Абсолютно влюбилась в аэрогриль Почему? В 2 раза быстрее Лучок к дополнение к духовке А у вас есть аэрогриль? Что готовите?
🔥8

Channel
@dietologmelekhina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,656subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001587374880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dietologmelekhina |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dietologmelekhina |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 2,656 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 2,660 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 2,661 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 2,662 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 2,666 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 2,671 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 2,670 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 2,671 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 2,662 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 2,663 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 2,662 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 2,662 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 106 | 67.5% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 5.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Абсолютно влюбилась в аэрогриль Почему? В 2 раза быстрее Лучок к дополнение к духовке А у вас есть аэрогриль? Что готовите?
🔥8
Все хотят узнать от диетолога, что есть и сколько есть, чтобы похудеть. Но очень часто проблема не только в этом. Не менее важно — как мы едим. Сегодня предлагаю поговорить о месте приёма пищи. 🍽 В современных европейских рекомендациях по лечению ожирения есть простая рекомендация: «Ешьте за столом». Почему это важно? Когда мы едим, сидя за столом, из своей тарелки, мозгу проще воспринимать этот эпизод как полно…
👍8❤6
Ходила со старшей дочкой на пляж и вот о чём подумала. Когда она была маленькой, мне нужно было смотреть, чтобы она не утонула. А теперь ей десять, она прекрасно плавает — и всё равно просит меня стоять рядом и смотреть, как она ныряет, кувыркается и как у неё всё получается. Видимо, мы всегда нужны нашим детям. Просто по-разному😌
❤25🔥1
Вечером варили креветки по-французски: 250мо белого вина 250 мл воды 1 луковица лучше шалот 1 морковь В кипящий бульон с овощами отправить креветки на 5 мин Потом вынуть Очень вкусно 😋
👍13❤1
Сегодня готовлю яйца в кокотнице. Продолжаю осваивать книгу о французской кухне от Джулии Чайлд 📖 И адаптирую её реалии совоеменности ✨ А вообще приготовление новых рецептов - это мое хобби, которое хорошо помогает отвлечься и снизить тревогу Что вы чаще готовите из яиц? Варите или жарите?
❤11
Channel photo updated
Хочу спросить у вас👇 Нужен ли вам сейчас онлайн-тренинг о том, как сохранять психологическую устойчивость, когда тревога и неопределённость стали постоянным фоном жизни?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
Вчера многие узнали себя в описании длительного стресса. И мне хочется сказать одну важную вещь: задача не в том, чтобы заставить себя «не тревожиться». Тревога — естественная реакция нервной системы на неопределённость и возможную угрозу. Если обстоятельства продолжают меняться, а ясного завершения нет, организм не получает сигнала: «Опасность закончилась, теперь можно расслабиться». Поэтому человеку может быть …
❤9
Хочу вас спросить: что из этого вы сейчас чаще замечаете у себя?
The shares total 225%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что сейчас происходит Последнее время я всё чаще думаю и обсуждаю на консультациях то, сколько напряжения сейчас выдерживают люди. Кто-то живёт там, где регулярно слышны тревоги и взрывы. Кто-то переживает за близких. Кто-то боится за работу и бизнес, сталкивается с перебоями связи и невозможностью нормально планировать даже ближайшие месяцы. И даже если прямо сейчас вокруг относительно спокойно, внутри спокойст…
❤19
Если ищите вдохновения для изменения питания, образа жизни и веса, загляните на наш сайт. Сегодня добавила туда 4 истории, которые написали наши клиенты Dietologmelekhina.com
❤7
Сегодня у нас был обед вдвоём с сыном. Завтра он уезжает в очередной лагерь, и мне хотелось провести немного времени только с ним — без остальных детей и мужа. Мы пошли в наше любимое кафе. Давайте посмотрим, что мы выбрали. Я взяла боул с тартаром из тунца: много зелени, рис, сырой тунец кубиками, половина авокадо, эдамаме, кукуруза, имбирь, соевый соус и ещё много всего. Было очень вкусно, но больше половины рис…
👍8❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dietologmelekhina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу спросить у вас👇 Нужен ли вам сейчас онлайн-тренинг о том, как сохранять психологическую устойчивость, когда тревога и неопределённость стали постоянным фоном жизни?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Хочу вас спросить: что из этого вы сейчас чаще замечаете у себя?
The shares total 225%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Диетолог Анна Мелехина” (@dietologmelekhina), 2,656 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dietologmelekhina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.