Channel
@vmarahovsky
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,724subscribers
+406 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001144482597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vmarahovsky |
| Description | канал Виктора Мараховского Платный проект: sponsr.ru/marahovsky для связи: [email protected] |
| Created | 20 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vmarahovsky |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
47,900 average views per post against 60,724 subscribers — an engagement rate of 78.9%. Across the 8,382 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.04% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.6%.
| Window | 30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 39 of 39 published in the window (0 exact, 39 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,869,200 |
| Mature posts only | 78.9% over 39 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 60,724 measured 25 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,382 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.04% · p50 10.6% · p75 21.0% · p90 35.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.272th percentile · 7.5× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.053% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 60,724 | -59 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 60,783 | -16 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 60,799 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 60,823 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 60,832 | -39 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 60,871 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 60,875 | +170 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 60,705 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 | 60,722 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:06 | 60,698 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 60,703 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 60,715 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 60,733 | +16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 60,717 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 60,703 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 60,706 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 60,709 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 60,726 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 60,738 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 60,751 | first reading |
82 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (20 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,869,200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Минутка навигации. На уходящей неделе ув. друзья, подписанные на высокооктановую мараховщину, читали вдумчивые тексты, из которых я особенно рекомендую два: Сексуальная училка меняет национальный характер двумя пикантными способами Детальный ответ на вопрос ув. подписчика о том, что такое на самом деле национальный характер и как он меняется - на примере ув. русских, греков, американцев, индийцев и одной горячей бл…
Минутка времени. Нас, ув. друзья, время шокирует только поначалу, пока мы его ещё не распробовали на вкус. Потом мы к нему привыкаем. Нас, грубо говоря, поражает только когда нашей ровеснице Бритни внезапно стукает 30 и нашей пубертатной поведенческой модели Киану 50. К тому времени, когда им будет 50 и 70, мы, их современники, уже свыкнемся, а "следующим молодым" будет вообще непонятно, в чём шок. Они офигеют о…
Минутка помощи. Дорогие парни, теперь вы знаете, как его найти. Просто откройте карту Пелопоннеса.
Минутка негров и роботов. Перед непростой проблемой, ув. друзья, встают культурные элиты передовых стран. Британская BBC сообщает, что: «Французское литературное сообщество взбудоражено: канадско-гаитянского писателя, которого называли новой сенсацией, обвинили в использовании искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) при написании его дебютного романа. 38-летний Телисон Орельен недавно получил премию Prix du Roman Fnac — пер…
Минутка дерзких версий. Суть такова, ув. друзья: то, что мы принимаем за тупой брейнрот (тиктоки-рилсы-шортсы) - на самом деле, хотя и не похоже по привычным нам по старпёрскому ХХ веку признакам, - есть идеология нынешнего времени. Т.е. реально миллионы людей поведенчески и, что ещё более значимо, в плане "ожиданий от жизни" программируют друг дружку на новое революционное самосознание. Пример и доказательство те…
Минутка парадоксов. На картинке - большой протест передовых масс в г. Лондоне против неуправляемого развития роботического интеллекта. На плакате написано "Не позволяйте ИИ определять ваше будущее". Есть, ув. друзья, какая-то глубинная ирония в том факте, что вывалили на улицу протестовать против машинного разума те же самые биолюди, которые вываливали за Украину, перед этим за Чёрные жизни имеют значение, перед эт…
Уже около 200 дронов попытались атаковать Москву. ...Вот зря это они. Совсем себя не берегут. P.S. от 7.05 мск: ближе к 300 уже. Нет, точно не берегут.
Минутка навигации. Сегодня, ув. друзья, как никогда актуальны слова Айзека Азимова, сказанные в 1961 году: «Если бы у меня спросили, что нужно производить, чтобы озолотиться в наше время, я бы посоветовал производить новости и лопаты. Я каждое утро велел бы своим СМИ запугать за день людей так, чтобы к вечеру они все бежали в магазины за моими лопатами и ночью рыли себе бункеры». Шутка. Азимов такого не говорил — …
Минутка главного. Ну и нас всех волнует, конечно, основной вопрос осени: - Начал ли ув. Тимофей из Московского зоопарка осеннюю зажировку? Новостные агентства молчат. На кого равняться?
Минутка расчётов. Мне, ув. друзья, однажды рассказали потрясающую историю из жизни. Один наш современник, сидя с восьмым стаканчиком виски в большом, но тесном кругу друзей и описывая свои финансовые заплёты, начал рассуждать вслух о том, каков его баланс, сколько ожидается поступлений и сколько планируется трат, и пришёл к выводу, что чёта не сходится. - Блин, - сказал он. - Придётся опять Ваську раскулачивать. Он…
В эфире ваша любимая рубрика "В СМИ набирают по объявлению". Интерфакс объясняет, как после роста до 105 нефть падает до 108. Пусть их уже всех заменят роботы, ну правда.
Вот вчера многие ув. инвэсторы обиделись. А надо было спокойно дождаться сегодняшнего комментария от Пескова. И не имели бы сегодня грустных лиц в 20-й раз, необучаемые вы наши.
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @vmarahovsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 55 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 107 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мараховское время” (@vmarahovsky), 60,724 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vmarahovsky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.