Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -3,473. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159,104–163,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 05:16
159,625
-433
19 Sept 2026, 07:15
160,058
-135
16 Sept 2026, 18:19
160,193
-122
14 Sept 2026, 23:00
160,315
-146
13 Sept 2026, 07:59
160,461
-94
11 Sept 2026, 11:20
160,555
-173
8 Sept 2026, 15:59
160,728
-215
5 Sept 2026, 10:17
160,943
-126
3 Sept 2026, 13:19
161,069
-88
2 Sept 2026, 08:05
161,157
-78
1 Sept 2026, 09:16
161,235
-54
31 Aug 2026, 11:35
161,289
-58
30 Aug 2026, 14:04
161,347
-55
29 Aug 2026, 14:13
161,402
-69
28 Aug 2026, 12:17
161,471
-48
27 Aug 2026, 14:58
161,519
-72
26 Aug 2026, 15:43
161,591
-83
25 Aug 2026, 14:25
161,674
-97
24 Aug 2026, 11:48
161,771
-103
22 Aug 2026, 21:43
161,874
first reading
Engagement
451 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.90%
avg views ÷ 159,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,820
250 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
250
of 451 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
451 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,956,072
Reactions total
30,078
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,900
Videos
≈3,710
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 28m
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 124 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
59,624 reactions across 440 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,640
24.6%
custom 5195275965470629045
7,941
13.3%
custom 5226738082677551050
5,161
8.66%
custom 5474411237271954217
4,346
7.29%
custom 5215443486920177554
3,941
6.61%
custom 5271975023291174639
3,921
6.58%
🔥
3,870
6.49%
💔
3,535
5.93%
custom 5199619281213483032
2,582
4.33%
custom 5195312442627894088
2,058
3.45%
😁
1,930
3.24%
✍
914
1.53%
custom 5197316049166434441
741
1.24%
custom 5217678398922469966
661
1.11%
custom 5231046497516153988
526
0.882%
custom 5222474520182416431
420
0.704%
custom 5451782579302737798
385
0.646%
custom 5215459584457614241
351
0.589%
custom 5215680070898722896
349
0.585%
custom 5217707398541650679
224
0.376%
11 further kinds
1,128
1.89%
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 451 of the 451 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 451 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.887%
4 of 451 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
8,030
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,360
over 447 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcw3sLf
1
1 September 2026
1 September 2026
2VtzqvMeHx7
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7Fj31XtGwELgh5tyTg2uF56aBXrAU2Qf
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FygGVq3pUFJFaLLakK4cQKmt2JUadrD
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 451 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Фан-факт: японцы устраивают книжные рейвы, на которых тусовщики читают одну и ту же книгу под эмбиент. Ничем другим в течение вечера эти люди не занимаются.
Оригинальный способ вылечить СДВГ.
Продюсер Шрека задумал открыть свою студию ИИ-анимации. Глава DreamWorks Джеффри Катценберг призвал индустрию принять, что нейросети не уйдут из жизни художников, аниматоров и сценаристов, поэтому нужно «пользоваться моментом».
По мнению Катценберга, внедрение ИИ сделает производство быстрее и дешевле, что в свою очередь приведёт к увеличению числа премьер и даже росту рабочих мест. Это диссонирует с его словами, ск…
Стартап Dumb, который продаёт «тупофоны», сделал ход конём и теперь рассматривает письма только от тех соискателей, кто пишет их… от руки.
Ребята производят раскладушки с ограниченным набором функций для борьбы с думскроллингом, и им важно брать на борт сторонников идеологии цифрового минимализма. Сперва они выложили самую обычную вакансию, но были мгновенно завалены однотипными ИИ-откликами. Весь шквал писем пришло…
Россияне путешествуют в 11 раз меньше американцев, посетовал глава Минэкономразвития Максим Решетников. С его слов, на одного жителя приходится около 0,63 поездки в год. Для сравнения: в США этот показатель около семи, в Японии — почти 10.
Чиновник также подчеркнул, что
«переориентация выездного потока на внутренний рынок» — одна из базовых задач прямо сейчас. Иными словами, власти хотят сделать так, чтобы мы чаще о…
Аппетит вошёл в чат, когда заглянул в пекарню на Ozon fresh 🍿
Французский киш, мягкий синна-ролл или румяные пирожки — выбирайте выпечку в приложении, а @ozonfresh привезёт всё с быстрой доставкой.
Тина Канделаки представила убийцу Гарри Поттера. Продюсер заявила, что у новой серии фильмов о «Волшебнике изумрудного города» есть все шансы стать мировым феноменом.
Эта франшиза, наверное, станет примером того, как может развиваться интеллектуально насыщенная вселенная. Аттракционы, которые я увидела в волшебнике, — абсолютно мирового уровня. Я уверена, что ни один из фильмов о Гарри Поттере не предлагал ничего по…
Топ-100 лучших сериалов XXI века назвали критики из The New York Times. В одном месте собрали ленты, которые произвели революцию и захватили внимание сотен миллионов фанатов. Первая двадцатка выглядит так:
1. Во все тяжкие
2. Прослушка
3. Безумцы
4. Наследники
5. Дрянь
6. Игра престолов
7. Вице-президент
8. Студия 30
9. Умерь свой энтузиазм
10. Атланта
11. Офис (США)
12. Замедленное развитие
13. Девчонки
14. Огни но…
Showing the 12 most recent of 451 posts we hold for @boomers_TV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@boomers_TV edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 62 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Афиша Daily @afishadaily · 70,991 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
лидер мнений среди удобрений @lider · 176,821 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
продай мне эту ручку @sell_me · 41,075 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
Диджитал-культура @digital_sila · 38,574 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Попсовый маркетинг @popsmarketing · 111,004 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Передали коллегам @collegi · 137,793 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Share @sharemed · 218,993 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Котлер.Media @atlasonair · 34,422 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 September 2026
Оправдания для заказчика @olegizvini · 32,923 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
А! @aaamagazine · 79,512 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Креатив со звездочкой @creative · 134,107 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
КудаМосква @kudamsk24 · 230,378 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Джейпег Малевича @malepeg · 511,765 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 August 2026
Горящая изба @BurningHut · 26,512 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
Русский ритейл и бизнес @retailrus · 290,716 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Сосисочная @sosicka · 162,767 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Игорь, начинайте работу @oplata_skoro_budet · 460,873 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Зашкваркетинг @dankmarketing · 59,319 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Маркетинговый ход @MarketingPloy · 69,863 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
олдскульный маркетинг @marketingold · 124,179 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Красный маркетинг Гиязова @aaaredmarketing · 276,080 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Боги маркетинга @Godketing · 112,976 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Креатив на сдачу @creoch · 90,017 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 August 2026
Не баг, а фича @bugnotfeature · 1,065,433 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 254 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бумеры смотрят телек” (@boomers_TV), 159,625 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boomers_TV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.