Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Градиент обреченный

Channel

Градиент обреченный

@doomgrad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,800subscribers

+118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001556862154
TypeChannel
Username@doomgrad
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/doomgrad

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,6818,8008,740.56 August 2026 — 8,682 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,682 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,681 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,697 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,702 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,708 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,709 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,715 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,720 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,724 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,733 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,781 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,789 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,800 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,663–8,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:388,800+11
14 Sept 2026, 01:408,789+8
10 Sept 2026, 06:598,781+48
4 Sept 2026, 19:408,733+9
28 Aug 2026, 23:258,724+4
25 Aug 2026, 21:598,720+5
22 Aug 2026, 17:178,715+6
19 Aug 2026, 14:368,709+1
16 Aug 2026, 21:178,708+6
13 Aug 2026, 16:378,702+5
10 Aug 2026, 21:378,697+16
7 Aug 2026, 13:308,681-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:508,682no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:508,682first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 38 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,234 reactions across 38 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁83137.2%
🔥39217.5%
👍32614.6%
❤28312.7%
custom 5328194680611975694783.49%
💯582.60%
⚡261.16%
✍231.03%
👀220.985%
🤯220.985%
🤔210.94%
🎉170.761%
💅150.671%
🍓140.627%
👎140.627%
🤗130.582%
❤‍🔥120.537%
custom 5388750545504737097100.448%
😭90.403%
🦄90.403%
7 further kinds391.75%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 38 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @doomgrad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,240 views71 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁49🤗13💯8❤1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

28 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,330 views52 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Нашу читалку начали смотреть в app store. Начали только после волшебной заявки в поддержку "request an expedited app review". Написали, что в материковом Китае для приложений, распространяющих книги и журналы, необходима лицензия. Убрал Китай и отправил повторно. В google play всё ещё висим. Каких-то пиналок не вижу, так что ждём. По идее тоже должны написать про Китай, иначе будет странно. Зато почти доделал веб-в…

🔥30❤13🍾7🤓2

Signed Sergei Averkiev

27 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,040 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Теория и практика заговора OpenAI выпустили отчёт по инциденту со взломом Hugging Face. Напомню, выглядело это так, что неким тестовым моделям класса кетер уровня Sol дали задание, а они пошли и взломали сторонний сайт с ответами, предварительно выйдя из песочницы. Всё это происходило в течение двух месяцев. В отчёте есть известная примесь киберпанка с заговором со стороны ИИ. - Началось всё в мае, когда обучали р…

🔥17😁9👍6❤4⚡1👾1🤯1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

23 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈3,470 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔺 Конференции и митапы в сентябре В сентябре ожидаем не только мемы про третье, но ещё и пару интересных событий. 🗓 5 сентября — deep tech night Мероприятие от Яндекса. Вижу доклады про инференс, агентов и продуктивность с использованием AI, послушаем. https://deeptechnight.ru 🗓 17 сентября — AI R&D Day Коллеги по Сберу расскажут, что у них нового в R&D. Тоже вижу прикольные доклады: про рассуждения, обработку …

👍11🔥10❤4✍3💅1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

22 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,400 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Нашли классный книжный во время прогулки по центру. Называется «Озеро», стоит на Хитровке, очень красивый и уютный, такие мы любим.

❤30🔥12✍5👍4

Signed Sergei Averkiev

19 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈3,330 views69 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ух, сделал в нашей читалке режим мультиязычного чтения. Много классиков типа Гоголя, Чехова, Куприна, Тургенева и других было переведено на разные языки, всё такое стараюсь собрать и делаю из этого параллельные книжки. Иностранных классиков тоже не забываю, так что библиотека потихоньку растёт, около 600 книг уже есть. Можно будет выбрать до 4 языков (если столько редакций присутствует в книжке). Но это всё для пато…

🔥41❤11👍11⚡3🦄2😭1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

17 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,880 views74 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁59custom 53281946806119756947💅3💔3💯2

Signed Sergei Averkiev

17 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,570 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Лаида, не грусти!

❤11👍2🎉1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

17 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,440 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @tech_priestess

Часто грущу от того, что нашей с коллегами последней статьей Unveiling Intrinsic Dimension of Texts: from Academic Abstract to Creative Story никто не интересуется и не цитирует... 💢 Напомню, что статья посвящена анализу внутренней размерности активаций LLM и её связи с различными свойствами текста, который подали на вход модели. Более подробное разъяснение статьи можно найти здесь, посмотреть видос про то, что тако…

👍16💅6🔥5❤4✍3

Signed Sergei Averkiev

16 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC≈3,020 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Рассылка от LinkedIn выглядит так, как будто тебя просматривают обнаженные люди. Чего они хотят? Что чувствуют в момент просмотра?

😁70🍓14🌚4👍2

Signed Sergei Averkiev

16 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,090 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Тыкаю GLM. От поиска уязвимостей, по крайней мере, не отказывается.

🔥28❤8😁6👍3👾2🤔1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

15 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈2,970 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

GLM 5.3 Zhipu вчера выпустили новую модель. Что интересно, после всех предыдущих инцидентов сделали упор на кибербезе: GLM-5.3 did not simply become better at identifying isolated flaws: it began to reason across multiple stages of exploitation, forming coherent plans for complete exploitation chains. Пишут, что на внутренних бенчах она на 50% процентов лучше GLM 5.2, с точки зрения команды, которая модель обучала…

🔥25👍4✍3⚡1

Signed Sergei Averkiev

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @doomgrad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@doomgrad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTCAnonymous Poll1,060 voters approx.

На каком языке общаетесь с агентами?

  1. на русском76%
  2. на английском39%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

gonzo-обзоры ML статей
@gonzo_ML · 24,354
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 29,146
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Machinelearning
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 279,417
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 96,889
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 52,530
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 79,594
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Sber AI
@SberAIScience · 27,144
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 46,785
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Data Secrets
@data_secrets · 94,138
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 137,325
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Machine learning Interview
@machinelearning_interview · 30,308
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 86,986
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Neurogen
@neurogen_news · 22,946
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
Dev & ML Connectable Jobs
@dev_connectablejobs · 27,959
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Анализ данных (Data analysis)
@data_analysis_ml · 50,656
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Neural Shit
@NeuralShit · 53,680
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Data Science
@datascienceiot · 42,634
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 62,598
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 30,808
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Hacker News
@hacker_news_feed · 29,771
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,603
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 73,946
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Tips AI | IT & AI
@tips_ai · 25,359
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Градиент обреченный” (@doomgrad), 8,800 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doomgrad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.