Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Doc.equimos

@doc_equimos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,603subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692158941
TypeChannel
Username@doc_equimos
DescriptionВрач Ольга Горячева обо всём к.м.н., гастроэнтеролог, педиатр доцент кафедры ПДБ РНИМУ, медлид Докдети, Автормед очно Докдети, Софт Медикал Сентр онлайн Номер заявления на регистрацию в Роскомнадзоре: № 5940471450 #HDBFF
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/doc_equimos

Growth

10,60310,62710,6156 August 2026 — 10,627 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,626 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,622 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,618 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,614 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,603 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,599–10,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:1210,603-3
10 Aug 2026, 21:3210,606-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:1110,614-4
8 Aug 2026, 23:0210,618-4
7 Aug 2026, 22:5410,622-4
6 Aug 2026, 21:5810,626-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:3110,627first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.68%
avg views ÷ 10,603 subscribers
Avg views / post
708
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held32 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total22,652
Reactions total494
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,700
Videos
777
Links
995

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 32 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22846.2%
🔥10320.9%
❤‍🔥8316.8%
😁316.28%
👍285.67%
💯71.42%
💋61.21%
🥰61.21%
💘20.405%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC234 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @docmaschoolPhoto

🍎🔥 СЕГОДНЯ — день открытых дверей гастро Курс — это не только деньги Еще вечера после приемов, время между дежурствами и силы, которые придется вложить в учебу 🤌 Поэтому одного списка модулей мало! Сегодня в 19:00 мск Ольга Горячева и Андрей Симаков покажут, как на самом деле устроен курс по гастроэнтерологии ↓↓↓ — что входит в программу — насколько глубоко разбирают темы — какую нагрузку закладывать в свой графи

👍31❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC444 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6🔥6

11 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC439 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥41

11 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC434 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @demidovams

Люди либо хорошо работают, либо красиво рассказывают о том, как хорошо работают Чем дальше, тем больше в этом убеждаюсь Если тебе кажется, что на человеке в команде все держится, это чаще всего иллюзия, он просто умеет грамотно пиарить свою работу и ценность Бывает расстанешься с сотрудником, и вся команда в шоке - как мы теперь без него? На нем же столько всего держалось??? Нет) он просто красиво рассказывал А

💯71

10 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC662 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У меня всегда один офтальмолог и это Айхам Жаруа Хожу к нему в родной Автормед

❤‍🔥102

10 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC683 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7🥰31

10 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC686 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

9 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC830 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вчера была на годовщине свадьбы друзей А сегодня в 2 р больше отмечаем другим друзьям Очень важным 46 лет - это не шутки

❤‍🔥4112

9 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC828 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А это вчерашний день

🔥15👍51😁1

8 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC824 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/pushkinshow Мы были) а вы?)

11

7 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC825 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @neurogastroenterologyPhoto

Пора строить маршрут до НЕЙРОГАСТРО 3.0 ❤️ Если вы едете к нам из другого города, этот пост точно стоит сохранить. 📍 5 сентября встречаемся в Международной промышленной академии: 🇷🇺 Москва, 1-й Щипковский пер., д. 20. В карточках собрали всё, что пригодится перед поездкой: ⏺как добраться до площадки; ⏺на какие станции метро ориентироваться; ⏺где можно остановиться рядом; ⏺что лучше предусмотреть заранее. 🇷🇺Ближ

4👍2🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC781 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

«Сны Пушкина» танец поэта и Натальи Гончаровой https://t.me/pushkinshow

7👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @doc_equimos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@doc_equimos edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 150,691 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Doc.equimos” (@doc_equimos), 10,603 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doc_equimos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.