Про питание, привычки, поведение и вес
❌ Без запугиваний и запретов,
💚 С принятием и поддержкой,
✅ С поправкой на реальную жизнь.
Хотите быть в гармонии с едой и телом? Стремитесь к изменениям, есть цель?
💬 @DariaSnape 🌐 http://dariasnape.tilda.ws
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 279–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:33
280
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:52
280
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
400.0%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
14 (6 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,360
Reactions total
85
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
192
Videos
13
Links
57
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
424 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
139
32.8%
❤
128
30.2%
❤🔥
26
6.13%
⚡
16
3.77%
✍
13
3.07%
🎉
13
3.07%
👍
13
3.07%
🙏
12
2.83%
💯
10
2.36%
custom 5438496463044752972
9
2.12%
🤗
8
1.89%
🍾
7
1.65%
👌
6
1.42%
custom 5422439311196834318
5
1.18%
🤩
5
1.18%
🥰
5
1.18%
custom 5098535344706421945
4
0.943%
🆒
3
0.708%
👏
1
0.236%
😍
1
0.236%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ХОТИТЕ ПОХУДЕТЬ, НО НЕ ПОЛУЧАЕТСЯ? ЗАДАЙТЕ СЕБЕ ЭТИ 4 ВОПРОСА
Вместо того чтобы искать очередную диету или винить себя за отсутствие силы воли, попробуйте сделать одно простое упражнение.
• Возьмите лист бумаги и разделите его на 4 квадранта.
• Затем поочередно задайте себе 4 вопрос и запишите ответы.
1️⃣ Каковы плюсы моего текущего поведения и питания?
- Что хорошего мне дает мое текущее поведение?
- Что хороше…
МНЕ СЕГОДНЯ 3️⃣9️⃣.
МОЙ ЛИЧНЫЙ НОВЫЙ ГОД
Начинаю его с благодарности. За здоровье, время и возможность заниматься делом, которое мне действительно интересно. За поддержку родных, близких, друзей и коллег. За возможность учиться, расти и быть полезной другим.
Как и многие, я жонглирую разными ролями. Сейчас для меня особенно важна работа: построение новой карьеры, освоение новой профессии, развитие как специалиста. …
ДОМАШНЕЕ VS МАГАЗИННОЕ
С точки зрения пищевой безопасности
Недавно с Марией Кардаковой @Marys_stories обсуждали распространённый стереотип о том, что все домашние продукты и еда полезные и безопасные, а магазинные (то есть промышленного производства) - это "химия", как минимум бесполезная, как максимум вредная.
Но всё не так прямолинейно.
• С одной стороны, когда вы готовите дома, вы сами выбираете ингредиенты, их…
ДЕПРЕССИЯ, АНТИДЕПРЕССАНТЫ И ВЕС (Часть 3)
В заключительной части хочу поговорить о возможных реакциях со стороны ЖКТ, дефицитах, которые часто выявляются у людей с депрессией, а также об употреблении алкоголя во время лечения.
▪️ВОЗМОЖНЫЕ ПОБОЧНЫЕ ЭФФЕКТЫ СО СТОРОНЫ ЖКТ
🔹 Тошнота
Чаще встречается при приеме СИОЗС и СИОЗСН. Это связано с усилением действия серотонина и активацией его рецепторов в ЖКТ, особенно в …
ДЕПРЕССИЯ, АНТИДЕПРЕССАНТЫ И ВЕС (Часть 2)
Давайте обсудим, почему после начала лечения депрессии вес может увеличиваться.
▪️Это не всегда “побочный эффект” антидепрессантов. Во многих случаях это закономерное следствие улучшения состояния и изменений в поведении человека.
Например:
• Депрессия → снижение аппетита → уменьшение потребления пищи → потеря массы тела.
После начала лечения:
• Улучшение состояния → в…
ДЕПРЕССИЯ, АНТИДЕПРЕССАНТЫ И ВЕС (Часть 1)
‼️ Депрессия - это заболевание, а не слабость характера или отсутствие силы воли. Постановкой диагноза и лечением занимаются врачи.
▪️ДЛЯ ДЕПРЕССИИ ХАРАКТЕРНЫ:
• сниженное настроение большую часть дня;
• потеря интереса и удовольствия от привычных занятий;
• выраженная усталость и снижение уровня энергии;
• нарушения сна (бессонница или повышенная сонливость);
• изменения…
Мой дебют на YouTube! 😊 Вышло видео с моим участием. Очень волновалась, но этот опыт оказался невероятно интересным и ценным. Буду рада, если посмотрите и поделитесь своими впечатлениями!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4GJNe72X8
ПОЧЕМУ ВСЁ РАВНО НЕ ПОЛУЧАЕТСЯ?
Почему бывает так, что и мотивация есть, и намерения серьёзные, и усилия прикладываются, но изменения всё равно не приживаются, и мы быстро бросаем начатое?
▪️ПРИЧИНАМИ МОГУТ БЫТЬ:
• слишком высокая сложность задачи - новые действия требуют слишком много усилий или изменений слишком много одновременно;
• отсутствие необходимых навыков - например, навыки готовить, планировать меню, …
ЧТО ПОМОГАЕТ ЛЮДЯМ МЕНЯТЬСЯ?
Как вы обычно объясняете своё поведение, когда у вас что-то получается или, наоборот, не получается делать?
Обычно люди объясняют своё поведение мотивацией, дисциплиной, силой воли, уровнем самоконтроля или внешними обстоятельствами.
Я предлагаю рассмотреть несколько факторов, которые могут влиять на наше поведение.
▪️МОТИВАЦИЯ
Запускает, направляет и поддерживает поведение.
Это прич…
The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ТЕПЕРЬ Я — ЧЛЕН КОМАНДЫ АДНС
Спешу поделиться с вами радостной новостью 💚
Я стала частью команды АДНС и буду работать с коллегами на годовой программе «Нутрициология: наука и практика».
Особенно ценно для меня то, что еще в 2024 году я сама пришла на эту программу как участник, с интересом, волнением и большими ожиданиями. А сегодня я получаю возможность помогать другим специалистам расти, достигать своих целей, в…
🔥38⚡11👍8🤩5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @esh_spokojno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,169,863 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ешь спокойно с Дарьей Снэйп” (@esh_spokojno), 280 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/esh_spokojno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.