Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Psy Eyes

@Psy_Eyes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,942subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209639690
TypeChannel
Username@Psy_Eyes
DescriptionКреатив + AI + Web3... и мемы Личная страница @AndreyBezryadin Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/Psy_Eyes Без наценки Telegain и c индивидуальными датами — в личке.
Created14 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Psy_Eyes

Growth

6,9426,9486,9456 August 2026 — 6,948 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,946 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,941–6,949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:016,942-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:226,946-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:476,948first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 6,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held14 (9 July 202623 July 2026)
Views total11,600
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,570
Videos
1,720
Links
1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 24s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 13 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Psy_Eyes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

когда дал агенту из 2027 отрефакторить код агента из 2025, а он ничего не изменил, и ты читаешь его рассуждения.

20 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC≈2,270 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Прикольный кейс использования AI для создания поздравительного видео на свадьбу, показывающего как он и она тянутся друг к другу сквозь исторические эры, а заканчивается тем, как они встретились в реальности. Я как-то постил создание видео-поздравления с помощью HuMo, но Seedance 2 конечно вывел это всё на новый уровень.

14 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,630 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Бокал за всех авторов и редакторов доживших до этого дня! Обновляем телегу

13 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Хорошая короткометражка от Runway. Рассказывает простую историю без слов: всё через движения и эмоции персонажей (включая лампу), операторскую работу, а также игру света и тени. И аишности почти не видно. Лишь пожёванный ценник в начале и местами пустоватые глаза матери с ребёнком выдают, если не всматриваться в детали. Это могла бы быть реклама IKEA. Твит

13 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

HeyGen: теперь дают генерить видео аватаром на прозрачном фоне в формате WebM через HeyGen API, CLI, и MCP коннектор. Задаём в JSON структуре выходной формат WebM на /v3/videos и нам возвращается автар с прозрачным фоном, альфа каналом, и без зеленого экрана. Сайт

13 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,380 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Толковое использование Seedance 2. На таком эффекте можно целиком клип или рекламу собрать, например. А то скроллишь твиттер и там то и дело несвязная каша vfx-шотов c драконами, роботами, итд, которые подражают кадрам высокобюджетного кино, но пока до них не дотягивают. Твит

10 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC≈3,280 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Maestro: опенсорсный режиссёрский пульт, и как раз пример одного из приложений для Pinokio. Вместо нод Сomfy здесь обычный интерфейс с кнопками и слайдерами, но количество настроек может дать прикурить многим комфи воркфлоу. Очередь для генки также в наличии. Слева панель для создания контента. Есть набор скилов разбитый по пресетам: короткометражка / музыкальное видео, размер кадра, и разрешение. Прикручены актуал

10 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈9,770 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Pinokio: вышла версия v8 этого софта для упрощённой установки AI-приложений. Можно из Explore как поставить популярные типа Comfy, WanGP, итд, так и создать свои приложения/плагины в Сreate с помощью языковых моделей. Что нового: * Ускорена работа и отзывчивость. * Переделан и упрощен интерфейс. Отдельные вкладки для чекпоинтов, вспомогательных инструментов, скилов, итд, где можно установить недостающее. * Отдель

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Psy_Eyes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 335,186 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Технологии | Нейросети | Боты
@aiaiai · 177,975
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psy Eyes” (@Psy_Eyes), 6,942 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psy_Eyes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.