Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Futuris

Channel

Futuris

@Futuris

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,923subscribers

+1,320 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001057593719
TypeChannel
Username@Futuris
Description@Futuris - пылесошу сеть в поисках редких информационных жемчужин: от безумных архитектур будущего до скрытых ИИ-инструментов. Не просто репощу новости, а ставлю опыты на нейро-сущностях Contact @antonod
Created22 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Futuris

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6036,9236,2635 August 2026 — 5,603 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,603 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,605 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,611 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,614 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,634 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,652 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,666 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,665 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,675 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,687 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,771 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,791 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,828 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,351 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,411 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,434 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,451 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,744 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,834 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,864 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,882 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,898 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,902 subscribers11 November 2026 — 6,923 subscribers5 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 98 days, net +1,320. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,405–7,121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:596,923+21
8 Nov 2026, 09:206,902+4
2 Nov 2026, 16:276,898+16
30 Oct 2026, 08:466,882+18
27 Oct 2026, 03:196,864+30
24 Oct 2026, 07:376,834+90
21 Oct 2026, 10:156,744+293
18 Oct 2026, 07:356,451+17
11 Oct 2026, 23:596,434+23
5 Oct 2026, 07:396,411+60
27 Sept 2026, 03:006,351+523
18 Sept 2026, 04:565,828+37
13 Sept 2026, 17:365,791+20
9 Sept 2026, 12:555,771+84
4 Sept 2026, 13:025,687+12
28 Aug 2026, 20:085,675+10
25 Aug 2026, 13:235,665-1
22 Aug 2026, 12:045,666+14
19 Aug 2026, 12:365,652+18
16 Aug 2026, 18:335,634first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 6,923 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held67 (28 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total81,034
Reactions total1,080
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 00:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,930
Videos
≈969
Links
≈2,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 02s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,606 reactions across 64 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥40925.5%
❤33020.5%
😁29518.4%
👍19812.3%
🤯1418.78%
🤡744.61%
👀191.18%
🙏181.12%
🤣171.06%
🌚130.809%
✍110.685%
😢100.623%
⚡80.498%
😱70.436%
🤔70.436%
❤‍🔥60.374%
🙈60.374%
👎50.311%
👏50.311%
👾50.311%
11 further kinds221.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 67 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Futuris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (58.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,110 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Да, это просто Pong от Fable 5.2😁 https://tennis.sixfingerpunch.com/ P.S. Делаем змейку?

🔥12👾5❤‍🔥1

Signed Anton

11 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,390 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

А теперь к реально серьёзным исследованиям: Один разработчик создал синтезатор, который имитирует работу человеческого голосового тракта и умеет петь. Другой вдохновился и пошёл дальше: показал симулятор пердежа с давлением, объёмом газа и работой сфинктеров!🤯 кому очень нужно - гитхаб тут https://github.com/jamesondh/chimera-vocal-synth/pull/66 теперь заменю на это все свои локальные аудио-модели надеюсь гений не …

🤣10🔥5👏3🤗2🙈2⚡1😁1

Signed Anton

11 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,590 views63 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Наконец-то! Qwen 4 Max изобрёл новый велосипед! Бенч уничтожен, с потрохами🤣 Срочно кидаем квен на сложнейшие задачи человечества! Вот он Alien intelligence в действии👽 P.S. Если когда то в будущем китайские модели изобретут лекарство от всех болезней и старения, я бы подождал ещё пару версий прежде чем принимать...

😁53🔥7❤3

Signed Anton

11 Nov 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,440 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Alibaba анонсировала Qwen4 и сразу открыла превью старшей модели Qwen4-Max. По описанию это мультимодальная модель с рассуждениями: понимает текст, картинки и видео, умеет вызывать инструменты и искать в интернете, держит контекст на 1 млн токенов и выдаёт ответ до 393 тысяч токенов, втрое больше, чем Qwen3.8-Max. Модель заточена под код, фронтенд, офисную работу и агентов, а её API совместим с OpenAI и Anthropic, та…

👍9✍1

Signed Anton

11 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,680 views35 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Похоже, Fable нащупала новый способ делать игры, похожие на ожившие картины 🎨 Разработчик с помощью Fable 5.2 меньше чем за час сделал браузерную 3D-прогулку по осеннему лесу. Вместо обычных текстур сцена собирается из виртуальных мазков, закреплённых на деревьях, земле и персонаже, поэтому они остаются на месте при движении камеры. По словам автора, каждый кадр содержит около 1,5 млн мазков, а на RTX 4090 всё работа…

🔥32❤2🤡1

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,860 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Вы не поверите, но ещё сегодня OpenAI запустила бету Businesses in ChatGPT, по сути карточку компании как в Google Картах, только внутри ChatGPT. Бизнес подтверждает свой профиль, сам обновляет цены и наличие товаров и видит, сколько раз его упоминали в ответах и сколько людей перешло на сайт. Интернет-магазины и онлайн-сервисы в США могут ещё завести своего Business Agent, который отвечает покупателям прямо в чате и…

❤5🔥1

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,730 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Anthropic начала выкатывать в Claude три новых инструмента: Whiteboards для совместных досок, Sheets для таблиц с формулами и Data для дашбордов, которые берут данные из Snowflake и Salesforce и даже собирают из метрик короткие ролики с озвучкой. Ещё внутри Claude теперь можно открыть Adobe, Atlassian и Box и работать в них прямо рядом с чатом, а скоро Claude можно будет позвать на созвон, чтобы он вёл заметки и сам …

🙏12😁7❤4👍2🔥1

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,660 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Google открыл доступ к Gemini 4 Carbon и только для Google AI Ultra🤡 ну хоть Аргон у дешёвых подписок не забрали (бенчи на табличке с фаблой можете освежить) P.S. Fable ✔️ Carbon✔️ кто-то ещё остался🤔

😁14❤1

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,580 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

ещё немного сравнений моделей🍿

👍6🔥5🤔1

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,590 views16 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Video

решил сравнить Fable 5.2 и Opus 5.5 оба на Extra, не знаю, может меня рутит на новый Opus, но мне он больше нравится🤷‍♂️ Fable тоже крут, разрешение и окружение получше кажется вышло Кажись фабла больше для сложных задач в долгую, чем просто 3д развлекухи P.S Присмотрелся к деталям, почитал комменты, все-таки фабла топ

🔥12⚡2❤2

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,660 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Anthropic запустила роудшоу, то есть встречи с инвесторами перед IPO. Акции выйдут на Nasdaq под тикером ANT по цене от $70 до $78, компания продаёт 825 млн бумаг и может привлечь до $64 млрд. На верхней границе её оценят до $1,4 трлн, хотя ещё в мае оценка была $965 млрд. Выручка за девять месяцев составила $33 млрд, годовой темп уже около $81 млрд. Чистый убыток за то же время $104 млрд, но в основном бумажный: из-…

👍4

Signed Anton

10 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,930 views33 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

а вот вам финал в бенче про пеликана. Fable 5.2 создала анимацию в Blender, даже не открывая его графический интерфейс. автор

👍22🔥11

Signed Anton

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @Futuris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Futuris as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Not Boring Tech
@notboring_tech · 21,121
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
Малоизвестное интересное
@theworldisnoteasy · 74,331
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
e/acc
@cryptoEssay · 63,613
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Нейроскептик
@neuroskep · 29,744
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,591
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Sber AI
@SberAIScience · 26,483
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Бурый
@sburyi · 20,145
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 93,512
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Критическое мышление
@ThinkCritical · 46,981
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
Ряды Фурье
@Fourier_series · 43,923
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Futuris” (@Futuris), 6,923 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Futuris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.