Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Елена Витчак | ПРОлюдей

Channel

Елена Витчак | ПРОлюдей

@vitchak_propeople

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,466subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001076357018
TypeChannel
Username@vitchak_propeople
DescriptionЗаявление в РКН номер 7691986248 Это личный канал 🙌 Про жизнь в рабочем пространстве в широком смысле и с разных углов зрения. Знаю все про непредсказуемый человеческий фактор в организационном контексте. Делаю сложное понятным.
Created22 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vitchak_propeople

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,39710,49510,4466 August 2026 — 10,469 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,469 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,468 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,462 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,461 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,460 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,462 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,455 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,442 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,440 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,433 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,428 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,422 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,420 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,415 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,419 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,419 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,413 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,412 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,404 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,403 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,400 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,407 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,399 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,397 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10,405 subscribers6 October 2026 — 10,407 subscribers10 October 2026 — 10,416 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,420 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,418 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,448 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,493 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,491 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,489 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,490 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,495 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,489 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,482 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,479 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,477 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,471 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,467 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,465 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,468 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,467 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,470 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,467 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,464 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,460 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,449 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,474 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,469 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,466 subscribers10,4666 August 20268 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,382–10,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 07:2010,466-3
7 Nov 2026, 01:3810,469-5
5 Nov 2026, 22:1710,474+25
4 Nov 2026, 19:1910,449-11
3 Nov 2026, 17:4910,460-4
2 Nov 2026, 16:4810,464-3
1 Nov 2026, 19:0610,467-3
31 Oct 2026, 18:5010,470+3
30 Oct 2026, 16:5510,467-1
29 Oct 2026, 13:5910,468+3
28 Oct 2026, 10:5910,465-2
27 Oct 2026, 10:4010,467-4
26 Oct 2026, 12:4010,471-6
25 Oct 2026, 12:3010,477-2
24 Oct 2026, 09:0510,479-3
23 Oct 2026, 07:1610,482-7
22 Oct 2026, 04:2010,489-6
20 Oct 2026, 21:3410,495+5
19 Oct 2026, 23:2910,490+1
19 Oct 2026, 01:0710,489first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 10,466 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held51 (4 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total44,010
Reactions total1,160
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
376
Videos
157
Links
469

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,069 reactions across 49 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,03049.9%
🔥1,05826.0%
😁2486.09%
💯1844.52%
👍1714.20%
❤‍🔥1563.83%
🤣1243.05%
👏240.59%
🤔230.565%
🙏130.319%
🤗80.197%
🥰70.172%
😍60.147%
😢60.147%
💔50.123%
🤝30.074%
🎉10.025%
🥱10.025%
🥴10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 50 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vitchak_propeople. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (47.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,030 views109 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Моя Вселенная устроена следующим образом. 💥Когда я делаю что -то не так , я НЕМЕДЛЕННО получают по «соплям». 🔥Всегда жестко и неприятно. Но всегда честно. Потом у меня короткое осмысление того , что произошло ( есть «время на печальку", оно ограниченное ). ✅Потом я смотрю себе в глаза в зеркало и говорю ( это важно , попробуйте долго посмотреть себе в глаза. Хотя бы минуту ) и говорю. Ленок , опыт получен. Идем д…

❤77🔥23💯9

5 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,690 views66 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Компании стали возвращать работников, которых сократили из-за внедрения ИИ— AP Некоторые компании вновь нанимают сотрудников на должности, упраздненные при внедрении ИИ. Технологии не оправдали ожиданий и потребовали больше человеческого контроля, чем ожидалось, пишет Associated Press. Как отмечает агентство, явление получило название «ИИ-бумеранг». 🔵 Кто возвращает людей. Среди примеров, которые приводятся в стать…

👍38❤19👏9

4 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈1,870 views61 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Господи!!!!!! Зачем я на секунду задержалась на этих лицах 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣???? Вся лента в них ) А ведь было про людей , про менеджмент , про мозг. Пропал дом )))

🤣51❤9😁1

4 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,880 views96 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Обесценивание: как мы незаметно «обнуляем» друг друга на работе На одной стратегической сессии в блоке #ЛЮДИ много раз звучало в дискуссиях. И я что то села и подумала, а откуда ноги то растут ? Я вот люблю по разбираться в словах ( ибо силы сегодня как у панды в ролике )🤣 Обесценить значит лишить ценности. Слово пришло из экономики (обесценивание денег), а в психологию попало как описание того, что мы делаем с л…

❤56🔥38👏2

3 Nov 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,770 views30 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

