Channel
@vmarahovsky
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,689subscribers
+371 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001144482597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vmarahovsky |
| Description | канал Виктора Мараховского Платный проект: sponsr.ru/marahovsky для связи: viktormaraho@yandex.ru |
| Created | 20 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vmarahovsky |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
48,200 average views per post against 60,689 subscribers — an engagement rate of 79.4%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,252,200 |
| Mature posts only | 81.5% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 60,689 measured 12 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 7,904 channels · p10 2.39% · p25 4.93% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.0% · p90 37.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.026th percentile · 7.7× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.054% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 60,689 | +72 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 60,617 | +318 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:41 | 60,299 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 60,298 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 60,300 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 60,307 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 60,314 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 60,318 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 60,318 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (20 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,252,200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Минутка расшифровок. Опрос в Польше: если вкратце, большая часть шановнэго паньства за то, чтобы не имеющих легальной занятости граждан Украины призывного возраста депортировать нафиг. Может показаться, что это такая польская воинственность за чужой счёт: у вас там русские, чё вы с ними до последней капли крови за нас не бьётесь, быдло, а ну биться. На самом деле - лишь отчасти. Вряд ли мы ошибёмся, предположив, ч…
Не хочу ни с кем спорить, но единственное пространство, в котором наша ув. страна "имеет огромное моральное преимущество перед Украиной, потому что на её террор отвечает ударами по военным объектам" - это восприятие российских романтичных госэлитариев. Жители остальной планеты через западные СМИ всю дорогу получают инфу строго о том, что это Украина бьёт строго по военным объектам, в отличие от. И у нас, конечно, е…
Минутка ломающих новостей. Честно говоря, ув. друзья, давно пора придумать какую-нибудь единицу измерения психической энергии. Я не знаю, один юнг, например. Которым можно было бы измерять сожжённое внимание и эмоции. Если мы приучим себя вообще замечать, что кто-то тырит нашу психическую энергию кило- и мегаюнгами и пережигает их попусту, мы наверняка научимся и расходовать её разумней. В свете этой идеи хочу зам…
Минутка навигации. Едва ли, ув. друзья, я сообщу что-то новое, сказав, что мы в общем молодцы. Я имею в виду, что у нас, увы, отстойная госмедийка («ЧТО ИЗВЕСТНО ОБ АТАКАХ НА РЕГИОНЫ РФ» каждое утро плюс ретрансляция каких-то пенсионерских пафосов от госчиновниц, озвученная на мёртвом богослужебном агитпроп-языке советских 1970-х в стиле «украинский народ вот-вот прозреет и увидит нацистскую суть режима»), - у нас…
Минутка набрали по объявлению, часть 4326. ТАСС радует новостями географии.
Минутка нюансов. Мне, ув. друзья, порой кажется, что наши внешнеполитические матюгальники, в смысле рупоры, в результате какого-то ЧП развёрнуты внутрь и вещают сами на себя. Вот очередной самурайка героически встал бобром перед американцами и самоотверженно насаживался в день его личного и национального унижения на их вялый дискурс, в перерывах между притворными стонами завистливо осуждая свободных от иностранной …
Минутка науки. Мне рассказали, ув. друзья, про отличный бизнес: вы отправляете образцы своей ДНК, платите десять тыр и получаете расклад по своим талантам, способностям и чертам характера. И, конечно, ваши таланты будут неопределёнными, но непременно выдающимися. Услышав это, я отреагировал автоматически: - О, так это же "Кем вы были в прошлой жизни". В 90-е реально издавались толстые справочники с таблицами, в …
Минутка возмущения. Почему, спрашиваю я вас, мастерство и успехи наших ув. спецслужб прославляют хохлы? Из-за совкового, простите, немощного лицемерия нашей официалки, которая ещё в СССР запрещала публично упоминать вслух, что у нас разведчики и разведчицы тоже хитры и по-хорошему коварны и если надо безжалостны к врагам? Нет ли у этого немочного лицемерия какой-то связи с многолетней (ошибочной) репутацией нас ср…
Минутка вечных ценностей. Когда социологи будущего будут изучать наше время, ув. друзья - они как обычно упустят кучу важных вещей, о которых не писали тома, но которые сильнейшим образом повлияли на целые поколения. Взять, к примеру, Героев 3. Я имею в виду великую игру 1999 года. Астрологи объявили месяц суслика. Крестьяне хотят прославиться. Медузы ничего не могут сделать толком. Хахахаха, у меня 9990 скелетов,…
Минутка навигации. Был в своё время анекдот про «вторично образованную» даму, ув. друзья, которая открыла Шекспира и разочаровалась: - И что в нём находят? Ничего же оригинального, одни цитаты. Дама привыкла питаться обработанным и уже переваренным за Шекспиром продуктом поп-культуры — из-за чего и не опознала в оригинале оригинала. Такое бывает часто: люди, живя в мире, который сделало приемлемым христианство, по…
Иногда бывает так, что с утра вы держите пари, а к вечеру вашу ставку поддерживает зампред Совбеза России. Что касается текста о том, как правильно предсказывать будущее - то он вышел.
Минутка пари. Я, ув. друзья, предлагаю пари. В завтрашнем вдумчивом тексте на проекте высокооктановой мараховщины будет содержаться дерзкое мнение, что после выборов большой осенней мобилизации, о которой дудят укры и военблогеры, не будет. ...А вообще текст будет о том, как правильно предсказывать будущее. От автора "Минские соглашения провалятся" (2015), "Демографическая катастрофа быстрей и хуже, чем вы думаете…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @vmarahovsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 8,211 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мараховское время” (@vmarahovsky), 60,689 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vmarahovsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.