878
4.44%
😢
370
1.87%
😭
287
1.45%
😱
255
1.29%
❤🔥
245
1.24%
🤣
242
1.22%
👏
207
1.05%
🥰
145
0.733%
🙈
142
0.718%
🤔
105
0.531%
🕊
103
0.521%
🤯
81
0.41%
👀
65
0.329%
👎
60
0.303%
😎
60
0.303%
24 further kinds
271
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,775 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.45%
6 of 71 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
5,800
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,850
over 65 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Люди, ну почему вам так нравится ненавидеть технологии? Они же такие классные, ну.
Ваш мобильник, который синхронизирует время со спутником, чтобы проорать вам на ухо вашу дурацкую любимую песню ровно в восемь утра, микроволновка, разгоняющая молекулы воды в вашем завтраке, чтобы бутер подогрелся за 30 секунд, а не минут, как было бы в классической духовке, гугл карты, которые рисуют вам пробки, чтобы вы их объехали…
И знаете, вы щас будете смеяться, но мне кажется, что всё дело в бабле. В бабле и боли, точнее.
И я это не к тому, что им платит какой-то плохой человек и теперь они все такие. Они такие сейчас, в большей массе своей, абсолютно бесплатно. От души.
Я это к тому, что им слишком долго не платили условно «хорошие».
Нищета, обездоленность и невозможность управлять своей жизнью всегда приводят к ненависти и озлобленност…
Сейчас странная история будет, но очень хочется ее рассказать.
В 2008 году мне исполнялось 18. Я была немного нелюдимой девочкой-первокурсницей с опадающим готическим макияжем, живущей преимущественно в книжках и интернете.
И тогда мне попался ходивший по ЖЖ список от Независимой Газеты о сотне романов, которые потрясли мир. Ну знаете, плох тот журнал, который не составил пару дюжин своих подобных списков.
Но тот …
Для того чтобы кричать от боли, нужно не только чувствовать боль, но и уметь кричать. Отсюда два вывода. Не все, кто громче кричит, больше страдает. Не все, кто молчат, не страдают вовсе. То же относится и к счастью, страху и любым другим эмоциям.
#odoquotes
#реклама
Продолжая полировать свой новый образ женщины достаточно-таки неприятненькой, сегодня скажу вот чего. Если не все, то где-то половина проблем человечества решается тем, чтобы люди брали на себя ответственность за то, что они делают, и осознавали последствия своих действий. Ну типа как взрослые. Только не отдельными личностями, а прям всеми дееспособными гражданами.
Тех, кто против, – обязывать законодатель…
У меня есть знакомый челик, который обладает удивительным свойством. Мы не то чтобы часто видимся, но каждый раз, когда его встречаешь, сначала чувствуешь к нему очень много тепла и искренней симпатии. Эдакий хороший мальчик из приличной семьи. Светится доброй энергией человека, чьи руки никогда да не сотворят зла. (А заодно глаза которого зла да не увидят, уши – да не услышат).
Он хорошо говорит на языках, совершен…
Все орут о том, что времени мало. Это неправда. Его на самом деле до хрена. Но его слишком просто растратить на всякую хуйню. Поэтому те, кто уже растратил, любят говорить, что только с возрастом осознали, насколько же его мало. Это позволяет им думать, что они сказали что-то умное.
Все орут о том, что время – невосполнимый ресурс и важно использовать каждую минуту с умом. Время и правда невосполнимо, но попытавшись…
Я как всегда дотянула до последнего, зарывшись во все свои проекты и нифига не заметила, как подкрался очередной дедлайн.
Завтра заканчиваем прием заявок на Узбекистан, и пока что группа подучается очень камерной, что классно, но нам бы ещё пару человек, и тогда вообще будет шикардос.
Я понимаю, что нормальные люди планируют поездки и отпуска заранее, но где нормальные, а где мы, поэтому я очень надеюсь на то, что …
❤75🔥65👍20😁4😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @od_tkh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Печатные выражения @pechat_sallyks · 26,394 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тамара, какого хрена?” (@od_tkh), 22,914 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/od_tkh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.