Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психиатрия. Канал доктора Гилёва о психиатрии.

@GilevMD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,047subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073688471
TypeChannel
Username@GilevMD
Created7 October 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GilevMD

Growth

4,0454,0504,047.55 August 2026 — 4,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,047 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,047 subscribers4,0475 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,044–4,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:374,047+2
9 Aug 2026, 20:544,045-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:124,047-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:184,050no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:494,050first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 4,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
973
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total7,787
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5540.4%
5238.2%
👏75.15%
❤‍🔥53.68%
💯53.68%
🔥42.94%
💊21.47%
🙏21.47%
🫡21.47%
👌10.735%
👎10.735%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC659 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вариант для рутуб https://rutube.ru/shorts/4ceab27242c134a84b916726ff49758e/

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC647 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Транскраниальная электростимуляция постоянным током у Вас в кармане. Был я в Батуми и читал статьи, решил записать ролик, так вот и записал, в рубашке купленной на пляже :)) https://youtube.com/shorts/mZUimlR9D2M?feature=share

👍1

28 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC917 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Билатеральная тета-берст стимуляция областей дорсолатеральной префронтальной коры при депрессии позднего возраста: рандомизированное плацебо-контролируемое клиническое исследование Leandro da Costa Lane Valiengo et al., American Journal of Psychiatry, 2026 Цель: Оценить эффективность тета-берст стимуляции (ТБС) в лечении депрессии позднего возраста. Методы: Проведено тройное слепое, плацебо-контролируемое (сравнен

2

26 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,040 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Исследование нейрофункционального потенциала биологически активных веществ шафрана: от поведенческой модуляции, связанной с настроением, до проникновения сафранала в головной мозг Шафран (Crocus sativus L.) давно известен своими свойствами улучшать настроение. Однако точный вклад и нейробиологические механизмы действия его основных биологически активных соединений — кроцинов и сафранала — остаются малоизученными, не

2

24 Jul 2026, 03:40 UTC954 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Эффективность телереабилитационных вмешательств для самоконтроля тиннитуса (шум в ушах): обновление систематического обзора Сара Демон, Элиз Ван Керхове, Аннік Тиммерманс, Венсан Ван Ромпей, Сара Михилс, Аннік Жиль Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27 февраля 2026 ВВЕДЕНИЕ: Тиннитусом страдает приблизительно 14% взрослого населения, при этом существующие методы лечения часто затратны по времени и средствам. Тел

2

20 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC≈1,120 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ЭСТ при агрессии и ажитации у пациентов с деменцией: неожиданно оптимистичные данные Ажитация и агрессия относятся к числу наиболее тягостных и резистентных к терапии поведенческих и психологических симптомов деменции (ПДПС), при этом традиционные фармакологические и поведенческие вмешательства зачастую дают ограниченный эффект и сопряжены с существенными рисками у ослабленных пожилых пациентов. Был проведён систем

👍61

18 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,180 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дефицит лития и развитие болезни Альцгеймера Ранние молекулярные изменения при болезни Альцгеймера (БА) остаются малоизученными. Авторы показали, что эндогенный литий динамически регулируется в головном мозге и вносит вклад в сохранение когнитивных функций при старении. Среди всех изученных металлов только литий значимо снижался в мозге при умеренных когнитивных нарушениях (УКН) — предшественнике БА, а при самой БА

👍81🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Интеграция физической активности в рутинную психиатрическую помощь: обзор Актуальность. Взрослые с тяжёлыми психическими расстройствами сталкиваются со снижением продолжительности жизни на 10–20 лет, преимущественно за счёт повышенной сердечно-сосудистой заболеваемости и нарушений обмена веществ. Низкий уровень физической активности и длительное сидячее поведение — модифицируемые факторы риска, вносящие вклад в этот

💯52🔥2🫡1

10 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,070 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SGLT2-ингибиторы (глифлозины ) ассоциированы с улучшением функции почек у пациентов с расстройствами настроения, получающих литий: реальное историческое когортное исследование Введение. Ингибиторы натрий-глюкозного котранспортера 2-го типа (SGLT2i)¹, изначально разработанные для терапии сахарного диабета 2 типа, показали способность улучшать почечные исходы как у пациентов с диабетом, так и без него. Однако их влиян

5

4 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,580 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему спор «низкоуглеводка против низкожировой диеты» не имеет большого значения (перевод с английского подкаста, ссылка на mp3 ниже) Ведущая Кейт Швейцер обсуждает с журналисткой Самантой Андерер новое исследование о влиянии низкоуглеводных и низкожировых диет, а также общего качества питания на здоровье сердечно-сосудистой системы (опубликовано в Journal of the American College of Cardiology). Суть исследования: У

👍95👌1👎1

3 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,110 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Врач-психиатр объяснил, как зной провоцирует обострение психических заболеваний Коммент для МК https://www.mk.ru/social/2026/07/03/vrachpsikhiatr-obyasnil-kak-znoy-provociruet-obostrenie-psikhicheskikh-zabolevaniy.html

👏7

2 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,610 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Роль психических расстройств в мотивации террористических актов: анализ задокументированных нападений по данным Глобальной базы данных терроризма Введение. Связь между психическими расстройствами и терроризмом остаётся предметом дискуссий в судебной психиатрии и криминологии. Целью настоящего исследования являлось выявление и анализ всех задокументированных террористических актов в Глобальной базе данных терроризма,

7👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GilevMD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 570,246 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психиатрия. Канал доктора Гилёва о психиатрии.” (@GilevMD), 4,047 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GilevMD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.