Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Панасюк Николай

Channel

Панасюк Николай

@getfit_nutrition

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

70,575subscribers

+163 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575255069
TypeChannel
Username@getfit_nutrition
DescriptionЛичный и экспертный канал основателя академии нутрициологии GetFit. 3 книги, YouTube 1 млн, 7000 студентов из 43 стран мира за 10 лет. Папа в декрете❤️‍🔥 Реклама, спам, консультации — бан без смазки. Регистрация канала: https://clck.ru/3EukHP
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/getfit_nutrition

Growth

70,41170,57770,4947 August 2026 — 70,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,412 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,411 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70,431 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70,452 subscribers11 August 2026 — 70,456 subscribers12 August 2026 — 70,482 subscribers13 August 2026 — 70,488 subscribers15 August 2026 — 70,518 subscribers16 August 2026 — 70,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 70,577 subscribers18 August 2026 — 70,567 subscribers19 August 2026 — 70,575 subscribers70,5757 August 202619 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net +163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,386–70,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 18:1270,575+8
18 Aug 2026, 20:1570,567-10
17 Aug 2026, 20:2470,577+15
16 Aug 2026, 17:4770,562+44
15 Aug 2026, 00:4870,518+30
13 Aug 2026, 17:5870,488+6
12 Aug 2026, 14:3570,482+26
11 Aug 2026, 12:0770,456+4
10 Aug 2026, 10:4270,452+21
9 Aug 2026, 10:3170,431+20
8 Aug 2026, 08:1670,411-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:0070,412no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:5470,412first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.80%
avg views ÷ 70,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,680
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held44 (24 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total117,854
Reactions total3,204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,460
Videos
1,050
Links
848

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 15s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,204 reactions across 44 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,38843.3%
1,13435.4%
🙏2056.40%
🎉1865.81%
😁1865.81%
😭290.905%
😱270.843%
🤡190.593%
🤔110.343%
🦄60.187%
💩50.156%
🌭40.125%
👎20.062%
💊20.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 44 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @getfit_nutrition. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC544 views11 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Иногда лекарства становятся плохим бизнесом именно потому, что слишком хорошо лечат. Звучит как конспирология, но в 2018 году Goldman Sachs буквально выпустил для инвесторов в биотех отчет с разделом «Устойчивая ли бизнес-модель излечивать пациентов?». Давайте возьмем на примере проблемы гепатита С. Новые препараты излечивали более 90% пациентов, но если вы вылечили человека, он больше не покупает лекарства. Верно

10🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Мясо 🥩 и мясные продукты. Эпизод второй. Через 20 минут старт..🔥🙌🍿 Сегодня разберем: Курица. - Гормоны и антибиотики — правда или развод? Ситуация на рынке. - Что на самом деле лежит в вашей тарелке и как выбрать ту, что не навредит. - Берем курицу для лабораторного исследования. Колбаса. - Главный вопрос — есть ли там мясо? Или это сплошная «химия»? - Дорогая колбаса против дешевой: может ли быть разница ил

7🔥3🎉2🙏1

18 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈1,560 views101 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Одни из худших клиентов в моей жизни — родители. Если маму хоть как-то осенило (и то после многих лет моих нравоучений до этого) уже после операции на оба глаза по замене хрусталиков и реальная угроза диабетической стопы после открытой раны, то отцу просто похер. Вот прям по-хе-ру! Ну и вот итог. Отцу стало плохо. В этот раз прям серьезно. Обычно нитроглицерином спасались. Единственное, что принимал. Потому что в

🙏7917🔥2😭2🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,630 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

30 минут до старта расследования по продуктам..🔥🙌🍿 Вход тут: Клик Клик Увидимся 🤙

🔥53🎉2

17 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,830 views51 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Максимально бессмысленный контент. Нутрициолог поит молоком теленка. Готовился к завтрашнему показу расследования по продуктам и искал материалы и наткнулся на это. Решил поделиться. Просто. Не ищите смысла. Просто люблю свое дело. Свой проект. И свою жизнь. p.s. А иногда смотрю на себя со стороны и думаю: - Вот, конечно, конченный.. так заморачиваться по теме питания и здоровья.. ездить куда-то.. приключения с

38🙏7🔥6

17 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,760 views135 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Вопрос к тем, у кого есть дети. А это нормально, что от неземной любви до желания сдать в детдом может пройти одна минута?

😁117🔥76👎2😭2🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,840 views47 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

👎Дорогое молоко — хуже дешевого. Фермерская колбаса — такая же как и эконом из магазина. И еще таких же 20+ выводов я сделал после исследования нынешних продуктов в лаборатории. Помните фразы: - Продукты изменились. - Вот раньше было лучше. - Если есть фермерские продукты, будешь здоров. - Дорогие продукты лучше, чем эконом сегмента. - Продукты из деревни — кладезь пользы. Откуда эти фразы? Верно. Это убежде

🔥2513🙏5🎉3😱1

16 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,980 views155 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

10 лет мечтал сделать это фото❤️‍🔥 Почему — писал тут. Три поколения за 80 лет на одном фото..

97🔥48🙏10

15 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈2,320 views43 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

👀Если вы хотите посмотреть как я разваливаю сельское хозяйство и как мне приплачивают евреи — заходите на наше расследование по теме продуктов. Вход тут: 👉 Хочу посмотреть расследование по продуктам и узнать кто на самом деле есть Николай p.s. Для контекста: предложил этой женщине взять молоко и ее продукцию с ее хозяйства и проверить в лаборатории. На что получил вот такой ответ. p.s.2 Господи.. Какой кал в го

😁2513🦄3🤡1😱1

14 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈2,310 views56 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Знаете в чем одна из самых больших проблем всех нутрициологов? По моему мнению. В нахождение со своим клиентом на разных полюсах. Один проживает проблему. А виорой только знает эту проблему в теории. Он сам «там» никогда не был. Приведу пример. Вот есть дефицит железа. Вроде как надо есть продукты с железом. Типа субпродукты, мясо и животный белок. Потому что в свекле, гречке и яблоке негеммовое и хуже усваивае

🔥4013🦄2💩1

14 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈2,040 views79 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

Я не самый талантливый и не самый одаренный. Факт. Но я переработаю всех своим упоротым упорством, количеством часов и попыток и фанатичной верой в цель. Потому что я видел сотни одаренных и талантливых людей. Но побеждает все равно упоротый в свою цель и идет к ней постепенно и постоянно. Шмель не знает, что согласно законами аэродинамики он не должен был летать. p.s. Начал изучать новое движение: нужно встать

🔥6113🌭2😁2🦄1

13 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈2,280 views57 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

🥛После чего я перестал есть молочку или откуда там «мясной клей». 2020 год. Уже 3 года как развиваю свой проект по нутрициологии. Уровень погружению в пищевую промышленность в сравнении с сегодняшним — «на мелководье». Небо и земля. Я тогда искренне верил, что без молочки невозможно добрать кальций, фосфор и прочие микро-/макроэлементы. Да и в целом: молочка же — важный продукт питания и как без нее вообще жить.

34😱13🔥7😭2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @getfit_nutrition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 286,748 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MOLODAY
@molodayproduct · 151,502
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Руслан Масгутов
@rusmasgutov · 145,163
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Тимофей Кармацкий
@karmatsky_timofey · 186,769
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Пенкин Егор - Здоровое будущее
@fit_therapy · 79,551
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Панасюк Николай” (@getfit_nutrition), 70,575 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getfit_nutrition.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.