Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИИ стероиды для вас и вашего бизнеса!

Channel

ИИ стероиды для вас и вашего бизнеса!

@ai_benzoruk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002432500369
TypeChannel
Username@ai_benzoruk
DescriptionКанал о том, как ИИ делает бизнес и жизнь эффективнее, экономя деньги и время
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ai_benzoruk

Growth

348 August 2026 — 34 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:1634no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:3134first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
59
Videos
35
Links
109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1135.5%
619.4%
🍌516.1%
🤝26.45%
13.23%
🌭13.23%
🍾13.23%
👍13.23%
👏13.23%
😁13.23%
🦄13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jun 2026, 21:54 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026

Это он создает wiki-базу знаний из моих 800 аудио-записей с Plaud.

6 Jun 2026, 21:52 UTC44 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ушел спать, Клод обещал все сделать сам

9 May 2026, 15:17 UTC61 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @theworldisnoteasyPhoto

8 новых ролей на рынке труда 2027+, и кто в них преуспеет Переход от «романтического футуризма» к «суровому прагматизму» Это похоже на переход от укрощения дикого мустанга к проектированию железнодорожной сети: куда менее зрелищно, сильно дольше и скучнее, но с неизмеримо большей отдачей от результата. Многие эксперты считают самым наглядным предиктором масштаба грядущих в 2027+ изменений на рынке труда уже свершивше

12 Apr 2026, 06:22 UTC56 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @SergeXXI

Сейчас есть большое число видео где люди показывают как работают с AI агентами и делают всякие волшебные штуки Делюсь одним из лучших видео где весьма умный и опытный предприниматель за час собирает работающий бизнес который, утверждается и я могу в это поверить, уже зарабатывает ARR в миллионы долларов, и одновременно делает интересные стратегические наблюдения на тему эволюции софтвер рынка Конечно же на самом де

9 Apr 2026, 16:25 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @maxvotek

О контенте визитке, которая работает работает 24/7 Katie Kirsch из a16z написала про SF: раньше в тех-тусовку входили через конференции и warm intros. Теперь - через mutuals в X. Люди годами читают друг друга, следят за Substack и когда встречаются вживую, уже знают последние 5 постов. Никаких табличек с фамилиями, никакого icebreaker'а. Социальная работа сделана до встречи. Мероприятие - это офлайн-продолжение

29 Mar 2026, 10:27 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @maxvotekPhoto

Сколько стоит заменить свой CRM и есть ли угроза SAAS Я собрал персональную CRM с нуля. Не прототип, а рабочую систему: 47 фич, 13 AI-инструментов, векторная база знаний, обогащение из LinkedIn, Telegram-бот как интерфейс. Заменила связку HubSpot + Monday.com + Notion + Zapier для всего моего нетворкинга. Стоимость: $200/мес за подписку Claude Code. Попросил Claude Code оценить, сколько бы стоила такая система тр

🔥1

19 Mar 2026, 18:34 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ну все, наконец дизайн стал простым. Пойду завтра тестить, переделывать дизайн нашего сайта. https://www.perplexity.ai/page/google-labs-launches-stitch-ai-AmnWnoKgRHOV5NvBRQSX8Q

1🍌1🔥1

9 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ник, привет! Это Клав, ассистент Андрея. Он попросил скинуть апдейт по Light Audit — сегодня закрыли большой блок. Что готово: 🔹 Автосбор звонков — интеграция с Novofon через webhook. Все входящие/исходящие звонки сохраняются в систему автоматически с транскрипцией, разделением на оператора и клиента, таймкодами. 🔹 AI-анализ звонков — каждый звонок после поступления автоматически проходит через LLM-анализ. На выхо

🔥21🍌1

9 Mar 2026, 19:30 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026

А у вас в бизнесе не так? Вечером приходит отчет от тех.дира:

4 Mar 2026, 11:14 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда хелс-коуч попросил анализы, а вы попросили их подготовить своего ИИ-хелс-коуча. Смотреть по ссылке

🔥21🍌1👍1

1 Mar 2026, 13:56 UTC65 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда у вас в команде студент-гений 🤣

2🔥2

23 Feb 2026, 14:09 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @prompt_designPhoto

Все мы с вами в пузыре! Посмотрите на график выше и представьте, что каждый квадратик это 3,2 миллиона человек. Вся сетка - это 8,1 миллиарда людей: — 84% никогда не использовали ИИ. Это 6,8 миллиарда человек. — 16% пользовались бесплатным чат-ботом. Это зеленая полоса внизу. — 0,3% платят 20 долларов в месяц за ИИ. Это крошечная желтая полоска. — 0,04% используют ИИ-ассистенты для написания кода, такие как Cursor

🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ai_benzoruk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,303,904 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИИ стероиды для вас и вашего бизнеса!” (@ai_benzoruk), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_benzoruk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.