Channel
@tunakimbab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
164subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002519878573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tunakimbab |
| Description | 크립토에서 재밌는것들 빌딩해보는방 채팅방 - @tunakimbabchat 문의 - @kimbab78 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tunakimbab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 164 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 164 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
26 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 73.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😎 주말에 매실남팬미팅 갔다온 후기 22년에 NFT로 코인 입문하면서 매실남 이름 만들어지기 전부터 활동할 때 알게된 사람인데 둘 다 서로 밖에 잘 나오는 성격이 아니라 맨날 한번 꼭 봐야지 말만 하면서 못 만나다가 매실남을 세상 밖으로 나오게 한 건 강한 바람도 따뜻한 햇살도 아닌 사이드킥 결승전을 계기로..(중략) 아무튼 그래서 올림픽도 아닌데 4년만에 만남 성사 매직님 덕분에 신라호텔에서 다같이 모여서 밥 먹었는데 매실남 이사람 늦게 도착할 거 같다 그래서 먼저 들어가서 먹으려는데 직원분이 계속 예약자 이름으로 된 일행이 있다고 그래서 엥? 그럴리없다고 입구에서 5분동안 다같이 사이드카 발동했는데 알고보니 매실남 먼저 와있었음;; 어이업다 어쨌든 만나니깐 형들 얘기하는 거 재밌어서 조용히 듣고 있다가 중간중간 몰래 매실남이랑 대화주…
❤1
헉 벌써재밌다 종현님 사랑합니다. 친구들불러서 다같이 놀아볼게요
이미있었구나
기존에 클로드코드 알아서 잘 쓰시던 분들은 굳이 오픈클로를 시도해보기 전에 takopi 를 써봅시다. Yearn finance 개발자인 banteg 가 만든건데(이새끼 요즘 이거밖에 안함) 단순히 텔레그램을 클로드코드와 연결해주는 역할을 합니다. https://takopi.dev/
요새 너무 행복하네요. openclaw는 너무 무겁고 토큰도 많이 들고 보안관리하기도 귀찮고 근데 밖에서 코딩을 하고싶고 해서 직접 만들어봤습니다. 아직 첫번째 버젼이여서 여러가지 개선사항이 많긴한데 그냥 밖에서 적당히 코딩할정도는 되는것같아요. 요 몇일 잘쓰다가 이제야 깃허브 올리네요 nestJS 서버 구동 + 텔레봇 연동 이거두개로 그냥 간단하게 vscode가볍게 따라하면서 cluade code만 이용할수있도록 만들었습니다. 아마 비개발자 분들이 사용하기에는 무리가 많을것같은데 개발자분들은 꽤 편하게 이용가능할것같네요!! (혹시 쓰시면 스타좀…) https://github.com/fghy788/telegramcode 쓰실분은 맘대로 써주세요! 그리고 혹시 더 발전시켜주시면 환영입니다!!
❤5🫡2👍1
몇안되는 방이지만 새해복 많이받으세요!! 올해는 좀 왕성하게 활동해보겠습니다!!
❤10👍2🔥2
Lighter TGE 후기와 2025년 결산 초록 올해 최대의 기대주였던 Lighter가 오늘 드디어 TGE를 했습니다 우선 시장 상황이 상당히 좋지 않음에도 12월 TGE와 계획한 커뮤니티 할당도 지켜준 팀에 감사하네요 Lighter 에어드랍은 개인적으로 뜻깊은게 저는 작년에 하이퍼리퀴드 에어드랍을 놓치고 굉장히 힘들었어요. 돈도 돈이지만 에어드랍 파머이자 디젠이라면 반드시 참석해야할 축제에 함께하지 못하는 그 박탈감이 너무 컸습니다. 그때부터 나름 절치부심하며 친한분들과 농담으로 하이퍼리퀴드 복수한다 라는 친목방도 만들어 버티면서 2025년을 준비했는데 이렇게 좋은 결과가 나와서 다행이에요 2025년은 제 크립토 인생의 터닝포인트 같습니다. 사실 크립토 인생이 아니라 제 인생의 터닝포인트 같아요. 올해 처음 크립토 업계를 경험하며 …
❓ 수년간 특정 프로젝트를 지지하신 분을 여러분은 아시나요. 아마 여러분도 아시는 분일겁니다. 바로 머니스택님. 이름부터 "스택스"의 스택이 들어가는. 스택스 생태계를 지지하시면서 여러가지 것들을 소개해주신 분입니다. 그리고 오늘 머니스택님이 트위터에 글을 쓰셨는데요. "이제 제 에너지를 다른 곳으로 옮길 때가 된 것 같아요. 이런 상태로 떠날 줄은 상상도 못 했지만, 정말 피곤하네요. 저는 지금 물러나겠습니다. 생태계가 이 순간을 통해 반성하기를 바랍니다." https://x.com/MoneyStack9/status/1995678881853104261?s=20 저는 생태계를 초기부터 지지하던 사람들이 큰 보상을 받기를 바랍니다. 소위 말하는 프로젝트와 사랑에 빠진 사람들이 정말로 좋은 보상을 받았으면 좋겠습니다. 하지만.... …
Based 한국 커뮤니티 AMA🧡 Based가 한국 커뮤니티를 개설함과 동시에 현재 Based에 대한 진행상황을 공유하고 커뮤니티 멤버들의 의견을 더욱 소중히 여길 시기라고 판단되어 Based 커뮤니티 멤버들을 위한 AMA를 준비했습니다. 🟢장소: Based 한국 채팅방 🟢시간 : 11/5(목) 22:00 KST 🟢Speaker : Edison (Based Founder)/Po (Based Builder) 🟢Host : John smith (Based Moderator) 🟢질문 : 구글폼에 사전질문 제출 🟢질문제출 기한 : ~11/5(목) 21:00 KST 🟢진행방식 : Text AMA로 진행되며 구글폼에 제출된 질문을 취합하여 Edison이 직접 답변 여러분의 소중한 질문은 프로젝트가 발전하는 데 귀중한 자산이 됩니다. 많은 참여 …
❤2
요건 취소하고 다른 이벤트로할게용.. 너무늦어버렸다
🧠 Mind Host 이벤트 솔라나 해커톤 출품 기념 특별 이벤트! 오랜만에 솔라나 해커톤에 참가하면서, 재미있는 아이디어를 참치김밥님이 제안해주셨습니다. 개인이나 밈코인 프로젝트가 ‘카이토’를 직접 운영한다면 훨씬 더 재미있는 글과 상황이 나오지 않을까 하는 생각에서 출발했습니다. 그 결과 탄생한 플랫폼이 바로 👉 Mind Host 입니다! 💡 Mind Host란? 트위터(X) 콘텐츠 중심의 마인드쉐어 평가 플랫폼입니다. 트윗을 링크로 올리면 AI와 커뮤니티가 점수를 매기고, 즉각적인 보상을 받을 수 있습니다. 현재 기능은 간단하게 구성되어 있습니다 트윗 링크 업로드 → 점수 평가 순위에 따라 상금 클레임 가능 평가 방식: 1️⃣ 이벤트 개최자가 직접 학습시킨 AI (개발 중) 2️⃣ 이벤트 개최자 3️⃣ 커뮤니티 평가 (개발 중…
❤1
존스미스 만세
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tunakimbab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 994,028 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tunakimbab named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“빌더가 되고싶은 참김방” (@tunakimbab), 164 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tunakimbab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.