Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РеФорма | Психология, питание и работа с весом

Channel

РеФорма | Психология, питание и работа с весом

@reforma_life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,974subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586844945
TypeChannel
Username@reforma_life
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/reforma_life

Growth

3,9673,9773,9727 August 2026 — 3,967 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,969 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,971 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,972 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,977 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,974 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,977 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,974 subscribers3,9747 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,966–3,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 02:013,974-3
24 Aug 2026, 02:463,977+3
20 Aug 2026, 19:023,974-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:193,977+5
14 Aug 2026, 00:563,972+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:313,971+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:523,969+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:033,967first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.74%
avg views ÷ 3,974 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total684
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 58s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3258.2%
👍1120.0%
🔥814.5%
🙏35.45%
💯11.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Сколько не говорю, ест что попало!» Мы все на своем опыте поняли, насколько улучшает качество жизни правильное питание. И хочется передать эти уже сформированные привычки своим детям. Но чем больше мы пытаемся, тем больше встречаемся с игнором, сопротивлением и «Маам, перестань, я хочу чипсов!» Что делать? Посмотреть вебинар Анны Мелехиной на эту тему. Бесплатный доступ сохранится еще на 2 дня. В эфире врач и ос

🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC282 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📢 Внимание! Продление акции на 24 часа! Диабет, ЖКТ, дети, спортсмены, беременность — важно учитывать особенности каждого клиента. Даже самые грамотные рекомендации не всегда дают результат, потому что один и тот же подход не работает для всех. 🌟 Программа повышения квалификации «Диетологическое консультирование при ожирении, РПП и физиологических состояниях. Основы нутрициологии» поможет вам освоить индивидуальный

🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC400 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌟 Дорогие коллеги! 🌟 Институт здоровья РеФорма в МИП рад анонсировать уникальную программу «Диетологическое консультирование при ожирении, РПП и физиологических состояниях» в записи со скидкой более 70 % 🎉 👩‍⚕️ Эксперт блока — Анна Мелехина, врач-диетолог, терапевт и основатель Центра диетологии Анны Мелехиной. ✨ В результате обучения вы: ✔️ Комплексно обновите знания в современной научно обоснованной диетологии;

4

23 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC504 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня не получилось. Я ухожу… Спустя несколько недель работы такая мысль появляется у большинства клиентов, которые приходят решить проблемы с пищевым поведением. Причем неважно, к кому они пришли — к психологу, тренеру или к консультанту по питанию. Что делать специалисту в такой ситуации? Понимать особенности психики клиента и грамотно «настраивать» его мотивацию на каждом этапе работы. А еще отслеживать скрыты

1

17 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC553 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💉 Вебинар от специалистов Центра «МОЖНО Есть» «Сопровождение клиента в эпоху Оземпика: особенности нутрициологического и психологического ведения» Ещё недавно казалось, что препараты аГПП-1 изменят правила игры. Люди худеют, аппетит снижается, вес уходит… Возникает закономерный вопрос: а зачем тогда диетолог, нутрициолог или психолог? На вебинаре разберёмся, почему на практике всё оказывается гораздо интереснее. Об

4👍2

11 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC510 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🟢 Практический курс Александра Колмановского «Когда еда становится проблемой: помощь и поддержка ребенка в эпоху РПП». Набор открыт. Этот курс создан для родителей и специалистов, которые хотят разобраться, как и когда начинаются сложности с пищевым поведением и что действительно помогает ребенку и семье. ❗️ Только до 23:59 12 июля действуют специальные цены и бонусы: 🎁 3 месяца участие в сообществе РеФорма ПРО (

4👍1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC427 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1

11 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC499 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🙏32

11 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC386 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔴Мы начинаем открытую онлайн-встречу с Александром Колмановским «Почините моего ребенка. Он неправильно питается» ЗАХОДИТЕ

10 Jul 2026, 06:18 UTC413 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Сделайте так, чтобы он нормально ел» «Объясните ей, что она все придумывает» «Исправьте его отношение к еде» Коллеги-специалисты, поставьте огонек 🔥, если слышите такое регулярно. Так говорят родители, которые уже испробовали все «семейные методы», и ни один из них не помог. Тревожно, когда ребенок перестает есть или, наоборот, начинает есть очень много и быстро, или прячет еду… Кажется, что нужно срочно исправит

6🔥2👍1

9 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC359 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Я же хочу как лучше!». Фразы, в которые родители вкладывают одно, а ребёнок слышит совсем другое Когда у ребенка появляются сложности с едой, родители тревожатся. Слова и фразы, продиктованные этой тревогой, могут лишь усиливать напряжение. Вот как подросток слышит родительские фразы: 1. «Ты опять ничего не поел?» = «родителю не интересны мои чувства (голод/сытость)» 2. «Ну посмотри, какой ты худой!» или «Ты опя

👍3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @reforma_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,196,436 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Комиссарова ☀️
@doctor_komissarova · 97,730
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Дарья Черненко | Меню недели 🍏 | Кулинарная школа
@Dasha_Chernenko · 91,138
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
СЪЕДОБНЫЙ НАУЧПОП
@e_semika · 45,893
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РеФорма | Психология, питание и работа с весом” (@reforma_life), 3,974 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reforma_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.