Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Headache_dr

Channel

Headache_dr

@headache_dr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,160subscribers

+289 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001566974629
TypeChannel
Username@headache_dr
DescriptionНина Владимировна Латышева, д.м.н. https://school-headachedr.ru/ Невролог, специалист по головной и лицевой боли, Сеченовский Университет и Клиника головной боли Вейна. Регистрация в Роскомнадзоре #4892498183
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/headache_dr

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,86216,16016,0116 August 2026 — 15,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,872 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,874 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,873 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,872 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,874 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,862 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,868 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,867 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,866 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,869 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,867 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,870 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,868 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,880 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,886 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,881 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,880 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,881 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,885 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,886 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,890 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,902 subscribers9 September 2026 — 15,909 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,912 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,913 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,925 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,933 subscribers30 September 2026 — 16,003 subscribers5 October 2026 — 16,018 subscribers10 October 2026 — 16,028 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,032 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,037 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,041 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,037 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,041 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,048 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,049 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,050 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,054 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,057 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,060 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,066 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,072 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,074 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,081 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,095 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,108 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,118 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,122 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,125 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,139 subscribers7 November 2026 — 16,143 subscribers10 November 2026 — 16,151 subscribers12 November 2026 — 16,160 subscribers6 August 202612 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 98 days, net +289. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,817–16,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 01:2016,160+9
10 Nov 2026, 06:3616,151+8
7 Nov 2026, 12:0016,143+4
6 Nov 2026, 09:0616,139+14
5 Nov 2026, 07:4016,125+3
4 Nov 2026, 09:0916,122+4
3 Nov 2026, 08:4116,118+10
2 Nov 2026, 06:1116,108+13
1 Nov 2026, 03:2016,095+14
31 Oct 2026, 02:5916,081+7
29 Oct 2026, 01:0016,074+2
28 Oct 2026, 00:0916,072+6
27 Oct 2026, 01:4716,066+6
26 Oct 2026, 01:0716,060+3
25 Oct 2026, 01:4716,057+3
24 Oct 2026, 02:1016,054+4
23 Oct 2026, 03:5716,050+1
22 Oct 2026, 06:5616,049+1
21 Oct 2026, 03:5016,048+7
20 Oct 2026, 02:5616,041first reading

Engagement

100 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 16,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,970
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 100 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held100 (28 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total106,790
Reactions total3,400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 06:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,050
Videos
≈130
Links
≈555

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,616 reactions across 97 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,49132.7%
🔥1,96925.9%
😁6498.52%
❤‍🔥6418.42%
👍6368.35%
🤣3664.81%
💯2092.74%
⚡1421.86%
🙏1421.86%
👏961.26%
🤩831.09%
🥰530.696%
😍410.538%
😱330.433%
🎉220.289%
🏆110.144%
🤯110.144%
👌100.131%
👎40.053%
🤨30.039%
3 further kinds40.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 20 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (55.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,070 views26 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥18❤4❤‍🔥3👌1

12 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,260 views38 reactionsread 13 November 2026

При лечении депрессии важно различать три понятия: ответ на терапию, ремиссию и восстановление. Это не синонимы, а разные клинические результаты. 1️⃣ Ответ на лечение (Response) Это уменьшение выраженности депрессивных симптомов на ≥50% от исходного уровня. Например, у пациента было 20 баллов по PHQ-9, а стало 10. Это ответ на терапию. Но пациент всё ещё может испытывать ангедонию, утомляемость, нарушения сна и конц…

❤20🔥14❤‍🔥3🙏1

12 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC≈1,680 views102 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Мы все время говорим: "Вам нужна когнитивно-поведенческая терапия (КПТ)". Для тревоги, снижения настроения, хронической боли, головокружения, а теперь еще и для тиннитуса. А что там происходит на этих сеансах КПТ, всегда остается за скобками. Поэтому мы с вами имеем очень размытое представление о том, что такое КПТ. И вот Американская академия оториноларингологии в своих новых рекомендациях показала, что конкретно н…

🔥44❤37👍7🙏6❤‍🔥4👏2😁2

11 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,720 views63 reactionsread 13 November 2026

А хотите провести вечер приятно? Вот мое предложение. Вышла вторая серия второго сезона подкастов "Встречи в подсолнухах"🌻 https://harmoniamentis.ru/meet_in_sunflowers/#2sz Она достаточно лиричная, а местами смешная. Уверена, что она вам понравится и даст уверенность в том, что мы с вами все делаем правильно. Приятного просмотра!

🔥33❤‍🔥20😍7❤3

11 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,310 views111 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🔔 Тиннитус: что изменилось в рекомендациях 2026 года? Американская академия оториноларингологии (AAO-HNSF) опубликовала обновлённые клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению тиннитуса — впервые с 2014 года. Главный акцент: лечить нужно не столько сам звук, сколько его влияние на жизнь пациента. Потому что лечить сам звук мы умеем очень плохо. Рекомендации касаются взрослых с хроническим (≥6 месяцев) тинниту…

❤65🔥23❤‍🔥15💯5👍3

11 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,860 views62 reactionsread 13 November 2026
File

В чем прелесть ведения канала без всяких правил и контент плана? Правильно! Обещала разбор новейших рекомендаций по шуму в ушах 3 недели назад - и делаю сегодня😁 Это краткое изложение основных положений этого огромного документа. Но он настолько прекрасно написан, что, если Вы прицельно занимаетесь тиннитусом, я бы настоятельно рекомендовала вам прочитать статью целиком. Там всего 62 страницы)