А вот ещё одна тема, которую я бы точно не оставила без внимания 😊 Мы часто говорим о карьерном развитии, смене профессии и поиске своего места. Но почему-то кажется, что профориентация - это преимущественно история про подростков, которые выбирают, куда поступать. А взрослым, значит, уже поздно?)) На самом деле именно во взрослом возрасте карьерные вопросы порой становятся особенно непростыми. За плечами опыт, об…

❤17👍8🔥5

2 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,850 views31 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Мой ИИ GPT делает мне по понедельникам выжимку международных размышлений про управление людьми. 📌Тема этой недели — растущие требования к руководителям и сотрудникам, за которыми не всегда успевают управленческие системы. 1. Руководителю добавляют задачи, но не убирают прежние. В опубликованном 14 октября опросе Betterworks 1521 HR- и бизнес-руководителя 86% сказали, что за три года выросла важность управления изм…

❤21🔥8😁2

30 Oct 2026, 07:41 UTC≈2,210 views47 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

#пятница Уж если приходит цунами , Веди себя как подобает , Беги и ори во все горло 📌🤭 Обнаружено в книге «Человек переживающий» Но зачем орать, когда можно потанцевать. Согласны ?

💯22😁11🔥10❤4

29 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,240 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Недавно поймала себя на мысли: лучшие кейсы и открытия в нашей профессии почти всегда рождаются из неловкости, тупиков и факапов. Когда клиент выдает то, к чему тебя не готовил ни один учебник, а привычные алгоритмы просто рассыпаются. И сидишь после консультации в тишине с одним вопросом: «И что это сейчас было?».👻 О таких вещах редко говорят вслух, ведь у нас принято транслировать безупречность и контролируемый р…

❤14🔥11

29 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,970 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Значит, вот что! Минутка добрых слов профи по карьере)) Вы знаете, я редко рекомендую, но иногда очень метко. Разговор про карьеру - сейчас дело тонкое. Маккинзи давно придумали термин CAREER LETTICE ( КАРЬЕРНАЯ РЕШЕТКА) Вот и подумайте о себе 😊 с правильными людьми.

👍5❤2

28 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈2,160 views138 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Фантастическая неделя! Я даже не помню, чтобы у меня были такие разнонаправленные задачи в одно время. 1) Невозможно сложная стратегическая сессия с холдингом в Дубаи 2) выступление перед HR Банка России 3) Выступление в NOODOME на тему "Что такое не везет? и как с этим бороться 4) Лекции для студентов 6 курса мед института 6) Выступление для благотворительного фонда про потенциал. Все разное. Много нового 😎 Я пр…

❤84❤‍🔥22🔥18👍13👏1

26 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,370 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вебинар Елены Витчак о том, в какой управленческой логике руководителю принимать решения о людях в компании сегодня Управление людьми в нестабильном контексте выходит за границы управления персоналом. Решения о структуре, численности и эффективности команды это зона ответственности собственника, генерального директора, коммерческого, операционного и финансового директоров. На экспертной встрече с Еленой Витчак, Про…

❤24👍1

26 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,880 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

Конечно, я забыла, завтра вебинар мой про программу "Дорогие люди" 😊 Склероз , присылайте кого-то на программу, приходите на час поговорить рекомендуйте в мир ‼️ Вам зачтется! Обратите внимание, ждем на программу коммерсов, опер директоров и всех, кто совершает кадровые ошибки, не подозревая про их стоимость 😊 + считает циферки расходов на персонал ( ибо это считать легче).

🔥15❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @vitchak_propeople. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vitchak_propeople edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лидерская позиция | Андрей Шапенко
@leadership_position · 27,475
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Skolkovo School of Management
@skolkovo_channel · 43,438
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 28 August 2026
Филипп Гузенюк I Счастье в деятельности
@guzenuk · 22,052
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 September 2026
Ольга Абрамова про переговоры
@HRD_mediator · 28,295
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
HR-аналитика
@hranalitycs · 34,231
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 3 September 2026
Нина Зверева: Семья и Школа
@ninazvereva · 31,669
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
СберУниверситет
@sber_university · 24,306
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
WTF_HR
@WTF_HR · 19,214
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 2 October 2026
Пригодится! 🍎 Библиотека для HR
@savetoreadlater · 22,083
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 21 September 2026
Елена Новоселова
@novoselova_time · 21,516
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Елена Витчак | ПРОлюдей” (@vitchak_propeople), 10,466 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitchak_propeople.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.