Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психопанорама

Channel

Психопанорама

@psychopanoramahd

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,987subscribers

-192 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550136623
TypeChannel
Username@psychopanoramahd
DescriptionВсе, что можно найти в «Избранном» психолога
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychopanoramahd

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,98711,18211,084.56 August 2026 — 11,179 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,180 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,182 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,180 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,163 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,163 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,160 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,147 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,148 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,144 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,137 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,134 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,130 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,118 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,117 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,114 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,101 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,092 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,083 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,073 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,074 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,071 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,065 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,058 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,069 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,046 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,063 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,050 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,046 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,055 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,060 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,064 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,066 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,062 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,057 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,056 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,047 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,044 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,047 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,046 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,044 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,043 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,045 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,047 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,041 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,035 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,024 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,021 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,007 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,993 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,991 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,987 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,958–11,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 14:5410,987-4
6 Nov 2026, 11:1910,991-2
5 Nov 2026, 14:4510,993-14
4 Nov 2026, 17:2511,007-14
3 Nov 2026, 15:5111,021-3
1 Nov 2026, 14:2811,024-11
31 Oct 2026, 15:2011,035-6
30 Oct 2026, 18:4111,041-6
29 Oct 2026, 16:3911,047+2
28 Oct 2026, 14:4611,045+2
27 Oct 2026, 12:5111,043-1
26 Oct 2026, 10:3111,044-2
25 Oct 2026, 12:5011,046-1
24 Oct 2026, 12:3811,047+3
23 Oct 2026, 15:5811,044-3
22 Oct 2026, 16:3811,047-9
21 Oct 2026, 14:0911,056-1
20 Oct 2026, 13:0611,057-5
19 Oct 2026, 15:3711,062-4
18 Oct 2026, 15:3111,066first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.97%
avg views ÷ 10,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
986
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held64 (17 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total11,827
Reactions total141
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
597
Videos
37
Links
386

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

721 reactions across 48 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤25034.7%
😁16723.2%
🤣11015.3%
👍618.46%
💯598.18%
🥰496.80%
🤯141.94%
🕊111.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 721 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 06:06 UTC297 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤7👍5💯1😁1

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

5 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC468 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @psychology_poliakinaPhoto

Если у вас есть дети - приглашаем в Клуб неидеальных родителей!  Старт с ноября. В нём и с его помощью Вы сможете: - получить поддержку в сложных ситуациях, связанных с детьми, - обсудить наболевшее без осуждения (а то куда ни глянь, все якобы идеальные и всё успевающие), - легче пережить трудный период отношений с ребёнком, - вместе поразмышлять о воспитании и о своей родительской роли, - обрести уверенность и спо…

❤2

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

4 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTC751 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Пиздец, я только к концу дня поняла, что сегодня официальный выходной. Был

🤣26❤1

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

4 Nov 2026, 18:16 UTC730 views18 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @psf_huwpPhoto

Виды беспокойств и связанные с ними расстройства. Таблицы составлены по материалам книги Р. Лихи "Свобода от тревоги".

❤18

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

4 Nov 2026, 15:43 UTC737 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🥳Психопанорама

😁10

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

2 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC824 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @shema_therapy_ruPhoto

Приглашаю на мини-курс «Основные техники и навыки схема-терапевта» Курс подойдет психологам, психотерапевтам и всем, кто интересуется схема-терапией. Программа: ⭕️психообразование в схема-терапии, узнаете про ⭕️основные интервенции, увидите их ⭕️применение и разбор на практике (в том числе можете побыть в роли клиента) Расписание: Всем привет! Приглашаю на мини-курс «Основные техники и навыки схема-терапевта» Кур…

👍4

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

31 Oct 2026, 16:42 UTC≈1,260 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Новые книги вам принесла😅 🥳Психопанорама

🤣21😁5💯1

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

21 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,550 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Делимся этим лайфхаком, не стесняемся!🔥 🥳Психопанорама

👍9

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

21 Oct 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,250 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @CBTandSchemaTherapyPhoto

Для развития навыка "Отстраненное наблюдение" мы уже почти год разрабатываем бот с использованием искусственного интеллекта. Он помогает развивать три ключевых навыка: "Отстраненное наблюдение", "Снижение контроля за своими мыслями" и "Понимание автоматических реакций". Все эти навыки необходимы для эффективного наблюдения за своими мыслительными процессами. Бот построен на принципе сократического диалога в рамках ме…

❤2🕊2

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

21 Oct 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 8 November 2026

Коллеги, срочно нужен отзыв на бота👇👇👇 Затестите плиз) хочу включать такой способ отслеживания мыслей в своих тренингах

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

20 Oct 2026, 21:57 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 8 November 2026

Коллеги! На канале «Схема-терапия. Практика выложила две демо-сессии, рекомендую смотреть по порядку, так как у нас получилась двухсерийка))) В первом видео с помощью интервью с режимом мы выявили травмирующее событие, которое привело к сложностям в настоящем, а во втором уже отрескриптили его в групповом формате. Приятного просмотра! И если хотите также, приглашаем вас с Аленой на групповую схема-терапию, старт у…

Signed Dinara Bobrovskaya

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @psychopanoramahd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@psychopanoramahd edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @psychopanoramahd as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 16:30 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

Небольшая перекличка: кто вы?

  1. Специалист65%
  2. Клиент10%
  3. И то и другое)24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Библиотека психология/ философия/ медицина
@biblio_psychology · 19,823
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Библиотека психолога
@psy_b00k · 21,898
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Начинающие психологи
@new_psycholog · 19,371
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Сообщество психологов
@interviziya · 19,240
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог
@psy_professional · 25,382
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Психология | Psychologies
@PsychologiesRussia · 53,116
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 40,380
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Чистые Когниции
@pure_cognitions · 38,849
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Неврология и Психиатрия
@neurology_and_psychiatry · 19,570
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
Университет практической психологии Н.И. Козлова
@univer_pp · 21,048
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀
@krasikovAlexey · 42,499
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Психиатрия & Нейронауки
@psy_and_neuro · 22,537
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Smart | Медиа про психологию
@smart_inc_psy · 23,246
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,293
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,142
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Василиса Бутусова
@stillvasilisa · 24,563
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
Психиатр Онлайн
@psychiatristonline · 20,777
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
🔵Психологія з МПА🔵
@psy_mpa_ua · 22,792
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,070
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Где моё внимание?
@pure_cognitions_adhd · 28,395
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠
@dubininvaofficial · 44,733
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов
@spb_idpo · 27,525
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психопанорама” (@psychopanoramahd), 10,987 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychopanoramahd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.