❤35❤‍🔥12😁10🔥5

10 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,200 views74 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🧠 Вышла интересная статья о новой ежедневной персистирующей головной боли (НЕПГБ). НЕПГБ — редкая, но зачастую крайне инвалидизирующая форма первичной головной боли, характеризующаяся внезапным началом и быстрым переходом в постоянную боль. Главная диагностическая особенность: пациент может точно назвать день, когда началась головная боль, а в течение 24 часов она становится непрерывной. Боль сохраняется более 3 мес…

❤47👍13🤯11👌1🔥1🙏1

10 Nov 2026, 05:35 UTC≈2,140 views59 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Немного легкой литературы с утра😊 Вышла статья «How do we sleep while our beds are burning? High ambient temperatures are associated with substantial sleep loss» («Как мы спим, когда наши кровати горят? Высокая температура воздуха связана с существенной потерей сна»), которая написана группой ученых из Австралии и опубликована в научном журнале SLEEP. Строчка «How do we sleep while our beds are burning?» (Как мы мо…

🔥31❤12😁10👍6

9 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,370 views152 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

🎉🎉🎉 Это вам мой большой-большой намёк! SAVE THE DATE 13 марта 2027 года Большой зал ЦКИ МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана. Кто знает, тот знает😊 Новичков очень ждём тоже. Подробности в ближайшие дни!

❤79🔥51❤‍🔥11🎉7🤣3⚡1

9 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC≈2,300 views70 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Биполярное расстройство встречается редко. Но неврологи боятся что-то пропустить. Вот особенности депрессии, которые должны нас насторожить. Это не критерии диагноза биполярного расстройства, но очень красные флаги, особенно если этих признаков несколько. Здесь нужно будет посоветоваться с психиатром.

🔥41👍14❤‍🔥7❤5🙏3

8 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,540 views139 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @brainexplainedVideo

Градус накаляется 👀 Вы уже знаете мое сравнение антидепрессантов с инструкцией для нервной системы (для новеньких - вот этот пост). Для нивелирования длительной сексуальной дисфункции на СИОЗС/Н мы можем добавить второй препарат, действующий избирательно на нужную цель - то есть даем мозгу ещё более подробную инструкцию (впускать, что положено; не пропускать, что не положено). Но иногда инструкции нужны не нервной…

🔥86❤27😁17🤩4😍4🥱1

8 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC≈2,360 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Мы много-много раз говорили о том, что делать при сексуальной дисфункции на фоне антидепрессантов. И про Триттико, и про Спитомин и про разные другие лайфхаки и рецепторы, стоящие за этим. Но гениальная Тамара Филимонова даёт ответ, который может быть даже лучше. Она жжёт, как всегда. Все её ролики очень в точку, скоро будет еще один (spoiler alert😁).

❤12🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @headache_dr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@headache_dr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTCAnonymous Poll564 voters

Я хочу начать вести свой блог, но боюсь, что…

  1. Коллеги перестанут воспринимать меня всерьёз8%
  2. Я начну упрощать медицину ради просмотров14%
  3. Мне нечего сказать, кроме пересказа чужих мыслей45%
  4. Однажды я скажу что-то слишком категорично и потом пожалею об этом23%
  5. Любая ошибка станет публичной, и надо мной будут смеяться35%
  6. Я стану “блогером”, а не врачом14%
  7. После первых видео станет стыдно21%
  8. Окажется, что мне очень важно чужое одобрени31%
  9. Не останется времени на жизнь32%
  10. Не вытяну по объективным причинам, брошу и впаду из-за этого в депрессию37%

The shares total 260%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz287 voters

Какой механизм лучше всего объясняет, как антипсихотик может не повышать пролактин?

  1. Частичный агонизм к D₂-рецепторам сохраняет дофаминергическое торможение секреции пролактина41%
  2. Антагонизм к 5-HT₂A-рецепторам у атипичных АП полностью блокирует синтез пролактина лактотрофами20%
  3. Блокада D₂-рецепторов в мезолимбическом пути компенсирует их блокаду в тубероинфундибулярном пути22%
  4. Положительная обратная связь в гипофизе: блокада дофамина снижает выработку пролактина18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz501 voters

Какой антипсихотик может не повышать уровень пролактина и даже снизить его?

  1. Сульпирид7%
  2. Рисперидон3%
  3. Галоперидол3%
  4. Оланзапин9%
  5. Кветиапин15%
  6. Арипипразол49%
  7. Хлорпротиксен5%
  8. Алимемазин9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Галеева
@doctor_galeeva · 28,842
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Доктор В.К. Зафираки
@drzafiraki · 19,270
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
Психотерапевт Прибытков
@pribytkov_psy · 40,400
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 August 2026
Dr.Anshina
@DrAnshina · 392,232
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
Пей таблетки! | MedIQLab
@mediq · 65,586
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
MD.school | Медицинский онлайн-университет | Доказательная медицина
@medicina_discendi · 21,248
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 September 2026
SYNAPSE I СИНАПС
@synapse_channel_1 · 40,185
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,085
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Невролог Стецкая Татьяна | ️doctor_steckaya 💊🩺
@doctor_steckaya · 32,606
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Blog Kardiologa 🩺
@blog_kardiologa · 138,292
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Доктор Епифанов | Невролог| Все о позвоночнике
@epifanovnews · 49,291
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
Неврология и Психиатрия
@neurology_and_psychiatry · 19,550
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
dnevnikdoctora
@dnevnikdoctora · 45,187
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Юрист для врача Ангелина Романовская
@mfcexpert_news · 29,908
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Каплина О.Ю., гинеколог, гемостазиолог & dr.gemogyn
@dr_gemogyn · 21,864
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 23 September 2026
Аккредитация врачей | Ординатура
@credit_med · 23,151
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Headache_dr” (@headache_dr), 16,160 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/headache_dr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.