Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for N + 1

Channel

N + 1

@nplusone

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

65,475subscribers

+2,133 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001072523372
TypeChannel
Username@nplusone
DescriptionСвежая наука каждый день Для связи: @soy_kristina По вопросам рекламы и коммерческого сотрудничества: @katyuuush Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679234ce19290c0f936147cc
Created13 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nplusone

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

63,34265,47564,408.55 August 202610 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,022–65,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:5165,475+73
8 Nov 2026, 18:1165,402+6
7 Nov 2026, 12:4565,396+8
6 Nov 2026, 13:0965,388+45
5 Nov 2026, 13:5965,343+13
4 Nov 2026, 15:0665,330+56
3 Nov 2026, 15:1665,274+19
2 Nov 2026, 18:4865,255+24
1 Nov 2026, 15:3565,231+19
31 Oct 2026, 14:1565,212+3
30 Oct 2026, 13:5065,209+24
29 Oct 2026, 15:5165,185+44
28 Oct 2026, 16:2965,141+14
27 Oct 2026, 18:0765,127-9
26 Oct 2026, 18:1765,136+32
25 Oct 2026, 15:4565,104+43
24 Oct 2026, 12:1865,061-2
23 Oct 2026, 12:3865,063+26
22 Oct 2026, 15:4665,037+13
21 Oct 2026, 11:5765,024first reading

Engagement

906 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.70%
avg views ÷ 65,475 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,690
235 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
235
of 906 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held906 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,338,230
Reactions total18,697
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,720
Videos
≈302
Links
≈26,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 20s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

66,026 reactions across 890 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,21918.5%
custom 521768230304772538712,05918.3%
👍9,57414.5%
🔥9,05613.7%
😢6,2809.51%
😱4,7127.14%
😁4,0186.09%
custom 52042738790060812692,1393.24%
🤔2,0123.05%
🫡1,5622.37%
🎉8421.28%
🌚5940.9%
🗿5340.809%
👎4250.644%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 906 of the 906 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66,964 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 906 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
108
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 906 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
66
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nplusone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 906 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.32%
12 of 906 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,430
over 12 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,460
over 894 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFG3gRJq130 September 202630 September 2026
2W5zFGXKACr16 November 20266 November 2026
2W5zFHBqxEu124 September 202624 September 2026
2W5zFJpdfRC130 October 202630 October 2026
2W5zFJq3dJh117 September 202617 September 2026
2W5zFKAKTyB124 September 202624 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FuZ8VXKQnZsv3AXmjHd4tnmJikBC6yK111 September 202611 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 906 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 235 posts held from the last 30 days (5.53%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,540 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ингибитор янус-киназы и тирозинкиназы 2 брепоцитиниб уменьшает проявления саркоидоза кожи значительно эффективнее плацебо. Как показали предварительные результаты клинических испытаний, почти у 70 процентов пациентов кожа практически очистилась, выраженный эффект наблюдался даже при тяжелых формах в условии отмены пероральных глюкокортикоидов. Серьезных побочных эффектов не было #Медицина | *2.3 🙄 Подпишитесь на N …

👍7custom 52176823030477253874❤2custom 52042738790060812692

11 Nov 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,810 views57 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ученые выяснили, как осьминоги протискиваются через небольшие отверстия 🐙 В экспериментах осьминоги сначала ощупывали вход в отверстие, а затем просовывали через него несколько рук. Если отверстие было больше расстояния между глаз осьминога, он упирался щупальцами, которые уже успел просунуть, и проскальзывал внутрь одновременно остальными щупальцами и телом. Если же отверстие было меньше расстояния между глаз, то о…

🔥45👍6custom 52176823030477253874❤2

10 Nov 2026, 18:49 UTC≈4,910 views115 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Дыросодержащий продукт #заголовокдня

😁64custom 521768230304772538732custom 52042738790060812697🌚5🔥3❤2👍1🤔1

10 Nov 2026, 16:31 UTC≈5,330 views33 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ингаляционные кортикостероиды ухудшили биохимические показатели тяжести серповидноклеточной анемии. Согласно результатам нескольких исследований, применение ингаляционных кортикостероидов может облегчить тяжесть течения серповидноклеточной анемии. Однако рандомизированное клиническое исследование американских ученых показало, что применение ингаляционного мометазона у пациентов с серповидноклеточной анемией, сухим к…

