Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Русский ориенталист” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 129,104–130,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:38
130,371
+45
16 Sept 2026, 03:01
130,326
+28
14 Sept 2026, 07:17
130,298
+91
12 Sept 2026, 16:17
130,207
+112
10 Sept 2026, 13:01
130,095
+167
7 Sept 2026, 10:38
129,928
-38
4 Sept 2026, 17:38
129,966
+6
3 Sept 2026, 02:23
129,960
-26
2 Sept 2026, 03:05
129,986
-9
1 Sept 2026, 00:55
129,995
-19
30 Aug 2026, 20:46
130,014
-20
29 Aug 2026, 18:22
130,034
-4
28 Aug 2026, 18:45
130,038
+23
27 Aug 2026, 18:45
130,015
+83
26 Aug 2026, 17:06
129,932
+223
25 Aug 2026, 19:12
129,709
+81
24 Aug 2026, 20:08
129,628
+213
23 Aug 2026, 05:57
129,415
-29
21 Aug 2026, 15:43
129,444
-1
20 Aug 2026, 16:44
129,445
first reading
Engagement
216 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 130,371 subscribers
Avg views / post
44,400
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 216 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
216 (31 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
4,931,300
Reactions total
80,605
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 00:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,410
Videos
≈1,840
Links
≈7,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
58m 47s
Average length
2m 33s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
158,608 reactions across 213 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
59,539
37.5%
👍
53,613
33.8%
😢
31,874
20.1%
👎
13,582
8.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 216 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
326
across the posts below
Posts paid on
83
of 216 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
118
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @russ_orientalist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 216 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.926%
2 of 216 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
34,600
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
44,800
over 214 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvtYZ6T
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
2W5zFHXDpxq
1
15 September 2026
15 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В ленте последние недели из России сплошные медвежьи новости: медведь вышел к посёлку, медведь задрал грибника, медведь хозяйничает на свалке. Решил посмотреть, как с этим у соседей, например в Финляндии.
Я ездил туда в юности, жил на лесной ферме и даже успел несколько дней поработать на хозяйстве, где разводили для дикой природы кабанов и лосей. Лес там северный, как в Карелии, и медведей хватает: их около двух ты…
В сети разлетелись фото кресел в зале заседаний штаб-квартиры ООН в Нью-Йорке. Такая символическая иллюстрация упадка главной международной организации. ООН оказалась не в состоянии решить текущие конфликты и не сможет остановить приближающиеся новые. Совет Безопасности ООН с постоянными членами имеющими право вето не отражает реального распределения сил в мире. США злоупотребляют тем, что штаб-квартира находится у н…
Российские блогеры всерьез обсуждают приезд Зеленского в Москву. Мол почему этот просроченный клоун откажется, ведь ему ничего не угрожает? Москва - безопасный город. Как-то даже выход на границы областей перестали обсуждать. Не раз вам писал - война России с Украиной идёт за то, чтоб показать этому выскочке его место. И ещё чтоб хохлы не обзывались.
Как иранцы видят россиян и Москву?
Опрос иранцев на эту тему приведен в «Вестнике антропологии», №1, 2026.
Лично меня поразило, что даже иранцы считают жизнь москвичей, их жильё тесным:
«Около трети участников отмечают разницу в темпераментах, при этом в большинстве ответов они используют формулировку, что иранцы являются «теплокровными» («warm-blooded», « مرگ نوخ »), что означает, что они более экспрессивные, друже…
Мама отказалась от него в роддоме. 17 лет он борется в одиночку. Сейчас ему нужна операция — и никто, кроме нас, ему не поможет».
У Руслана ДЦП со спастическим тетрапарезом. Сильная спастика, контрактуры, вывих бёдер. Он почти не двигается. Его несут в зал на руках — тело согнуто, руки зажаты. Специалист пытается развести бёдра, но они не поддаются.
Он не сидит, не стоит, не говорит. Полностью зависит от взрослых: …
Канал Черный Лебедь разбирает неудачи ИИ и робототехники, выражает сомнения в огромных инвестициях направленных в эту сферу. Такая скептическая точка зрения на ИИ сейчас довольно широко распространена, и нужно сказать не на пустом месте. В публикации реальные факты. Три года корпорации внедряли искусственный интеллект, нанимали «руководителей по ИИ», переписывали презентации, а в отчётности этого не видно. Большая ча…
Выборы прошли.
Давайте думать, как нам жить и действовать дальше!
Уже на следующей неделе я поеду с лекциями в Сибирь и на Урал. А через две — на Юг России.
Это дополненный вариант лекции, которую я читал в Москве в апреле этого года. Я её назвал «Наше положение». Оммаж сами догадайтесь чему.
О чём я рассказываю? На самом деле это квинтэссенция моих думок последних лет по двум направлениям. Первое — что такое Рос…
Суд присяжных покидает чат
Дальше только хардкор! Верховный суд готовит реформу суда прияжных, благодаря которой тот де-факто перестанет существовать как институт.
На текущий момент доля оправдательных приговоров составляет 0.24% (ноль целых двадцать четыре сотых процента) от всех дел. Большинство из оправдательных приговоров вынесли суды присяжных.
Просто для справки. Во времена большого сталинского террора 1937-…
Статью о новой, короткой СВО в Прибалтике с РИА Новости убрали. Теперь ругают ее автора Носовича. Наверное, Носович обманным путем пробрался в государственное информагентство и без спросу написал свой фейк. Но ничего, зато теперь эти лабусы будут знать как мы решительно настроены.
Как вы знаете, ООН почти единогласно решила заменить проекцию Меркатора на более "справедливую" – ту, что точнее показывает площади стран (на ней Африка – большая и жирная, а Гренландия – с гулькин хер).
Коллеги предлагают пойти дальше – использовать проекцию, которая будет отражать размеры экономик тех или иных стран (на фото). Люблю такое.
😁788👍171👎60😢20
Signed Игорь Д
Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @russ_orientalist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@russ_orientalist edited 14 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 118 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 193 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Тени Руси @tenirusi · 25,524 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Narrative Досье @narrativeru · 29,593 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Интуиция подскажет @intuition2036 · 38,628 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
DarkZotovLand @darkzotovland · 105,209 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Кураев @akuraev · 26,877 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
Комиссар Исчезает @komissarischezaet · 31,146 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Д///ИХАД @tvjihad · 123,496 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
Тенденции эпохи @eratrends · 140,362 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Vault 8. Убежище №8. @vault8pro · 39,980 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Донбасский Кейс @donbasscase · 64,452 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Сыны Монархии/Роман Антоновский @SonOfMonarchy · 92,231 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Кремлёвский безБашенник @kremlebezBashennik · 67,001 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
artjockey @artjockey · 82,359 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Временное правительство 2.0 @neoreshkins · 28,707 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
Василий Тополев @vasil_topolev · 44,432 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Рой ТВ - Максим Калашников @roy_tv_mk · 55,270 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,854 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Бедный Рюрик @akalitin · 30,281 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
ДОЛГОВ @superdolgov · 33,487 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Лев Вершинин @putnik1lv · 42,301 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
историк-алкоголик @istrkalkglk · 122,253 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Толкователь @tolk_tolk · 125,994 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Новости истории и археологии @arch_history_news · 24,797 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Марина Ахмедова @Marinaslovo · 98,576 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 271 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Делягин, Михаил Геннадьевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Употреблял лозунг "[[Люди – вторая нефть|Вы - новая нефть]]"[https://t.me/russ_orientalist/22076 Telegram: View @russ_orientalist<!-- Заголовок добавлен…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Димитриев” (@russ_orientalist), 130,371 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russ_orientalist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
