Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Екатерина Крупецкая об отношениях

Channel

Екатерина Крупецкая об отношениях

@krupetskaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,546subscribers

+727 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001591337546
TypeChannel
Username@krupetskaya
DescriptionПсихолог. Работаю с парами и клиентами. Веду группы и курсы. Пишу, как осознанно создавать и развивать отношения. Для связи: @ekrupetskaya Обо мне: Krupetskaya.ru Курс: iduksebe.ru Канал в реестре РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67d7765c25b58f3d790507ad
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/krupetskaya

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,81715,54615,181.56 August 202612 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +727. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,708–15,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 01:2615,546+120
10 Nov 2026, 04:1915,426-4
8 Nov 2026, 21:2015,430-10
7 Nov 2026, 11:5615,440-7
6 Nov 2026, 12:2115,447-8
5 Nov 2026, 09:4715,455-11
4 Nov 2026, 08:1415,466+2
3 Nov 2026, 07:1915,464-10
2 Nov 2026, 04:5915,474+15
1 Nov 2026, 04:2115,459-11
31 Oct 2026, 01:5815,470+18
30 Oct 2026, 01:5615,452+9
28 Oct 2026, 23:0515,443+76
27 Oct 2026, 20:2715,367+124
26 Oct 2026, 23:1715,243+18
26 Oct 2026, 01:5715,225-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:0815,226+10
24 Oct 2026, 00:5715,216+5
23 Oct 2026, 04:1615,211+49
22 Oct 2026, 07:2815,162first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 15,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held86 (20 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total68,656
Reactions total1,574
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
219
Videos
235
Links
590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17m 41s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,842 reactions across 84 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,50042.8%
👍89715.4%
🔥85414.6%
😁61410.5%
💯3986.81%
😢951.63%
🤣901.54%
🤔791.35%
💔721.23%
🕊370.633%
❤‍🔥320.548%
🙏320.548%
💘260.445%
🤯240.411%
😭180.308%
😐110.188%
👏100.171%
🤷‍♂100.171%
✍80.137%
🥰80.137%
9 further kinds270.462%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (20.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 07:48 UTC806 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Тогда сам что-то предлагай, я устала постоянно придумывать» Вчера в комментариях мы обсуждали фразу «Если хочешь, приезжай». Вроде тебе и рады, а всё равно хочется услышать: «Приезжай, я тебя жду». И я вспомнила историю, которую Анна рассказала под нашей игрой с диалогами. Она часто придумывала, куда им с мужчиной сходить, а он обычно подхватывал. Со стороны вроде всё хорошо: люди проводят время вместе, обоим нрав…

❤33👍8

11 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Хочешь его вернуть? Главное, чтобы он об этом не догадался В истории Нади мы уже видели, как Сусанна объясняла ей, что делать, чтобы заинтересовать Володю. В фильме «Французский поцелуй» за это берётся мужчина. И мне нравится, с какой серьёзностью Люк объясняет Кейт, что ей теперь делать. Кейт прилетела во Францию вернуть жениха, который влюбился в другую. Люк берётся помочь. Первый урок: никогда не показывай, как…

❤11💘1

11 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,050 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Хочешь его вернуть? Главное, чтобы он об этом не догадался В истории Нади мы уже видели, как Сусанна объясняла ей, что делать, чтобы заинтересовать Володю. В «Французском поцелуе» за это берётся мужчина. И мне нравится, с какой серьёзностью Люк объясняет Кейт, что ей теперь делать. Кейт прилетела во Францию вернуть жениха, который влюбился в другую. Люк берётся помочь. Первый урок: никогда не показывай, как сильно…

❤17💘3

10 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC≈1,440 views51 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Надя не на концерт хотела Под развязкой «Самой обаятельной и привлекательной» я спросила, что бы вы сказали Володе на месте Нади, когда он пришёл на концерт с другой девушкой (Светой). Кто-то из вас ушёл бы, как Надя, кто-то всё-таки пошёл бы в зал. А Мила придумала неординарный ход: попросить Володю уступить свой билет и пойти слушать Моранди вдвоём со Светой 🙂 А потом Маша написала: «Надя не на концерт хотела». О…

❤41👍8🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,610 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤10👍4

8 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,660 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

