Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,211–1,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 09:59
1,216
+1
9 Sept 2026, 13:17
1,215
+2
6 Sept 2026, 10:23
1,213
no change
4 Sept 2026, 16:22
1,213
-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:37
1,214
-7
28 Aug 2026, 21:44
1,221
+1
25 Aug 2026, 21:13
1,220
+2
22 Aug 2026, 19:17
1,218
-4
19 Aug 2026, 13:43
1,222
+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:58
1,221
-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:36
1,222
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:20
1,224
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.30%
avg views ÷ 1,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
69.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 3 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
3 (21 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
129
Reactions total
89
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
28.8%
custom 5764645636574025233
12
9.60%
custom 5765064013633298028
12
9.60%
custom 5764766307975172461
9
7.20%
custom 5895547727130922447
9
7.20%
custom 5895593455647723261
9
7.20%
custom 5456440866472210184
8
6.40%
custom 5458586271356038846
8
6.40%
custom 5458666183517547148
7
5.60%
custom 5895305130198175230
7
5.60%
👍
5
4.00%
⚡
2
1.60%
😡
1
0.8%
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С началом ❤️
⛱️ ✨✨⛱️✨✨
⛱️✨✨⛱️✨✨⛱️✨
⛱️✨✨⛱️, мои хорошие!
А кого-то и с началом нового важного этапа в жизни! Нас, например.
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Сын перешел не просто в среднюю школу. Он перешел совсем в новую школу, которая находится на другом конце Москвы. Но, однозначно, школа того стоит, чтобы в нее переходить.
➡️ И пока мы решаем организационные вопросы, дни выдаются очень суматошные. Надеюсь, скоро станет полегче.
❤️❤️❤️…
Дорогие мои! ❤️
Кто из москвичей уже слышал про фестиваль самодельных летательных аппаратов «🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝🌝» в парке искусств «Музеон»? Он прошел 22 августа и нашумел так, что многие обсуждают его до сих пор!
😌 Я тоже подготовила материал, но из-за всех навалившихся проблем никак не могла найти пару свободных часиков, чтобы его обработать. С опозданием, но рассказываю, что интересного было!
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Зрители фестиваля на н…
«Одно лечим, другое калечим». 🤦♂️ Классика.
⬆️⬆️⬆️
Ночь после операции провела с болью в запястье от установки внутривенного катетера для инъекции анастезии. А утром проснулась с отекшим и сильно покрасневшим предплечьем. Весьма неприятно, скажу я вам!
У меня такое впервые. Повезло, что моя мама врач, по симптомам она сразу предположила флебит и сказала срочно идти к хирургу. Пришлось снова вместо работы бежать к…
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @PPutkzdorovyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Moloday | Снижение биологического возраста @recipes_prozdorovie · 23,849 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 17 September 2026
Лилия Стародубцева | Нутрициолог @lilystarfit_blog · 24,221 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
MOLODAY @molodayproduct · 149,552 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
MOLODAY|здоровье в любом возрасте @MolodayHealth · 28,976 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
Leonov chef @leonovchef · 51,482 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Будь Легкой В 35+ с Лелей Савосиной @lelyasavosina · 32,845 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Николай Панасюк | Нутрициология | GetFit @nikolay_panasiuk · 37,284 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Мария Коновалова - Всё о женском здоровье @dockonovalovamarija · 62,924 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
Панасюк Николай @getfit_nutrition · 70,835 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
PRO питание и БАДы | Диляра Лебедева гастроэнтеролог @stomach_lebedeva · 63,539 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Путешествие к здоровью🍀” (@PPutkzdorovyu), 1,216 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PPutkzdorovyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.