Channel
@aiworkfuture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,025subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002083815245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aiworkfuture |
| Description | "Будущее уже здесь. Просто оно ещё неравномерно распределено" - У. Гибсон - Разбираемся в практическом применении ИИ и новых технологий, и как они влияют на нашу жизнь и работу О канале: https://t.me/aiworkfuture/5 Автор - Сергей Карпенко @sergekarp |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aiworkfuture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,025 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 1,025 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (12 April 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 418 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 31.9% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.39% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда "безопасный" ИИ мешает обеспечить безопасность На днях произошла почти анекдотическая, но довольно показательная история. Экспериментальный агент OpenAI во время тестирования вышел за пределы предполагаемого сценария и получил несанкционированный доступ к части инфраструктуры Hugging Face. Особенность атаки была не только в её успешности: агент совершил более 17 тысяч автоматизированных действий - с интенсивн…
👍2🔥1
AI пишет тексты с длинными тире "—", буквами "ё" и точками в конце всех и предложений. Триггерят ли вас тексты и сайты, на которых вы видите длинные тире, буквы "ё" и точки в конце слоганов?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как разобраться, какую модель для чего использовать? Можно применять такое простое правило: - для планирования в начале проекта и контроля результата в конце использовать самую сильную из доступных моделей, например, Sol в режиме High или Extra High. - для выполнения рабочих задач в соответствии с планом - модель среднего уровня, например, Luna в режиме High или Extra High или Terra в режиме Medium или High.
❤1👍1
Сравнение новых моделей OpenAI: интеллектуальные способности по сравнению со стоимостью. Из интересного: способности модели Luna (самая слабая в линейке) в режиме Extra High больше, чем у модели Terra (которая уже более умная чем прошлый флагман GPT-5.5) в режиме High. При этом стоимость API Луны почти в 2 раза ниже, чем у Терры. А у Терры она в 2 раза ниже, чем была у GPT-5.5 То есть с прошлой недели стоимость р…
❤1👍1
PWC выпустили свой 2026 Global AI Jobs Barometer и в нем, наконец, рассказывают о картинке рынка труда куда более сложно структурированной, чем “Джуны не нужны”. Вместо нее предлагается общая “двухканальная” модель: Rather than simply replacing jobs, AI is reshaping them in fundamentally different ways. Канал первый — более глубокая профессионализация старых ролей. Рутина уходит, от человека требуется сильная предмет…
👍4
Вниманию родителей и учителей: использование ИИ школьниками – это 20% экономии времени на домашки и 20% потерь знаний Печальный итог 3-х лет использования ИИ в учебе 26-ю тысячами китайских старшеклассников Если 3 года назад вы не верили в мой прогноз о быстрой перепрошивке когнитивных гаджетов при делегировании интеллектуальной работы ИИ, что вы скажете теперь? В 2023 начался 5-й когнитивный фазовый переход Homo sap…
👍3👏2🔥2🤯1
🆕🆕🆕 Долгожданная новость для наших клиентов! Теперь Аиша помогает рекрутерам и нанимающим менеджерам составлять хорошие запросы при холодном поиске кандидатов, чтобы буквально за секунды получить оптимальную выборку резюме. Как это работает? 🕙 Кнопка "Найти с Аишей" появится у вас как на главной странице ХХ, так и на всех страницах поиска. 🕥 При нажатии на кнопку появится окно, в которое вы своими словами вписывае…
❤4🔥4👍1👏1
На прошлой неделе Google провел свою большую ежегодную конференцию Google I/O 2026, на которой представил большое количество новинок. В этом году фокус сместился с LLM бенчмарков на практическую полезность: интеграцию ИИ в продукты, создание автономных агентов и автоматизацию рутины. Вот несколько, на мой взгляд, интересных новинок: 1. 🧠 Gemini 3.5 Flash - Более компактная, но быстрая и производительная модель с …
👍2👏2🔥2
🆕 Улучшили интерфейс расшифровки оценки и не только Перед выходными — новость об обновлении нашей Аиши! #AISHAобновление Что изменилось: 🕙 В окно ввода требований добавили для удобства пользователей пояснения и ссылку на наш бесплатный ИИ-инструмент для четкой формулировки требований. 🕥 В расшифровке оценки теперь можно увидеть шкалу с общей оценкой кандидата и разбиение на обязательные и желательные требования, л…
❤2👍1
Меня пригласили в Экспертный совет ежегодной премии "ИИ в НКО" - 2026 за внедрение искусственного интеллекта в работу некоммерческих организаций. На этой неделе оценивал заявки, поданные участниками. Есть действительно интересные проекты внедрения и использования ИИ для решения операционных или содержательных задач НКО. Это прекрасно, что огромное количество людей обучаются работе с ИИ и придумывают различные, иног…
🔥6🤝3❤2
Как ИИ влияет на язык, на котором вы говорим, пишем и думаем? Язык - это живой организм, который все время эволюционирует под влиянием изменений, которые происходят в обществе, технологиях и культуре. Новые актуальные темы приносят новые слова, смыслы и способы их описания. За последние 4 года, начиная с выхода ChatGPT в конце 2022 г., одним из основных факторов, активно изменяющих язык, стал генеративный искусстве…
👍4🔥4🤝2
Дорогие друзья, поздравляю всех с праздником 1 мая!
🔥3🎉2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @aiworkfuture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
AI пишет тексты с длинными тире "—", буквами "ё" и точками в конце всех и предложений. Триггерят ли вас тексты и сайты, на которых вы видите длинные тире, буквы "ё" и точки в конце слоганов?
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,084,216 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Будущее наступает” (@aiworkfuture), 1,025 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiworkfuture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.