Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,521–32,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 06:18
32,541
-5
16 Sept 2026, 03:58
32,546
+5
14 Sept 2026, 14:01
32,541
-7
12 Sept 2026, 23:58
32,548
-10
10 Sept 2026, 21:21
32,558
-10
7 Sept 2026, 18:00
32,568
-9
4 Sept 2026, 16:41
32,577
-20
1 Sept 2026, 21:47
32,597
-6
31 Aug 2026, 23:18
32,603
-11
30 Aug 2026, 20:56
32,614
-3
29 Aug 2026, 23:37
32,617
+3
29 Aug 2026, 02:48
32,614
-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:53
32,620
-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:34
32,621
-4
26 Aug 2026, 05:03
32,625
-12
25 Aug 2026, 03:16
32,637
-8
23 Aug 2026, 22:54
32,645
-10
22 Aug 2026, 06:35
32,655
-20
20 Aug 2026, 20:22
32,675
-2
19 Aug 2026, 19:52
32,677
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.33%
avg views ÷ 32,541 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
65 (28 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
103,060
Reactions total
1,979
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈229
Links
≈564
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,019 reactions across 59 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,403
46.5%
😁
585
19.4%
🔥
501
16.6%
👍
397
13.2%
🥰
54
1.79%
👏
37
1.23%
🙏
27
0.894%
👌
15
0.497%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,019 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В какой-то момент мой мир сжался до нескольких знакомых маршрутов.
Я знал, где находится ближайшая аптека, где можно присесть, где есть люди. Возил с собой воду, таблетки, заряженный телефон. Старался не уезжать далеко от дома, потому что чем дальше уезжал, тем страшнее становилось. К 2012 году дошло до того, что я практически не мог выйти из дома один.
При этом со стороны я выглядел вполне обычным человеком: работ…
Вчера мы открыли набор на программу «Свобода от тревоги, паники и страхов»
И я поймал себя на мысли: если бы в тот период, когда у меня самого были панические атаки и сильная тревога, мне дали все эти материалы и сказали: «Вот, Павел. Здесь тебе объяснят, что с тобой происходит и что с этим делать», – я бы, наверное, отдал за это очень многое.
Потому что тогда мне не хватало очередного совета «успокойся» или способ…
Какой вопрос разбираем следующим?
🔥 – Как не сбежать из магазина, если прямо посреди покупок начинается паника?
👍 – Почему мне становится тревожно, когда я остаюсь дома один, хотя объективно ничего не происходит?
❤️ – В пробке накрывает так, что руки трясутся, страшно. Как справляться, когда за рулём?
Только мне становится хорошо, я сразу думаю: «А вдруг тревога сейчас вернётся?» Почему я боюсь даже хорошего состояния❓
Потому что за месяцы или годы тревоги вы могли привыкнуть не только тревожиться, но и ждать тревогу.
Представьте: несколько недель вам было плохо. Вы постоянно следили за своим состоянием, боялись очередной панической атаки, прислушивались к телу. А потом неожиданно наступает хороший день.
И вмес…
Эту информацию я хотел бы показать самому себе много лет назад
Я хорошо помню себя в начале десятых, когда сам столкнулся с паническими атаками и тревогой. Тогда об этом почти никто публично не говорил. Я не понимал, что со мной происходит, и в какой-то момент даже считал своё состояние чем-то постыдным. И, конечно, больше всего мне хотелось одного – чтобы всё это просто закончилось. Чтобы не было тревоги, симптомов…
Дам вам одну практику. Особенно рекомендую её тем, кто может часами прокручивать в голове здоровье, работу, деньги, детей и различные варианты того, что может произойти.
Выделите сегодня 30 минут для беспокойства. Например, с 19:00 до 19:30.
До этого времени живите обычной жизнью. Если в 12:40 появляется мысль: «А что, если эта слабость всё-таки из-за болезни?», не нужно её прогонять, успокаивать себя или пытаться …
Почему тревога меняет темы, а проблема остаётся?
Сегодня вы боитесь панической атаки в метро и стараетесь не ездить далеко от дома. Через какое-то время становится легче, но появляется новая тема – здоровье. Потом тревога переключается на детей: «А вдруг с ними что-то случится?» На работу: «А если я допущу ошибку?» На отношения или навязчивые мысли, от которых хочется избавиться любой ценой.
Темы совершенно разные.…
❤19👍6🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @szmclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@szmclub edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Алексей Красиков®️️️🍀 @krasikovAlexey · 41,248 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Кардиолог Чайковская @cardiolog_chaykovskaya · 58,129 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Федоренко Павел | Тревога FM” (@szmclub), 32,541 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szmclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.