Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Академия Современной Психологии

@modernpsyacademy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,483subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309952831
TypeChannel
Username@modernpsyacademy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/modernpsyacademy

Growth

7,4837,4947,488.56 August 2026 — 7,494 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,493 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,483 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,481–7,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:287,483-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:517,485-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:417,493-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:487,494first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.95%
avg views ÷ 7,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
445
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total6,678
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6429.0%
😁4118.6%
🔥3415.4%
❤‍🔥2410.9%
🥰198.60%
🤣114.98%
👍104.52%
😭62.71%
😍41.81%
👏20.905%
10.452%
🆒10.452%
🗿10.452%
😱10.452%
🤓10.452%
🤷‍♀10.452%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC167 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Настало время показать тех, кто выступит перед вами на антикризисной конфе (бесплатной, онлайн. регистрируйтесь: clck.ru/3VCmiq) На конференции всего будет два потока выступлений — Трек А и Трек В. 📈 Начнём знакомство с Трека А: «Стратегия и рост» Этот поток для тех, кто хочет развивать практику не только через увеличение количества консультаций, а через более устойчивую систему: новые форматы работы, AI-инструмен

6🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC479 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это Иона. Как вы видите, она счастлива быть клиническим психологом. Все потому, что благодаря образованию клинического психолога она сможет провести открытое занятие «Клиническое мышление: тренд или необходимость?» Поддержите Иону. Приходите на занятие, чтобы она стала еще счастливее

29😁11👍8🤣5😱1

10 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC485 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Хотите стать клиническим психологом? Понятно. Чтоб уметь работать со сложными случаями? Понятно. Чтоб ещё и навыки свои усилить? Понятно. Ну тогда смотрите, прикольный вариант — бесплатный открытый урок от клинического психолога, КПТ-терапевта и главного методиста курса по клинической психологии — Ионы Гусаченко. За 60 минут разберёмся, что такое клиническое мышление, кому оно действительно нужно, а кому — нет, и ч

3😁3🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC508 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Такие изменения в жизни всегда сопровождаются страхом, сомнениями: А что, если не получится? Если не мое? Если все зря? Хорошо, что есть люди, которые своим примером показывают, что все не зря — что мечты должны сбываться, а к цели всегда стоит идти. Мы собрали истории наших студентов курса «Профессия: психолог-консультант» В них — о том, что помогло им принять решение. И почему они решили прийти в психологию Если

🔥5🥰3😍2

8 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC446 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Говорим о проблемах прямо — и решаем. Потому что психологи тоже имеют право на стабильный заработок, на понимание, сколько клиентов и когда у них будет, на спокойствие и планирования без страха. Без постоянного ощущения: «Сейчас все пойдет по одному месту» Мы сделали полностью открытую конференцию — чтобы прийти мог каждый. И психолог с сотнями клиентов, и психолог с тремя клиентами. Сделали онлайн — чтобы посмот

❤‍🔥5🥰31

7 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC464 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как Бутырка в своих песнях раскрывает суть депрессии и работу КПТ? Мы провели небольшой анализ. Мы сделали выводы. Мы рассказали о них в новом посте. Ваш ход. Приходите на КПТ. У нас есть два больших курса по КПТ: КПТ. Оксфордская модель: clck.ru/3V9BnU КПТ. Модель Бека: clck.ru/3V9Bky И целый курс по КПТ в работе с депрессией: clck.ru/3V9Bon Вороваек тоже разберем. Ставьте 🔥, если хотите разбор

😁7🔥6😭6👏2🗿1

7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Признавайтесь, ну так все и было… Если только планируете стать психологом, не пропустите наше открытое занятие «А что, если стать психологом?» Подробности и регистрация здесь: https://clck.ru/3V97N2

4🥰3

6 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC388 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Психосоматика — это прикольно. Про нее интересно спорить, смотреть видео и думать, кто прав, кто виноват. Это действительно интересная, оооочень глубокая тема. И она перестает быть такой, когда приходит клиент с жалобами на боли в животе. Гастроэнтеролог все посмотрел. Гастроскопию сделали. Даже прошел несколько вариантов терапии — все равно живот болит. Все сошлись на мнении, что иного пути нет — надо к психологу

5👍2

5 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC449 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Центр «Справиться Проще» — партнер Антикризисной Конфы Центр, как многие знают, начинал с подкастов — а сейчас это целая система помощи людям. Рассказываем, что есть в «Справиться Проще» сегодня: ▪️Онлайн-центр поведенческой терапии ▪️Медицинская клиника психиатрии и неврологии в Москве ▪️Медиа о психологии ▪️Программа на Ютубе и подкаст ▪️Короткие видео о навыках, которые помогают наладить ежедневную рутину, сп

🔥10

4 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC509 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Политика в психотерапии 💘Грубое этическое нарушение или возможность видеть больше контекста? 💘Навязывание своих ценностей клиенту или глубокое исследование его опыта? Наш новый пост носит несколько дискуссионный характер, но в нем мы постарались объяснить, вредит ли фемоптика ходу терапии и является ли она грубым нарушением со стороны психолога. А если вы, как и мы, тоже пригляделись и поняли, что очень хочется бо

❤‍🔥8🔥32🤷‍♀1

3 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC538 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Привет, спишь? У нас урок по EMDR послезавтра… придешь? Там будет твой бывший Приходи: https://clck.ru/3V5qcQ

😁20❤‍🔥9🤣6🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @modernpsyacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 20,844 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия Современной Психологии” (@modernpsyacademy), 7,483 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/modernpsyacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.