Channel
@strelets_molodec
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
354,527subscribers
-6,171 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001451940989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @strelets_molodec |
| Description | Пропагандист здравого смысла и хорошего вкуса Реклама: [email protected] Обратная связь: @nadin_strelets Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3FHRnL |
| Created | 31 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/strelets_molodec |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 354,527 | -937 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 355,464 | -240 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 355,704 | -179 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 355,883 | -293 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 356,176 | -293 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 356,469 | -609 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 357,078 | -250 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 357,328 | -114 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 357,442 | -146 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:13 | 357,588 | -162 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 357,750 | -141 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 357,891 | -98 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 357,989 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 357,991 | -74 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 358,065 | -165 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 358,230 | -103 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 358,333 | -158 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 358,491 | -230 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 358,721 | -156 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 358,877 | first reading |
456 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 456 (4 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,074,080 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Настоящий талант Бритни, который был никому не нужен Бритни изначально обладала глубоким, альтовым, естественным и очень сочным голосом в стиле соул и блюз, чем-то похожим на молодую Дженис Джоплин. Но звукозаписывающий гигант Jive Records и шведский хитмейкер Макс Мартин понимали: глубокий соло-вокал не продаст миллионы копий подросткам. Ей буквально заламывают голосовые связки. Продюсеры заставляют ее изменить тех…
5 красивых боди на осень Intimissimi, 4899 руб. Та самая идеальная база. Теплое, но тонкое, из модала с кашемиром. Хорошо будет выглядеть и просто так, и под жакетом. Brusnika, 12 100 руб. Для самых женственных образов. Красиво подчеркивает плечи и хорошо сочетается с юбками любой длины. 12STOREEZ, 11 000 руб. На каждый день, как альтернатива лонгсливу. Из шерсти с шелком, небанального лазурного оттенка. Namelazz…
Вечерняя медитация
Муд
Самый тяжелый этап пробуждения — это когда ты вдруг начинаешь замечать все: игры, в которые играют люди, фальшь за улыбками, скрытые мотивы, манипуляции, ложь, которую люди называют правдой. И однажды увиденное уже невозможно развидеть. Но самое страшное — ты начинаешь видеть правду о себе. Свои страхи, свои зависимости, комплексы, эго, программы и ограничения, наложенные на тебя с самого детства. И как только ты на…
Мне все ближе камерность проживания, отказ от слишком больших пространств, слишком широкого круга общения, слишком грандиозных целей, слишком громких заявлений. Все ближе потеря однозначной категоричности, напористой активности, суетной вездесущности. Все ближе многооттеночность своих настроений, в каждом из которых свой особый смысл, который я больше не свожу к одному – крайне выигрышному с точки зрения стереотипног…
Никто не рисовал шелк так, как он Он писал шелк так, что хотелось потрогать холст. Витторио Реджанини работал в конце XIX века — и специализировался на том, что почти невозможно передать кистью: блеск атласа, мягкость складок, игру отраженного света на ткани. Его аристократические сцены выглядят как остановленный момент из другой эпохи — изысканной, медлительной, ушедшей навсегда. Один из тех художников, которых ма…
Рубрика «Хочу/могу» Жакет Miu Miu, €6500 (около 653 000 руб.) VS Жакет O’STIN, 6999 руб.
Это база: 5 красивых водолазок на осень IDOL, 12 990 руб. Из полупрозрачной шерсти и мохера — тепло и соблазнительно одновременно, а это редкое сочетание. Daisyknit, 14 890 руб. Отличная база в офис, которая выглядит оригинально за счет ворота на пуговицах. Хорошо будет смотреться и просто так, и под жакет. 1811 Eighteen One One, 15 990 руб. Идеал на каждый день: облегающий силуэт, удлиненные рукава и трендовый ол…
Вечерняя медитация
Мем дня
50 лет в 1986 году и 50 лет в 2026 году
Showing the 12 most recent of 456 posts we hold for @strelets_molodec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@strelets_molodec edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опрос дня
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 456 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 296 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1,199 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стрелец-Молодец” (@strelets_molodec), 354,527 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strelets_molodec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.