Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

пост_кбт

@goodenoughtherapist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,042subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840305061
TypeChannel
Username@goodenoughtherapist
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/goodenoughtherapist

Growth

1,0381,0421,0406 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,037–1,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:341,042+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:001,041+3
6 Aug 2026, 13:021,038no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:001,038first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 1,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
361
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held11 (18 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,445
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7650.7%
💯2516.7%
🔥1812.0%
😁106.67%
❤‍🔥74.67%
👏64.00%
🕊53.33%
👍21.33%
🥰10.667%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC198 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

как работать с парами или запросами на отношения В августе Институт Схематерапии Пар завершает набор на полную обучающую программу⁠. Она подойдёт терапевтам, которые хотят работать с парами или точнее учитывать отношения в индивидуальной практике. В файле показан пример концептуализации случая Лары и Вовы, которые мы разбирали выше. Институт проводит единственные в России программы по парной схематерапии с междуна

11🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC217 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

запросы на отношения: оптика схематерапии Лара пришла к психологу с запросом на тревогу, но уже двадцать минут рассказывает, как Вова опять уткнулся в телефон, не ответил и вообще ведёт себя как человек, которому отношения не очень нужны. Можно разобрать ситуацию привычным для КПТ-терапевта способом: определить триггер, автоматические мысли, эмоции, телесные реакции и поведение Лары. Например, Вова достаёт телефон,

10❤‍🔥7🔥3💯1

22 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC499 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я хотела работать с тревогой, а мне несут отношения 😒 так у меня и получилось. кбт-терапевты, насколько я нас знаю, не любят тему отношенек. а она, падла, всё равно всплвает всё время. обсудили с Эммой Агасарян почему так и — отчасти — как с этим можно работать. видео на ютуб [ссылка] аудио подкаст [ссылка]

20🕊5🔥3💯2

20 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC531 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ещё только одно

💯22😁7👍2🔥1

9 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC748 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

соцсети психолога: что изменилось за 8 лет? до фига всего изменилось, скажу я вам. рассказала сегодня про свой личный опыт для участников Летней школы Поведенческой кампании. Выкладываю некоторые слайды из презентации. я лично планирую и дальше писать тексты, написать еще одну книгу и наблюдать за изменениями 👀 какой у вас план по соцсетям?

16👏6😁3🥰1

27 Jun 2026, 11:49 UTC608 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @post_trevogaPhoto

_тревога в отношениях иду в гости на эфир к Эмме Агасарян: "Тревога в близких отношениях: что стоит за ней на самом деле", который состоится 29 июня в 19:00 (мск) пишите ваши вопросы к эфиру в анонимную форму: https://forms.gle/djx29bjZHtMFeFQQ7 Почему именно в близких отношениях тревога может становиться особенно интенсивной? Как наш опыт привязанности влияет на чувство безопасности рядом с другими людьми? И всег

🔥81

27 Jun 2026, 11:49 UTC431 viewsread 6 August 2026

коллеги, вы тоже приходите. Эмма — суперпупер профессионал и президент нашей ассоциации. поговорим о современных теориях привязанности и безопасности.

19 Jun 2026, 17:41 UTC608 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Так же напоминаю что в понедельник докпсифест стартует и в понедельник в 18:00 моя лекция про хейт Зарегистрироваться: https://psy.docpsyclub.ru/docpsyfest2026?gcao=55020&gcpc=85b89

2

19 Jun 2026, 17:41 UTC613 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @acbtruPhoto

Уважаемые коллеги! На бесплатном фестивале доказательной психологии и психиатрии ДокПсиФест’26, выступят наши коллеги — члены АКБТ: Эмма Агасарян, Яков Кочетков, Татьяна Павлова, Амина Назаралиева, Полина Тур, Марина Гармаш, Наталья Степанова, Мария Соколова, Екатерина Онокой и др. 10 дней, 50+ тем, больше 60 спикеров Формат участия: онлайн, бесплатно Даты фестиваля: с 22 июня по 1 июля Главная идея, которая вло

8

18 Jun 2026, 04:03 UTC414 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

рекомендую, я смотрела доклад Даниила на конфе по этой теме — очень хороший

3

18 Jun 2026, 04:03 UTC525 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @acbtruPhoto

Модель SMART давно стала почти «золотым стандартом» формулирования целей в когнитивно-поведенческой терапии. Ее преподают на обучениях, используют в практике и рекомендуют в учебниках. Однако при ближайшем рассмотрении возникает любопытный вопрос: насколько прочны научные основания этой модели и действительно ли она является оптимальным инструментом для терапевтического целеполагания? На встрече мы изучим происхожд

5

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @goodenoughtherapist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 15,237 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“пост_кбт” (@goodenoughtherapist), 1,042 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goodenoughtherapist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.