Channel
@kamitova_pro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,386subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001113986121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kamitova_pro |
| Created | 9 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kamitova_pro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 1,386 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 1,385 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 1,391 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 1,390 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 1,391 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,391 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 364 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 92 | 48.9% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 7.45% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.72% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 3.19% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.66% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.532% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Моя хорошая подруга Катя создала короткометражный фильм о цикле насилия и выживании. Мужчины-викинги ушли в море, на горизонте появляются корабли врага. В северной деревне остались лишь несколько раненых воинов, женщины и старики. Теперь именно им предстоит защитить свой дом. Премьера сегодня, 7 августа, в 12.00 по МСК по ссылке https://youtu.be/ZBa6bNk3FJ4
❤1
Схема покинутости - часть 2 Когда включается эта схема, человек может реагировать по-разному: Замри (капитуляция) Человек снова и снова выбирает непредсказуемых или эмоционально недоступных партнеров: импульсивных, то появляющихся, то исчезающих, нарциссичных, женатых или замужних. Он вновь проживает знакомый детский опыт отвержения. Появляется готовность терпеть унижения, насилие и пренебрежение, лишь бы не сто…
❤4
Схема Покинутости / Отвержения / Нестабильности: «Не оставляй меня пожалуйста» - часть 1 Когда кажется, что близкие отношения ненадежны, а важные люди рано или поздно уйдут, бросят, умрут или эмоционально отдалятся. В отношениях нет ощущения стабильности и безопасности, поэтому человек постоянно сканирует происходящее в поисках признаков отвержения. Это постоянная тревога и мучительное ожидание того, что с близкими…
❤9🔥2
Покопавшись в настройках ТГ, вроде бы нашла кнопки как ограничить сообщения от «книголюбов»😄 Тех, которые пишут что-то в духе «Прочитал «Богатый папа, бедный папа» и моя жизнь изменилась! Стучите в личку, скину вам» (имхо Кийосаки - неоднозначный эксперт). Посмотрим, сработают ли нажатые 2 кнопки в настройках. Если да, то будет меньше спама, но останемся финансово безграмотными и не сможем выйти на доход х100500😄😄😄
😁16👍7❤3
Со стороны может казаться, что работа психолога простая: сидишь и киваешь 50 минут (уже вижу лица коллег, которые прочитали это😄) Сейчас у нескольких моих клиентов кризисный период, который сопровождается действиями, угрожающими жизни. Периодически проваливаюсь в сильный страх, ощущение безысходности, «летит» сон, тошнит и кружится голова. Просто невозможно полностью отключиться от нестерпимой боли клиента. Да, ест…
❤16🕊6💔2🥰1
Какой?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вопрос повышенной важности: какой чехол вы бы выбрали?😄 Еще есть Лирика, Триттико, Фенибут, Велаксин, Оланзапин
😁9
И снова про схемы, они же повторяющиеся шаблоны, сценарии жизни, которые кто-то может принимать даже за мистику🔮
❤11🔥3⚡2👍1
Небольшой анонс 🤍 С 10 сентября для новых клиентов стоимость терапии расстройств пищевого поведения меняется. Если вы уже в терапии со мной, для вас цена остаётся прежней, это касается только тех, кто присоединится позже. В работе я использую схема-терапию, ЕМДР и КБТ-У — доказательные подходы, эффективность которых подтверждена исследованиями именно при РПП. Сейчас есть возможность начать работу по действующей ст…
❤7🔥5🤔1
Понравилось видео о том, почему мы не уходим оттуда, где нам плохо. Это касается не только романтических отношений https://youtu.be/Gh5x_z63gNk?si=jixih1wkVB952Igx
❤7👍1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
Анонс❗️ В эту пятницу проведем быстренькую встречу, где я расскажу: ⚙️ Как работают и раскрываются Схемы через определенный паттерн 🪓 Как Схемы вызывают боль, как они подключают Критиков 🔩 И самое важное звено: поведение, закрепляющее саму эту Схему и эту боль Планирую справиться за 15 минут. Так же предлагаю формат по ссылке в конференции, чтобы можно было легко задать вопросы, так как получили обратную связь, чт…
❤3🔥1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kamitova_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 307,781 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аня Камитова. Клинический психолог” (@kamitova_pro), 1,386 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamitova_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.