😱17custom 52176823030477253876😢5❤2🌚1👍1custom 52042738790060812691

10 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈5,350 views137 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ДНК с обложки юбилейного издания «Эгоистичного гена» оказалась закручена в неправильную сторону 🧬 Недавно мы рассказывали, как любители космонавтики и типографики заметили, что буква S в одном из названий шаттла «Дискавери», нанесенных по бокам от его кабины, перевернута вверх ногами. Теперь стало известно о другой похожей ошибке — но более серьезной. Ее заметили в юбилейном издании знаменитой книги Ричарда Докинза …

😁89custom 521768230304772538720😱17👍5🔥4❤2

10 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC≈5,320 views76 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Зажатые светом волны материи сымитировали черную дыру. Физики из США создали резонатор Фабри — Перо для волн материи, в котором зафиксировали концентрацию энергии вокруг отдельных траекторий: при стробоскопическом наблюдении эволюция поля подчинилась уравнениям в искривленном пространстве-времени, а неподвижные точки сыграли роли горизонтов черных и белых дыр. Разные формы модуляции изменили число таких траекторий, …

🔥46custom 521768230304772538715custom 520427387900608126910👍3🗿1🤔1

10 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈5,540 views89 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Жестокое обращение в детстве связали с повышенным риском проблем с азартными играми. Жестокое обращение в детском возрасте связано с большим числом физических и психических отклонений во взрослом возрасте. Британские ученые обнаружили, что сексуализированное и физическое насилие, насилие между родителями и эмоциональное пренебрежение больше всего связаны с риском проблем с азартными играми во взрослом возрасте. Сама…

😢76❤6🤔2custom 52176823030477253872🌚1🗿1😁1

10 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC≈5,970 views169 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У берегов Канады встретили неучтенного северного гладкого китенка 🐳 С конца 2025 по начало 2026 года у северных гладких китов — одних из самых редких морских млекопитающих в мире — появились 24 детеныша. Это четвертый лучший результат за всю историю наблюдений. 23 китят зоологи учли во время мониторинга, который ежегодно проводится у юго-восточного побережья США с осени до весны. Еще один детеныш долгое время остава…

❤133custom 521768230304772538715👍10🎉4🔥3custom 52042738790060812692🌚1😁1

10 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈5,810 views79 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Таракан в желудке эоценового совенка помог уточнить время перехода сов к ночному образу жизни 🪳 Большинство современных сов ведут ночной или сумеречный образ жизни. Однако древнейшие представители отряда были дневными. Когда именно они сдвинули активность на темное время суток, остается неясным. Уточнить время перехода сов к ночному образу жизни помогла находка, сделанная в Германии. Палеонтологи обнаружили здесь ок…

custom 520427387900608126938🔥23👍7❤6custom 52176823030477253874👎1

10 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈5,220 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Экспериментальный агонист калиевых каналов азетукалнер существенно уменьшает частоту приступов устойчивой к терапии фокальной эпилепсии. Это выяснили ученые из пяти стран, которые провели клинические испытания третьей фазы с участием 374 пациентов на четырех континентах. Двойной слепой период лечения продолжался 12 недель, после него участники могли начать открытое продление терапии. 89,8 процента пациентов во врем…

👍20custom 521768230304772538713❤6🎉1🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈5,370 views87 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кащей Бессмертный похож на тихоходку: он без еды и воды годами томится в темнице в состоянии анабиоза. Избушка на курьих ножках могла быть чугунной: чтобы найти ее, приходится бродить по лесу в железных башмаках, металлическом колпаке и жевать чугунную просвирку. Колобок мог оказаться детским черепом, который торопится на кладбище, чтобы вернуться в могилу. Про неожиданные сюжеты и образы русских сказок рассказыва…

🔥40😁22custom 52176823030477253878❤5😱5👍4🫡3

9 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC≈5,660 views75 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Синь зеленая #заголовокдня

😢61😱8custom 52176823030477253873🌚1🗿1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 906 posts we hold for @nplusone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@nplusone edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @nplusone as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
33 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz358 voters

Это...🦇️️

  1. Нетопырь-карлик39%
  2. Остроухая ночница38%
  3. Большой трубконос23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz326 voters

Это...🦇️️

  1. Большой подковонос25%
  2. Ночница Наттерера46%
  3. Северный кожанок29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Oct 2026, 15:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz350 voters

Это...🦇️️

  1. Гигантская вечерница29%
  2. Водяная ночница34%
  3. Лесной нетопырь37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 15:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,340 voters approx.

