Channel
@tarjomaanweb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,628subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001003389194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tarjomaanweb |
| Description | 📌 ترجمۀ متون برگزیدۀ علومانسانی 📕 با تخفیف، مشترک فصلنامه شوید: https://B2n.ir/bp3486 🔗 اینستاگرام: goo.gl/Dfcpf6 🔗 توئیتر: goo.gl/8uecQd 🔗 بله: goo.gl/ZciVZ6 📮 ارتباط با ما: @Tarjomaaan |
| Created | 5 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tarjomaanweb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 42,628 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 42,625 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 42,626 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 42,619 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 42,612 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 42,594 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 42,584 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 42,579 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 42,572 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 42,562 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 42,562 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (1 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 94,830 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
. 🎯 کسی وقت ندارد، اما همه محتاج دانستناند؛ بهتر است «لید» را احیا کنیم 🔴 بیستسال پیش، که اینترنت در حال گسترش عمومی بود، خیلیها خوشبین بودند که دوران بیسابقهای از آگاهی و تساهل و انساندوستی در راه است. حالا آن خوشبینیها دود شده و به هوا رفتهاند. جهان درگیر چنان بحرانهایی است که برخی محققان حتی انقراضِ قریبالوقوع بشر را دور از ذهن نمیدانند. 🔴 آدام توز، مورخ بزرگ آمریکایی-انگلیسی، میگوید ما واردِ دورۀ…
@tarjomaanweb 👇
. 🎯 کسی وقت ندارد، اما همه محتاج دانستناند؛ بهتر است «لید» را احیا کنیم 📌 «لید» برشهایی کوتاه از متنهای بلند است، سرنخهایی حیاتی برای فهم آنچه در جامعه، سیاست و فرهنگ میگذرد، زاویههایی که در ازدحام خبرها و تحلیلها گم شدهاند، اما سمتوسوی فکر و نگاه ما را تغییر میدهند. لید مسیری جدید در کنار مجله، سایت و شبکههای اجتماعی ترجمان دارد. قالب، انتخاب موضوع و منطق روایت خود را دارد، هرچند در حساسیت به ایدههای مه…
— به نمایشگرتان دست نزنید 🎯 شما حواسپرت نیستید، حواستان را پرت کردهاند! 🔴 همه با نگرانی میگویند که «مرگ کتابخوانی» فرارسیده است. نمایشگرها در حال نابودکردن دستاوردهای تمدناند و باید به «جامعۀ پساسواد» خوشامد بگوییم. اما کارلو لاکونو، کتابدار دانشگاهی در استرالیا، که هر روز شاهد بود چطور جوانان در تالارهای کتابخانه ساعتها در کتابها غرق میشوند، نمیتوانست به آسانی این روایتِ ساده را قبول کند. بله، آمارها میگوین…
@tarjomaanweb 👇
🎯 با دوستتان به اختلاف خوردهاید؟ «حرفزدن» همیشه بهترین راهحل نیست 🔴 اوایل دهۀ ۱۹۸۰، یک محقق دانشگاهی که از دوستان دبورا تانن، روزنامهنگاری آمریکایی، بود از اون خواست به مکالمۀ ضبطشدۀ دو دختر دبستانی گوش بدهد. دوستِ تانن در حال تحقیق دربارۀ نحوۀ صحبتکردن بچهها با بهترین دوستانشان بود. در این مکالمه، جولیا به دوستش شنون، میگفت: «من و تو هیچوقت با هم دعوا نمیکنیم» و اگر هم اختلافی پیش بیاید، «با هم حرف میزنی…
@tarjomaanweb 👇
📌 شمارۀ سیوهشتم مجلۀ ترجمان منتشر شد. 🔴 شمارۀ سیوهشتم مجلۀ «ترجمان» منتشر شد. پروندۀ این شماره با عنوان «جنگ بیپایان» دربارۀ موضوعی بحث میکند که ما ایرانیان در یک سال گذشته بیش از هر زمان دیگری آن را تجربه کردیم. پرسش اصلی این است که چطور آمریکا با ایدههایی مثل انسانیسازیِ جنگ، کاهش تلفات غیرنظامیان، و رعایت همهجانبۀ موازینِ اخلاقی موفق شد جنگ را به وضعیت مستمر و همیشگی جهان تبدیل کند و نسل جدیدی از جنگهای ف…
@tarjomaanweb 👇
🔴 موری در مقالهای که سال ۱۹۹۶ در نشست انجمن مونپلرن ارائه کرد، به سوالی اساسی پرداخت: چطور میتوان نابرابریهای عظیمی که در اثر سیاستهای نئولیبرال بهوجود میآید را توجیه کرد؟ 🔴 پاسخ موری بر مفهوم «سرشت بشر» متکی بود. انسانها «ماهیتاً» با هم متفاوتند و سرمنشأ نابرابریها ژنتیک آنها، ضریبهوشیشان و محیطی است که کودکی خود را در آن سپری میکنند. پس نابرابری جزء لاینفک زندگی بشر است و حقانیت نئولیبرالیسم نیز در ای…
🎯 حرامزادههای هایک — چطور بازار آزاد نژادپرستی و بیگانههراسی را در آغوش کشید؟ 🔴 وقتی اعلام شد که در فیلم جدید کریستوفر نولان، اودیسه، نقش «هلن تروا» -زیباترین زن در اسطورههای یونانی- را زنی سیاهپوست بازی خواهد کرد، خیلیها، از جمله ایلان ماسک، این حد از تنوع نژادی در سینما را نقد کردند. بااینحال، حتی اگر در جایزههای پرسروصدای سینمایی، تنوع نژادی را پاس میدارند، شبکههای اجتماعی، پادکستها و میمها، آشکارا حاک…
@tarjomaanweb 👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @tarjomaanweb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tarjomaanweb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 28,459 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ترجمان علوم انسانى” (@tarjomaanweb), 42,628 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tarjomaanweb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.