Погружаемся в машинное обучение и Data Science
Показываем как запускать любые LLm на пальцах.
По всем вопросам - @haarrp
@itchannels_telegram -🔥best channels
Реестр РКН: clck.ru/3Fmqri
Created
15 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -7,982. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278,220–288,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 03:16
279,417
-1,243
17 Sept 2026, 06:58
280,660
-284
15 Sept 2026, 04:56
280,944
-257
13 Sept 2026, 13:18
281,201
-277
11 Sept 2026, 16:16
281,478
-415
9 Sept 2026, 05:21
281,893
-536
5 Sept 2026, 19:15
282,429
-278
3 Sept 2026, 17:18
282,707
-203
2 Sept 2026, 08:24
282,910
-81
1 Sept 2026, 09:06
282,991
-110
31 Aug 2026, 10:07
283,101
-156
30 Aug 2026, 10:19
283,257
-180
29 Aug 2026, 08:35
283,437
-143
28 Aug 2026, 11:13
283,580
-221
27 Aug 2026, 09:27
283,801
-168
26 Aug 2026, 09:55
283,969
-218
25 Aug 2026, 10:48
284,187
-124
24 Aug 2026, 12:34
284,311
-212
22 Aug 2026, 20:12
284,523
-149
21 Aug 2026, 13:23
284,672
first reading
Engagement
278 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.73%
avg views ÷ 279,417 subscribers
Avg views / post
18,800
168 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.809%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
168
of 278 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
278 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
3,158,500
Reactions total
25,567
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,510
Videos
≈1,280
Links
≈5,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 17m
Average length
2m 38s
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
41,793 reactions across 273 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
11,674
27.9%
❤
5,834
14.0%
🔥
5,797
13.9%
🤔
3,795
9.08%
👏
2,171
5.19%
😁
2,131
5.10%
🤣
1,444
3.46%
🎉
1,323
3.17%
🤩
1,214
2.90%
👨💻
813
1.95%
🤓
760
1.82%
⚡
745
1.78%
💯
531
1.27%
🤬
530
1.27%
👌
383
0.916%
😢
358
0.857%
🤨
349
0.835%
🤗
230
0.55%
🥱
219
0.524%
😐
165
0.395%
38 further kinds
1,327
3.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 278 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,511 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 278 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ai_machinelearning_big_data. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 278 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.32%
12 of 278 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
12
posts carrying an erid · 12 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
17,800
over 12 measured posts
Median views · rest
19,000
over 266 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjd36qgF
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2VSb5ybG7Cv
1
23 September 2026
23 September 2026
2Vtzqv48qtp
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2VtzqvGyx6w
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2Vtzqw727Ws
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2Vtzqwno39C
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
2W5zFGjiQiM
1
17 September 2026
17 September 2026
2W5zFH1WNRP
1
7 September 2026
7 September 2026
2W5zFJZtwNH
1
22 September 2026
22 September 2026
2W5zFJipseH
1
12 September 2026
12 September 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7Fov77DtMRhzs2SyCqaSHhrquccPTsre
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqLRCNvWUsVJQbWQRbnbHLEnfzJdTyogsjdVw8
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
✔️ Апелляционный суд США оставил Anthropic в чёрном списке Пентагона
Суд округа Колумбия признал законным присвоение Anthropic статуса риска для цепочки поставок. Статус запрещает военным и их подрядчикам использовать Claude в работе на ведомство. Суд отклонил доводы компании о произвольности решения, превышении полномочий и нарушении конституции. По мнению суда, соотношение рисков вправе определять президент и мини…
📌Fable 5.1 рассчитала амплитуду рассеяния в девяти петлях
Модель в среде Claude Science рассчитала шестичастичную амплитуду рассеяния в планарной четырёхкратно суперсимметричной теории Янга–Миллса на уровне девяти петель.
Амплитуды рассеяния показывают, насколько вероятна та или иная реакция при столкновении частиц, и по ним теорию сверяют с данными Большого адронного коллайдера.
Целиком их не посчитать, поэтому ф…
✔️ Google добавила в Gemini 3.8 Live говорящий видеоаватар
Gemini 3.8 Live with Live Avatar - дополнение к голосовой модели Gemini 3.8 Live, которую компания представила 15 сентября.
Функция почти в реальном времени генерирует видео с персонажем, который ведёт разговор голосом, двигает губами в такт речи и меняет мимику.
Модель одновременно принимает от пользователя видео и звук, поддерживает естественную смену ре…
Появилось открытое сообщество для решения NetHack
Исследователи из AIRI зовут объединяться тех, кто работает над системами планирования для ИИ, чтобы решить NetHack.
По задумке лидера сообщества, Владислава Куренкова, у участников будет свой способ получить программу, свои инструменты и своя стратегия. Общая инфраструктура позволит видеть результаты, сравнивать их между собой и продолжать разрабатывать решения друг…
✔️ OpenAI выпустила открытый бенчмарк для оценки ИИ в психологии
Набор Mental Health Bench проверяет, как модели ведут себя в диалогах от бытового стресса и проблем в отношениях до тяжёлого дистресса и экстренных кризисов. Сценарии охватывают взрослых, подростков, опекунов и врачей. Критерии написали более 80 психологов и психиатров из 22 стран.