В научных статьях какой дисциплины чаще всего встречается пословица «нет дыма без огня»?

  1. Экономика35%
  2. История28%
  3. Медицина37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 15:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,300 voters approx.

В научных статьях какой дисциплины чаще всего встречается пословица «лучше поздно, чем никогда»?

  1. Экономика48%
  2. Философия11%
  3. История41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,290 voters approx.

В научных статьях какой дисциплины чаще всего встречается пословица «о вкусах не спорят»?

  1. Право15%
  2. Философия42%
  3. Политика42%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 906 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

Затевахин о животных
@ivanzatevakhin · 2,529
5 posts
Молекулярная психиатрия
@molpsy · 1,048
4 posts
Вольф Кицес
@wolfkitses · 721
3 posts
алхимическая норка
@alchemhole · 258
2 posts
БиоХим 🗿
@anna_markina_bio · 192
2 posts
Генография рассказывает. Щёлоков интерпретирует
@genographic · 26
2 posts
Центр Космической Мысли ☄
@CenterProcosmos · 118
1 post
Исповедь шизофреника
@Confession_of_a_Schizophrenic · 36
1 post
ECONS
@Econsonline · 13,436
1 post
Богатый внутренний Рим
@InnerRome · 24
1 post
insomnia_1937
@Insomnia_1937 · 3
1 post
Интерсекс Новости
@IntersexNews_ru · 285
1 post
К-А: Постковид
@PostCovS · 96
1 post
Abel Frost в телеге
@abelfrost_telega · 29
1 post
Дроны, коптеры, БПЛА
@aerodyne_drones · 2
1 post
Alexey Surnin feed
@alexeysurninfeed · 15
1 post
Арго Феодосия
@argofeo · 126
1 post
у фонтана
@atthefountain · 47
1 post
biooncovet
@biooncovet · 358
1 post
Свалка новостей про ИИ
@brave_new_AI · 17
1 post
Цефалотус и другие
@cefalotusetc · 76
1 post
Рационально о коронавирусе
@coronavirus_facts · 2,327
1 post
Невролог Русскин Вадим
@docrusskinv · 1,935
1 post
DonbasStarLight
@donbasstarlight · 64
1 post
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 45,377
1 post
от.души.на
@drherzlich · 108
1 post
DRUGVoice podcast
@drugvoice · 330
1 post
Короче, нашла
@duozoidnoe · 1,193
1 post
Эдарби и Мексидол
@edarbi_meksidol · 36
1 post
evolution_time
@evolution_time · 20
1 post
Коты, книги и кино daily
@findacat · 198
1 post
Globo Lunar
@globolunar · 1
1 post
Ближе, бандерлоги
@hypnodance · 215
1 post
REBIKOV
@i_rebikov · 843
1 post
Котики с депрессией
@kittenswithdepression · 502
1 post
Книги и сиги
@knigi_and_sigi · 532
1 post
кьют-сионизм ✡️
@le_Juif_errant · 1,991
1 post
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,379
1 post
Лонг ковид, СХУ, Элерс-Данлос
@longcovid_mecfs_eds · 220
1 post
наша Крыша
@mentalkrysha · 421
1 post
Михаил Балкарей. Психотерапевт, психиатр, сексолог.
@mikhailbalkarey · 540
1 post
Мышнорушко онлайн
@myshnorushko · 123
1 post
Наркофобия
@narcophobia · 1,731
1 post
насекомость
@nasekomost · 5,269
1 post
Артамонов: Оборона России
@nationaldef · 114,777
1 post
Неолитика
@neolitica · 147
1 post
N + OFFLINE
@nplusoffline · 315
1 post
Образовач
@obrazovachannel · 3,194
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,780
#1
Naked Science
@nsmag · 245,244
#2
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,144
#3
Хабр
@habr_com · 134,497
#4
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 54,643
#5
ПостНаука
@postnauka · 22,286
#6
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#7
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,039
#8
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
#9
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
#10
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,577
#11
Лентач
@oldlentach · 262,523
#12
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 710,451
#13
Rozetked
@rozetked · 646,921
#14
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 368,836
#15
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 175,172
#16
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,903
#17
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,380
#18
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,022,997
#19
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,622,185
#20
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,108
#21
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,375
#22
Reddit
@Reddit · 160,928
#23
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,206
#24
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 742,328
#25
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#26
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 164,621
#27
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,097
#28
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,172,884
#29
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 297,807
#30
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,339
#31
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,444
#32
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,540
#33
Образовач
@obrazovachannel · 3,194
#34
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,254
#35
UX Live 🔥
@uxlive · 36,198
#36
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
#37
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 211,151
#38
Архитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,467
#39
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,538,229
#40
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,484
#41
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 97,956
#42
ASTRA
@astrapress · 350,188
#43
