Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -482. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162,544–163,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:14
162,616
-97
11 Aug 2026, 00:02
162,713
-78
10 Aug 2026, 03:31
162,791
-92
9 Aug 2026, 01:13
162,883
-75
7 Aug 2026, 22:54
162,958
-70
6 Aug 2026, 20:28
163,028
-70
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
163,098
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:52
163,098
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.17%
avg views ÷ 162,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,410
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
72 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
605,394
Reactions total
10,991
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,500
Videos
≈3,600
Links
≈1,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 28s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,716 reactions across 61 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,862
19.2%
custom 5195275965470629045
1,468
15.1%
custom 5226738082677551050
863
8.88%
💔
857
8.82%
custom 5215443486920177554
795
8.18%
🔥
677
6.97%
custom 5271975023291174639
661
6.80%
😁
650
6.69%
custom 5474411237271954217
491
5.05%
✍
363
3.74%
custom 5199619281213483032
281
2.89%
custom 5452150567805693608
152
1.56%
custom 5449614965143019938
140
1.44%
custom 5451782579302737798
137
1.41%
custom 5197316049166434441
74
0.762%
custom 5231046497516153988
67
0.69%
custom 5206165833574813687
66
0.679%
custom 5222474520182416431
56
0.576%
custom 5215604861726396574
44
0.453%
🗿
12
0.124%
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,991reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.78%
2 of 72 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
8,170
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,900
over 70 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7Fj31XtGwELgh5tyTg2uF56aBXrAU2Qf
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FygGVq3pUFJFaLLakK4cQKmt2JUadrD
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Журналист из Wired запросил у Макдоналдс собранные через программу лояльности данные о себе и получил документ на 515 (!) страниц. По законам Калифорнии компания не могла проигнорировать запрос, поэтому мужик этим воспользовался.
В бургер-досье Мак спрогнозировал, что в в ближайшие полтора месяца журналист посетит рестораны сети 2,16 раза и потратит в среднем $13,49 за визит. Смешное: алгоритм изучил его профиль и о…
Американские корпорации начали превращать офисы в курорты, чтобы мотивировать трудяг вылезти с удалёнки. В Сан-Франциско появится офисный комплекс, в который вбухают сто миллионов долларов. Инвестиции уйдут на симулятор гольфа, сауну, ресторан для своих и фитнес-залы с бассейнами.
Девелоперы прозвали тренд «отелизацией офисов». Хорошего расположения теперь мало — корпорациям приходится конкурировать с дорогими бизне…
В Италии можно попасть на трюфельную охоту — за 110 евро вас довезут до леса и предоставят собаку, которая поможет искать грибы. В конце всех ждёт сытный пир на ферме.
Один билет до трюфельного рая, пожалуйста.
Блокнот и ручка — мастхэв в эпоху ИИ. Несмотря на то, что за последние 20 лет способ записей в мире трансформировался, эксперты советуют как можно чаще прибегать к дедовской практике ведения заметок от руки.
Секрет прост: блокноты помогают не только зафиксировать информацию, но привносят ясность и помогают не терять способность размышлять самостоятельно, не отдавая это дело на откуп ИИ. Для когнитивных способностей …
25-летняя девушка из Канады устроилась на работу волшебницей для богачей. Она днём и ночью на связи с теми, кто готов спустить миллионы на помпезные, но абсолютно бездумные вещи.
Оливия Ферни — сотрудница люксового тревел-агентства Top Tier Travel. Компания берёт с клиентов по 100 тысяч долларов абонентской платы, взамен обкашливая их вопросы. Найти самый большой круассан в Париже или доставить пингвина в номер — об…
В меню Макдоналдса появятся энергетические коктейли на Red Bull. Уже 17 августа сеть выпустит Red Bull Dragonberry Energizer.
В состав новинки войдут сам энергетик, сироп из малины и сублимированные кусочки питахайи. Для следящих за фигурой обещают добавить версию без без сахара 🍺
Spotify начнёт маркировать ИИ-исполнителей — их треки будут помечены тегом AI Persona и выведены из списка рекомендаций. Представители платформы отметили, что сделали это для продвижения живых артистов:
Мы считаем, что у всех артистов есть выбор в том, как они себя позиционируют, но алгоритмы Spotify направлены на продвижение музыки людей, которые строят карьеру в музыкальной индустрии.
Стриминг оставляет за исполн…
Директ и Яндекс Доставка выпустили симулятор малого бизнеса — с его рутиной, сборкой заказов и логистикой. Механика простая: ловите заказы в коробку и стараетесь не растерять жизни по пути.
Главный стимул дойти до финала — реальные промокоды от обоих сервисов. Их можно пустить на привлечение клиентов и настройку логистики, чтобы хоть немного разгрузить тайм-менеджмент. В общем, повод залипнуть в телефоне посреди дня…
Гравити Фолз вернётся с двумя новыми короткометражками! Мультфильмы выпустят в честь выхода артбука The Art of Gravity Falls — в него вошли неопубликованные концепт-арты и архивные заметки.
Алекс Хирш, не подведи.
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @boomers_TV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,052 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
лидер мнений среди удобрений @lider · 157,148 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Share @sharemed · 223,994 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
КудаМосква @kudamsk24 · 232,927 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Джейпег Малевича @malepeg · 566,438 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 August 2026
Русский ритейл и бизнес @retailrus · 293,568 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Сосисочная @sosicka · 169,249 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Игорь, начинайте работу @oplata_skoro_budet · 361,324 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Красный маркетинг Гиязова @aaaredmarketing · 280,357 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugnotfeature · 852,053 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
Бэкдор @whackdoor · 1,654,052 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
concertzaal @concertzaal · 840,211 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Ты в тренде или уходи @trendsetter · 1,312,175 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
TrendWatching @trendwatching24 · 1,473,361 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
о чём говорят коллеги @kollegi · 157,287 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
CodeCamp @codecamp · 183,094 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
ок, согласовано @notypicmarketing · 353,758 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Рестарт @remedia · 732,645 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
в IT и выйти @techmedia · 1,352,710 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Трендач @trendach · 1,492,505 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
Бескромный @dbeskromny · 155,877 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
Банки, деньги, два офшора @bankrollo · 450,998 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Романцев768 | Romancev768 @Romancev768 · 758,072 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Сегодня в тренде @trends · 1,114,868 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
Провод @provod · 1,450,300 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бумеры смотрят телек” (@boomers_TV), 162,616 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boomers_TV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.