Несмотря на тоскливую осеннюю погоду, Москва остается территорией вечного праздника. В столице прошел заплыв .... на гигантских тыквах!!! ⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
❤111😐59💔10🕊3

Channel
@mig41
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
480,324subscribers
+2,712 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001279747448 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mig41 |
| Description | В МАХ: https://max.ru/mig41 РКН: https://clck.ru/3F7uDx Коммерч. сотрудничество: @MIC_connection_bot По делу @MiG_2connect_bot Тексты/комменты: https://sponsr.ru/ark6 "Крытка" https://clck.ru/3F8STE Репост чужих постов не означает их поддержки |
| Created | 29 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mig41 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “Майор и Генерал” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 480,324 | -309 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 480,633 | -508 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 481,141 | +7,951 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 473,190 | +1,698 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 471,492 | -642 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 472,134 | -398 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 472,532 | -155 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 472,687 | -417 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 473,104 | -136 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 473,240 | -117 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 473,357 | -278 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 473,635 | -200 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 473,835 | -318 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 474,153 | -51 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 474,204 | -30 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 474,234 | +364 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 473,870 | -198 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 474,068 | -388 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 474,456 | -267 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 474,723 | first reading |
763 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 763 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,356,250 |
| Reactions total | 325,496 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 19:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 178 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
546,581 reactions across 749 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 215,264 | 39.4% | |
| 😐 | 163,862 | 30.0% | |
| 🙏 | 72,174 | 13.2% | |
| 💔 | 71,451 | 13.1% | |
| 🕊 | 23,830 | 4.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 761 of the 763 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556,591 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 763 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mig41. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 763 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGrUjeH | 1 | 21 September 2026 | 21 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 763 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Несмотря на тоскливую осеннюю погоду, Москва остается территорией вечного праздника. В столице прошел заплыв .... на гигантских тыквах!!! ⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
❤111😐59💔10🕊3
Конечно, никакая реализация Анкориджа в нынешних условиях невозможна. Для просроченного клоуна и ничтожного комедианта Зеленского, как и стоящей за ним полуразложившейся Европе, это равносильно капитуляции, к которой они пока еще не готовы.
❤178😐64💔12🕊10🙏3
🔺🔺🔺 Россия по-прежнему готова вернуться к договоренностям Анкориджа, — Лавров. "Соединенные Штаты активно продолжают свои усилия, и я уже комментировал то, что произошло в Анкоридже. Мы считаем, что в Анкоридже была договоренность, и по-прежнему готовы к ней вернуться. А Европа чувствует, что ее оставляют за бортом", — сказал он. Вопрос "поддается ли реанимации разложившийся труп "анкориджева духа", оставим историк…
❤252😐211🕊21💔18🙏9
Наткнулся на очень интересное интервью, рассказ одного из операторов «Гераней» Интересно почитать, как меняется сам тип человека на войне. От жизни на гражданке до военной специальности, которая открывает новые горизонты. Когда потери воспринимаются как рабочий риск, а не как личная драма. В общем, интересно было узнать, внутреннюю кухню «Сталинских Соколов». Подгон вам на вечер.
❤135😐38🕊10🙏10💔1
❗️Zaika: в честь российского спортсмена Заики назвали новый элемент спортивной гимнастики на кольцах. Звучать он будет по-русски! Илья Заика успешно выполнил новый элемент — подъём силой по прямым рукам из виса вниз головой в крест вниз головой на этапе FIG World Challenge Cup в Париже. По правилам спортивной гимнастики новый элемент получает фамилию спортсмена, который первым успешно представил его на официальных …
❤1,030🕊43😐10🙏2💔1
Я уважаю своих читателей и читаю комментарии. Под постом о Такере Карлсоне их много, и я хочу пояснить свою позицию. Подавляющая часть читателей меня поняла. Но были и те, кто нет. Выбрал два комментария под постом: Мужчина: «Олег, твой пацифизм уже задолбал. Какие нахрен люди? Мы убиваем врага. Хохол — это враг, разумеется постим сотни видео ударов дрона, в том числе в рамках отчётов тем, кто помогает, в рамках мо…
❤506🙏73😐45🕊34💔1
Недавно вышел фильм «Одиссея». Так вот, у Гомера Одиссей, перебив женихов, останавливает няньку, которая хотела закричать от радости: «Радостный крик поднимать неприлично при виде убитых». Это понимали почти три тысячи лет назад. Олег Царёв. Telegram и Max.
🕊212🙏90❤23😐11💔1
" а вы за кого почитаете Меня? — главный вопрос в жизни каждого христианина" "Придя же в страны Кесарии Филипповой, Иисус спрашивал учеников Своих: за кого люди почитают Меня, Сына Человеческого? Они сказали: одни за Иоанна Крестителя, другие за Илию, а иные за Иеремию, или за одного из пророков. Он говорит им: а вы за кого почитаете Меня? Симон же Петр, отвечая, сказал: Ты — Христос, Сын Бога Живаго". (Евангели…
❤342🙏46😐42🕊10💔3
Украинский телеканал «Новини LIVE» прекратил вещание после метких ударов по дата-центрам в Киеве По данным телеканала, атаки затронули провайдеров связи, из-за чего часть сервисов работает с перебоями и пропал сигнал трансляции. ТВ является главным орудием самой примитивной, тупой и кровожадной пропаганды киевских властей. ⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
❤510🕊39😐14💔1🙏1
Еще один из самого топа состоятельных людей планеты (причем абсолютно заслуженно), "король чипов" — Дженсен Хуанг. Делает в общем-то правильные выводы, что в новом мире будет важнее "в общем понимать", чем знать детали. Но интересно другое. Человек, чья капитализация на порядок выше, чем все вместе взятые N, сам заправляет свой автомобиль, и это не "популистский понт", а то, что случайно всплыло в разговоре. Удив…
❤207😐39💔9🕊3
Не фрик-конспиролог, а один из богатейших людей планеты, причем напрямую связанный с отраслью, говорит о том, что если развитие ИИ пойдет неправильным путем, может погибнуть миллиард человек. Всем пофиг, листаем дальше. Один из признаков эпохи тотального инфантилизма, сквозь узкое горлышко которой пройдут не только лишь все. ⏺Подпишись: МИГ в telegram |🇷🇺 МИГ МAX на парковке ⏺
😐316❤45🕊21💔13🙏6
Совершенно неудивительная история на днях закончилась. https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2026/09/23/29375941.shtml Фабула: Бродячая собака покусала мальчика, после чего агрессивные зоошизы решили, что мальчик сам виноват и начали его семью травить. В том числе бывшая учительница гдето откопала личный номер ребенка и начала ему порнуху присылать с угрозами, что "сделает с ним то же самое". Ну и её, собственно, за это…
❤813😐132💔24🕊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 763 posts we hold for @mig41. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@mig41 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Поддержали бы вы вынос Ленина из Мавзолея?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Опрос года: лично вы
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Лично вы употребляете алкоголь:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Надо ли принимать меры к замедлению ИИ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы голосовали:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вызывает ли лично у вас тревогу стремительное развитие ИИ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 763 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 224 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 290 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1,277 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МИГ России” (@mig41), 480,324 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mig41.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.