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,510
#44
The Insider
@theinsider · 152,865
#45
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 117,136
#46
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 175,531
#47
Пикабу
@pikabu · 254,974
#48
Александр Штефанов
@alexandrshtefanov · 205,137
#49
Kedr to Earth | Земля, я Кедр
@kedr2earth · 10,140
#50
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 74,886
#51
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 462,111
#52
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,654
#53
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 299,576
#54
Денис Чужой про комедию
@fe_city_boy · 27,504
#55
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 183,087
#56
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,504
#57
Labrats
@rlabrats · 17,027
#58
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 304,377
#59
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,286
#60
ИА Панорама
@ia_panorama · 76,084
#61
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,089
#62
Холод
@holodmedia · 57,924
#63
UsachevRuslan
@usachevruslan · 246,176
#64
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,719
#65
Лепра
@Lepragram · 340,793
#66
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,116,844
#67
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,588
#68
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,331
#69
Дудь
@yurydud · 849,220
#70
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#71
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,058,487
#72
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#73
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,966
#74
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,911
#75
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 913,555
#76
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101
#77
Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 167,164
#78
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 794,552
#79
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 418,557
#80
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 133,380
#81
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,059
#82
Dankest Memes // Данкест Мемс
@thedankestmemes · 46,177
#83
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 468,077
#84
N + 1 фотографирует котов и кошек
@npluscat · 492
#85
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,385
#86
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,088,291
#87
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,041
#88
Бумага: всё о Петербурге
@paperpaper_ru · 96,352
#89
Кроненберг нефильтрованный
@Cronenberg1664 · 38,527
#90
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 317,691
#91
Фонтанка SPB Online
@fontankaspb · 408,634
#92
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,212
#93
Zavtracast
@zavtracast · 14,734
#94
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,007
#95
Топ Twitter
@top_twit · 15,990
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПостНаука
@postnauka · 22,286
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Naked Science
@nsmag · 245,244
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Наука
@naukatv_ru · 23,587
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Александр Панчин
@ScienceInquisition · 49,147
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,514
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,192
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Смотровая Военврача
@dr_voenvrach · 45,377
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,208
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
kuji
@kujikuji · 49,816
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
Вокруг Света | Путешествия • История • Наука
@vokrugsveta1861 · 34,258
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Кот Шрёдингера
@kot_sh · 25,261
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
З—Ж
@t_zdorov · 19,377
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
АНТРОПОГЕНЕЗ.RU
@antropogenez_ru · 36,580
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Ряды Фурье
@Fourier_series · 43,923
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,665
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,691
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,617
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
Дубынин о мозге 🧠
@dubininvaofficial · 44,717
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Хабр
@habr_com · 134,497
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Редакция.Наука
@redakciya_nauka · 31,581
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,903
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Genotek
@genotek · 22,442
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
Йод | Лайфхакер
@lh_health · 22,577
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Всё как у зверей / радио Тимонова
@timonova · 20,497
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 67 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q56222814 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelN+1
DescriptionRussian online science and technology magazine
X / Twitter@nplusodin
Official sitehttps://nplus1.ru

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“N + 1” (@nplusone), 65,475 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nplusone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.