А вот и развязка. Володя приходит с другой девушкой. Надя уступает ей свой билет. В комментариях был вопрос: стоит ли проявлять инициативу, если тебя пока не рассматривают как возможную партнёршу? А еще была личная история от одной из комментаторов. Она рассказала, как они с симпатичным ей коллегой проводили время вместе, но каждый решил, что другому неинтересен. И только спустя годы выяснили, как ошибались в свои…

❤13🤔10🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,780 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍17😁10❤1

6 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,980 views37 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«А ты сам можешь меня куда-нибудь позвать?» Представим пару. Они встречаются несколько месяцев. Она обычно предлагает, когда и где увидеться. Он охотно соглашается. Но постепенно её начинает задевать, что приглашения почти всегда исходят от неё. — Увидимся в субботу? — Конечно. Куда хочешь сходить? — А ты сам можешь что-нибудь предложить? — Я думал, тебе нравится выбирать. — Мне хочется, чтобы ты тоже меня куда-ниб…

💘19❤12👍3🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,950 views114 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁105🔥7👍2

5 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,180 views61 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Мужчина проявил инициативу. Почему теперь хочется, чтобы он сбавил обороты? Ждать инициативы от мужчины можно долго. Но что, если он её проявит? Насколько близко вы готовы его впустить? После 40 за этим вопросом уже вполне конкретные вещи. У вас свой дом, привычки, планы на выходные. Вы знаете, как вам удобно, и помните, чего стоило наладить эту жизнь. Поэтому даже понравившемуся человеку найти в ней место бывает …

❤42👍15🤔4

5 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,990 views66 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Я первая написала. Теперь его очередь». Хочется увидеть, нужен ли другому этот разговор. Но телефон почему-то всё время под рукой, и к вечеру уже злишься, хотя человек даже не знает, что сейчас решается судьба ваших отношений. Написать ещё раз кажется почти унизительным. Вдруг решит, что навязываюсь? Или привыкнет, что я всегда сама появляюсь, и дальше можно вообще не напрягаться? Особенно трудно, если такой опыт…

❤37👍25💔4

4 Nov 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,940 views61 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

К нашему предстоящему разговору 22 ноября :) На прошлой встрече мастерской «Ближе-дальше» мы рассуждали о том, что женская инициатива может быть прямолинейной и …. более затейливой :)

😁50❤8🔥2🎉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @krupetskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@krupetskaya edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTCAnonymous Poll334 voters

Опрос Какой вопрос вы больше всего хотите разобрать подробнее?

  1. Хочу человека — или подтверждение, что меня выбрали?49%
  2. Почему меня сильнее тянет, когда партнёр отдаляется?20%
  3. Я хочу уйти от человека — или от своей роли?31%
  4. Как обстоятельства жизни изменили наши отношения?16%
  5. Есть ли между нами реальное встречное движение?24%

The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Poll646 voters

С кем у вас складывалась самая близкая дружба?

  1. 👩 С женщиной (я женщина)49%
  2. 👨 С мужчиной (я женщина)10%
  3. 👩 С женщиной (я мужчина)3%
  4. 👨 С мужчиной (я мужчина)4%
  5. 🤝 У меня были близкие друзья и мужчины, и женщины — пол не имеет значения33%
  6. 🙅 Мне кажется, что дружба между мужчиной и женщиной без романтического подтекста невозможна26%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психолог Прокопова Ольга
@olga_prokopova_s · 120,997
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Быть одной — ЗБС
@homealoneee · 27,497
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Здоровые отношения | Анна Саночкина
@sanochkina_anna · 25,122
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Инна Белова
@belovainnapsy · 77,686
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Юлия Свияш Психолог
@jsviyash · 19,182
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 109,421
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
TANIA_GOVORIT
@tania_govorit_channel · 20,712
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА - путь к процветанию
@psyaal · 38,313
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
В поиске того самого
@lvira_lina_up · 18,817
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026
Fladesire
@fladesire · 24,968
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
Кирилл Гавриличев
@gavrilichevkirill · 20,641
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
Записки какого-то мужика
@zapiski_man3 · 31,207
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Екатерина Крупецкая об отношениях” (@krupetskaya), 15,546 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krupetskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.