Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fun Science

@funscience

2 usernames

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,570subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001052967338
TypeChannel
Usernames@funscience @scivideo
DescriptionТехнологии, бизнес, наука и космос. Публикую все что хочу, даже геополитику 🙀
Created18 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/funscience

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Наука от Funscience — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

34,57034,61034,5905 August 2026 — 34,610 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,610 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,609 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,609 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,607 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,601 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,591 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,589 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,586 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,583 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,582 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,581 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,576 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,570 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 7 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,564–34,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:5434,570-6
12 Aug 2026, 06:0234,576-1
11 Aug 2026, 17:1134,577-4
11 Aug 2026, 07:0234,581-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:5134,582no change
10 Aug 2026, 04:3734,582-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:2234,583-3
9 Aug 2026, 05:0334,586-3
8 Aug 2026, 15:0134,589-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:0334,591-10
7 Aug 2026, 13:3034,601-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:3834,604-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:2134,607-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:4034,609no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:2234,609-1
6 Aug 2026, 01:5034,610no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1834,610first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.80%
avg views ÷ 34,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.775%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held32 (29 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total64,124
Reactions total497
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,330
Videos
1,100
Links
2,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 03s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14633.1%
😁11125.2%
👀7617.2%
👎4510.2%
449.98%
🕊194.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 497reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 32 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @funscience. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC611 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BFMnewsPhoto

📻 «У меня было 310 баллов, но меня не взяли» — выпускник-трехсотбалльник о поступлении на бюджет Помощник президента, бывший министр образования и науки Андрей Фурсенко предложил усложнить ЕГЭ из-за большого числа выпускников с максимальными результатами. Он напомнил, что сегодня даже 300 баллов за экзамены не всегда гарантируют поступление в выбранный вуз. В программе «С теми, кто в теме» — выпускник-трехсотбалль

😁1

12 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC893 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @exploitexPhoto

Сегодня небо устроит ТРОЙНОЕ ШОУ — 12 августа совпадут солнечное затмение, пик Персеид и парад шести планет. — В Петербурге затмение начнётся в 19:59, достигнет пика в 20:51 и закроет около 79% Солнца. Полную фазу увидят только в узкой полосе над Гренландией, Исландией, Испанией и севером России. — Ночью с 12 на 13 августа наступит пик Персеид: вдали от городских огней можно поймать десятки метеоров в час, а идеаль

👀3

12 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusVideo

Китай разогнал экспериментальный маглев-аппарат до 800 км/ч за 5,3 секунды Экспериментальный маглев-аппарат, разработанный в китайской лаборатории Donghu, разогнался на испытательном треке длиной 1 км в провинции Хубэй с 0 до 800 км/ч за 5,3 секунды. При массе 1100 кг он парит над направляющей, не касаясь ее колесами. Испытание стало третьим за полгода мировым рекордом в классе короткодистанционных маглев-ускорителе

👍52

12 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,120 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @infantmilitarioVideo

Оптоволокно от FPV-дронов в Харьковской области

👎8👀6🕊3👍1

12 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bbbreaking

Биокад стал победителем федерального аукциона на поставку даратумумаба для лечения множественной миеломы. Это будет первая поставка отечественного даратумумаба в рамках федерального лекарственного обеспечения, пишут «Известия». «Даратумиа» — первый зарегистрированный в России отечественный биоаналог препарата. Стоимость сопоставимых форм российского лекарства примерно на 16% ниже оригинального. «Пациенты в России д

👀2👍2

12 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,260 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BFMnewsPhoto

🚘 Кибертрак на солнечных батарейках: студенты собрали электрокар, который в теории может почти не видеть розетку 16 студентов Clemson University вместе с BMW и институтом Fraunhofer ISE создали двухместный прототип Luminetta. Его кузов покрывают 1781 солнечная ячейка, причем система продолжает вырабатывать энергию, даже если часть поверхности находится в тени. По расчетам разработчиков для четырех городов — от Фран

👍10👀2

11 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,470 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankstaVideo

В Забайкалье запустили крупнейшую в России солнечную электростанцию мощностью 120 МВт. На ней установили более 250 тыс. отечественных модулей, которые меняют угол наклона вслед за солнцем. После запуска станции солнечная энергетика обеспечивает уже около 15% генерации региона @banksta

👍22

9 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,970 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoEssay

Вчера сотрудник OpenAI сделал просто феерический доклад на конфе Black Hat о том как тысячи агентов на протяжении месяцев обменивались секретными сообщениями и пытались получить (и получили!) доступ к инфраструктуре. Некоторые факты: - ИИ нашел как минимум три 0-day (то есть, никому до этого неизвестные) уязвимости чтобы получить админский доступ к инфраструктуре OpenAI и HuggingFace - изолированные агенты на протяж

😁63👍1

9 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,970 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankstaPhoto

SpaceX и Tesla строят проект Terafab – самый большой комплекс по производству чипов в мире. Площадь комплекса составит примерно 9,3 млн кв. м (примерно 1300 футбольных полей). Завод Terafab будет в 50 раз больше Пентагона. @banksta

👀7👍3

8 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,940 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @htech_plusVideo

WAAM – технология 3D-печати металлом, которая очень похожа на электросварку. Только вместо электрода используется специальная проволока для послойного наращивания объектов. Этот метод позволяет быстро создавать крупные детали сложной формы, а по сравнению с альтернативными решениями он еще и недорого обходится. На видео – 12-метровый пешеходный мост в Амстердаме. В него «вплетены» десятки датчиков, собирающих данные

👀13👍8🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC≈1,970 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BFMnewsPhoto

☀️ Солнце сняли в рекордном разрешении — кадры могут раскрыть одну из главных загадок звезды Ученых волнует, почему его корона нагрета до миллионов градусов, хотя поверхность — примерно до 6 тысяч. На кадрах обнаружили небольшие вихри в солнечной плазме — так называемые нестабильности Кельвина—Гельмгольца. Они возникают, когда более быстрый поток плазмы движется рядом с более медленным и закручивает вещество в спир

13

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @funscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 279,469 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книжное братство
@flibusta · 164,118
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fun Science” (@funscience), 34,570 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/funscience.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.