Итоговый балл раскладывается на десять параметров поведения, среди них…
⚡️ OpenAI готовит подписку ChatGPT Pro Max
Согласно утечкам из кодовой базы сервиса, в ближайшее время появится новый тарифный план ChatGPT Pro Max со стоимостью выше 200$.
Шаг продиктован серьезным дефицитом мощностей после запуска GPT-6 Astra, которая потребляет вычислительные ресурсы кратно интенсивнее предшественников.
Из-за резкого наплыва аудитории, две недели назад OpenAI пришлось временно приостанавливать …
AIJ Contest 2026: реши реальные задачи и получи возможность забрать свой кусок 10-миллионного призового фонда ⚡️
Это состязание уровня high-stakes: солидный призовой фонд, только практические задачи от Sber AI и шанс задать вектор развития AI‑решений.
5 треков — 5 возможностей предложить нестандартное решение:
✔️ Guardian of Truth — разработать фильтр для выявления галлюцинаций в ответах ИИ-агентов.
✔️ Green Chal…
✔️ Cursor сократил расход токенов
Anysphere переработала обвязку своего агента и снизила траты пользователей на токены на 7% без потери качества.
Системный промпт сократили примерно на 75%, так как современным моделям больше не нужны длинные списки запретов, достаточно описать, как работает инструмент.
Встроенные инструменты, которые требуются меньше чем в 20% диалогов, убрали из постоянного контекста и подгружают…
✔️ OpenAI обновила голосовой режим ChatGPT
Голосовой интерфейс ChatGPT перевели на новую линейку моделей GPT-6 (Astra, Sol и Luna).
Главное изменение - подключение голосового ядра к внешним плагинам и API. Теперь система выполняет сквозные действия без текстового ввода.
Пользователи могут голосом проверять календарь, отправлять письма, работать со Slack, отменять списания в финансовых сервисах и генерировать сайты…
30 сентября приглашаем на АЛЬФА ВААА{АИ}ЙЙЙБ МИТАП — масштабное событие про нейросети и вайб-кодинг. Узнаем, кто из финалистов АЛЬФА ВААА{АИ}ЙЙЙБ ХАКАТОНА получит миллион за проект высоконагруженного прокси.
В программе — техно-рейв с группой ЛАУД и ток-шоу про ИИ. Встречаемся в Москве на модной площадке Альфа-Кристалле или онлайн — главное зарегистрироваться.
🌟 Nvidia открыла веса модели для разметки спикеров в аудио
Nemotron 3 Diarization – открытая модель диаризации на 100 млн параметров, которая работает на аудиозаписях и в потоковом режиме, размечая на записи отрезки речи каждого участника, включая моменты, когда люди перебивают друг друга.
Вместе с ASR это даёт расшифровку встреч, звонков и подкастов с разметкой по говорящим.
Модель различает до восьми собеседнико…
📌 ИИ-агентам начинают писать инструкции — почти как новым сотрудникам
Ещё недавно от корпоративного ИИ требовалось в основном одно: хорошо отвечать на вопросы по документам и базам знаний. Теперь от него хотят другого — чтобы он мог сам довести задачу до результата.
Например, сотрудник пишет: «Собери отчёт по продажам за неделю, найди основные отклонения и подготовь письмо для команды».
Обычная LLM может написать …
🤣56👍12❤10🔥5😁3😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @ai_machinelearning_big_data. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 91 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 137 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Machine learning Interview @machinelearning_interview · 30,308 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
Data Science @datascienceiot · 42,634 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Анализ данных (Data analysis) @data_analysis_ml · 50,656 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Python/ django @pythonl · 58,866 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Искусственный интеллект. Высокие технологии @vistehno · 71,491 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Python вопросы с собеседований @python_job_interview · 24,881 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Data Science. SQL hub @sqlhub · 35,960 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Data Secrets @data_secrets · 94,138 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Data Science Jobs @datascienceml_jobs · 21,227 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
DevOps @DevOPSitsec · 23,684 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Sber AI @SberAIScience · 27,144 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Kali Linux @linuxkalii · 55,412 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
XOR @xor_journal · 182,317 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
gonzo-обзоры ML статей @gonzo_ML · 24,323 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Physics.Math.Code @physics_lib · 146,712 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Библиотека питониста | Python, Django, Flask @pyproglib · 37,384 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Data Science Jobs @datasciencejobs · 22,137 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
LLM под капотом @llm_under_hood · 29,146 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
эйай ньюз @ai_newz · 96,889 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
GitHub Community @github · 155,991 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
NOP::Nuances of Programming @nuancesprog · 56,542 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Сиолошная @seeallochnaya · 79,594 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Golang @Golang_google · 40,461 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще @cgevent · 52,530 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 104 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Machinelearning” (@ai_machinelearning_big_data), 279,417 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_machinelearning_big_data.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.